Users Online: 484 Home Print this page Email this page Small font sizeDefault font sizeIncrease font size  
Home | About us | Editorial board | Search | Ahead of print | Current issue | Archives | Submit article | Instructions | Subscribe | Contacts | Login 
 

 
Table of Contents
ORIGINAL ARTICLE
Year : 2011  |  Volume : 27  |  Issue : 2  |  Page : 211-214

Post operative analgesia after incisional infiltration of bupivacaine v/s bupivacaine with buprenorphine


Department of Anaesthesiology, Institute of Kidney Diseases and Research Centre and Institute of Transplantation Sciences, Civil Hospital Campus, Ahmedabad, Gujarat - 380 016, India

Date of Web Publication3-Jun-2011

Correspondence Address:
Tanu R Mehta
2, Kaivil Bunglows, Premchandnagar Road, Judges Bunglow Area, Bodakdev, Ahmedabad, Gujarat - 380 054
India
Login to access the Email id

Source of Support: None, Conflict of Interest: None


DOI: 10.4103/0970-9185.81835

Rights and Permissions
   Abstract 

Introduction: Opioid receptors have been demonstrated in the peripheral nerve endings of afferent neurons. Blockade of these receptors with peripherally administered opioid is believed to result in analgesia.
Aim: To evaluate whether buprenorphine added to bupivacaine for wound infiltration can enhance post-operative analgesia via peripheral mechanisms.
Materials and Methods: Forty ASA I and II adult patients scheduled for open donor nephrectomy were enrolled in this randomized double blind prospective study. In group A ( n=20) patients, the wound was infiltrated with bupivacaine 0.5% (2 mg/kg) and in group B ( n=20) with bupivacaine 0.5% (2 mg/kg) and buprenorphine (2 μg/kg). All patients were given diclofenac 75 mg IM at 8 h interval. Post-operative quality of analgesia was assessed by VAS (0-10) for 24 h and when VAS > 4 rescue analgesic was administered. Total dose of rescue analgesic and side effects were noted.
Results: The time of administration of first rescue analgesic was significantly higher in group B (10.52±5.54 h) as compared to group A (3.275±1.8 h). Mean VAS was significantly lower in group B as compared to group A. The total dosage of rescue analgesic was more in group A as compared to group B patients.
Conclusion: Addition of buprenorphine to the local anesthetic significantly prolonged the time to first rescue analgesic requirement and the total consumption of rescue analgesic in 24 h, thus providing evidence in support of the existence of peripheral opioid receptors.

Keywords: Buprenorphine, post-operative analgesia, peripheral opioid receptors


How to cite this article:
Mehta TR, Parikh BK, Bhosale GP, Butala BP, Shah VR. Post operative analgesia after incisional infiltration of bupivacaine v/s bupivacaine with buprenorphine. J Anaesthesiol Clin Pharmacol 2011;27:211-4

How to cite this URL:
Mehta TR, Parikh BK, Bhosale GP, Butala BP, Shah VR. Post operative analgesia after incisional infiltration of bupivacaine v/s bupivacaine with buprenorphine. J Anaesthesiol Clin Pharmacol [serial online] 2011 [cited 2019 May 27];27:211-4. Available from: http://www.joacp.org/text.asp?2011/27/2/211/81835


   Introduction Top


Opioids are more efficacious in inflammed tissues. Clinical trials have however not demonstrated consistent benefit with use of peripherally administered opioids in acute pain, except in intra-articular injection during surgery. The efficacy of opioids in inflammed tissue can possibly be used advantageously for management of post-operative pain. The aim of this study was to evaluate the hypothesis that combination of local anesthetic and opioid when injected in inflammed tissue can improve the quality of analgesia. [1],[2]


   Materials and Methods Top


Forty ASA I and II adult patients scheduled for elective donor nephrectomy were enrolled in a randomized double blind prospective study after the hospital ethics committee approval and written informed consent. The study exclusion criteria included use of opioids during 24 h prior to study, drug, or alcohol abuse and H/O allergy to any of the study drug. Aconventional balanced general anesthesia was administered. The induction protocol was standard for all patients and consisted of intravenous administration of glycopyrrolate (0.2 mg), fentanyl (2 μg/kg), thiopentone sodium (5-7mg/ kg), succinylcholine (1.5 mg/kg), and vecuronium (4 mg). Anesthesia was maintained with a mixture of nitrous oxide and oxygen, isoflurane, and supplements of vecuronium. Donor nephrectomy was performed in kidney position with 11 th rib flank incision. The patients were randomly assigned to either of the two groups A and B (n= 20 patients each) by the closed envelope method.

