Users Online: 591 Home Print this page Email this page Small font sizeDefault font sizeIncrease font size  
Home | About us | Editorial board | Search | Ahead of print | Current issue | Archives | Submit article | Instructions | Subscribe | Contacts | Login 


RSACP wishes to inform that it shall be discontinuing the dispatch of print copy of JOACP to it's Life members. The print copy of JOACP will be posted only to those life members who send us a written confirmation for continuation of print copy.
Kindly email your affirmation for print copies to dranjugrewal@gmail.com preferably by 30th June 2019.

 
RESEARCH PAPER
Year : 2011  |  Volume : 27  |  Issue : 1  |  Page : 31-34

Table tilt versus pelvic tilt position for intrauterine resuscitation during spinal anaesthesia for caesarian section


1 Reader, J.N. Medical College, AMU, Aligarh, India
2 Ex PG student, J.N. Medical College, AMU, Aligarh, India
3 PG student, J.N. Medical College, AMU, Aligarh, India
4 Lecturer, J.N. Medical College, AMU, Aligarh, India

Correspondence Address:
Shahla Haleem
Reader, J.N. Medical College, AMU, Aligarh
India
Login to access the Email id

Source of Support: None, Conflict of Interest: None


PMID: 21804702

Rights and PermissionsRights and Permissions

Background: This study was undertaken to compare the effects on intrauterine resuscitation by table tilt versus pelvic tilt position after spinal anaesthesia for Caesarian Section. Patients & Methods: Fifty ASA I and II patients who fulfilled the eligibility criteria were enrolled in the study and were divided into two groups: group W (Pelvic tilt with wedge under right hip and group L- (15 0 left lateral table tilt) and received spinal anaesthesia. The following parameters were recorded. Heart rate (HR), mean arterial pressure (MAP) at baseline, 2mins, 5 min and then 5 min thereafter. Mean height of block, Total no. of segments blocked, Onset Time of sensory block (in Minutes), ephedrine doses, incidence of hypotension & bradycardia, APGAR score at 1& 5 Minutes. Results : The decrease in MAP was much more in wedged position as compared to table tilt position also the incidence of hypotension was 40% in wedged position as compared to 12% in table tilt position. Mean height of block, Total no. of segments blocked, and boluses of inj. ephedrine used were more in the wedged position than in table tilt position. Conclusion: Wedge placement caused increased incidence of hypotension and higher blockade after spinal anaesthesia as compared to left lateral table tilt position, there was no adverse effects on foetus and patients tolerated wedge better than left lateral table tilt position. Also surgery was easier to perform after wedge placement.


[FULL TEXT] [PDF]*
Print this article     Email this article
 Next article
 Previous article
 Table of Contents

 Similar in PUBMED
   Search Pubmed for
   Search in Google Scholar for
 Related articles
 Citation Manager
 Access Statistics
 Reader Comments
 Email Alert *
 Add to My List *
 * Requires registration (Free)
 

 Article Access Statistics
    Viewed3155    
    Printed207    
    Emailed1    
    PDF Downloaded506    
    Comments [Add]    
    Cited by others 1    

Recommend this journal