At the end of the surgery in group A patients, the wound was infiltrated intradermally with bupivacaine 0.5% (2 mg/kg) and in group B infiltration was done with bupivacaine 0.5% (2 mg/kg) + buprenorphine (2 μg/kg). The solutions were diluted up to 20 cc with distilled water and given in two coded syringes to the surgeon for infiltration. All patients were given diclofenac 75 mg IM half an hour before extubation and at 8 h interval in the post-operative period. Post-operative pain was assessed by a blinded investigator using a 0-10 point Visual Analogue Scale (0-no pain, 10-unbearable pain). VAS > 4 was taken to indicate significant pain and used as a cut off point for rescue analgesia with tramadol 50 mg IV. Both the groups were compared for duration of analgesia (time from wound infiltration to time of administration of first analgesic) and total consumption of supplemental analgesic in 24 h. Signs of opioid side effects like drowsiness, nausea, vomiting, and pruritus were noted. Urinary retention was not evaluated as all the patients were catheterized.

Assuming the increase in duration of analgesia to be 8-10 h [3],[4] a sample size ≥ 7 would give the study a power of 90% with type I error 0.05. So we conducted this study with 20 patients in each group. A comparison of the mean levels of all variables between two groups was made by the unpaired t test. Differences were considered statistically significant if P < 0.05.


   Results Top


The study groups were comparable in terms of age, weight, M:F ratio, and duration of surgery [Table 1].
Table 1: Demographic data

Click here to view


Mean VAS scores were significantly lower in group B as compared to group A [Figure 1]. In group A, 10% patients required rescue analgesic within 0-6 h, 40% in 6-12 h, 45% in 12-18 h, and 50% of patients in 18-24 h. In group B, 5% patients required analgesia within 0-6 h, 5% in 6-12 h, and 15% in 18-24 hours [Figure 2]. Addition of buprenorphine enhanced the duration of analgesia in group B and the total dose of rescue analgesic used was significantly higher in group A patients [Table 2]. None of the patients had any opioid-related side effects like nausea, vomiting, pruritus, and drowsiness.
Table 2: Rescue analgesic requirement

Click here to view
Figure 1: Comparison of mean VAS scores

Click here to view
Figure 2: Rescue analgesic requirement (percentage of patients)

Click here to view



   Discussion Top


Post-operative pain arises from the interplay of three factors.

  1. Impulses generated from injured nerve fibers innervating the site of incision/retraction/sutures.
  2. Inflammatory mediators which are elevated at the surgical site and sensitize uninjured and injured nerve fibers.
  3. Sensitization of pain transmitting circuits in the spinal cord which increases their responsiveness to painful and non-painful stimuli.
The trauma of incision, compression, and stretch from surgical retraction induces impulse firing in peripheral neurons. Tissue damage, bleeding, and release of chemo-attractants from injury sites will foster local inflammation. It also stimulates keratinocytes (the predominant cells of skin) which leads to secretion of cytokines and other neuro-active agents causing sensitivity of peripheral tissues and nociception. [5] Blocking of these peripheral nerves innervating the surgical site by local infiltration is a traditional approach for post-operative pain control.

Traditionally, it is believed that opioids exert their analgesic effect by acting exclusively in the CNS. However, evidence has been mounting that reveals a peripheral opioid action on receptors without central action raising the possibility of divorcing analgesic action from unwanted central side effects. Many clinical studies concerning the analgesic efficacy of peripheral opioids have been published but the results are conflicting and various mechanisms are proposed for activation of opioid receptors on peripheral neurons. [2]

  1. Opioids increase potassium current and decrease calcium current in the cell bodies of sensory neurons. This inhibits the neuronal firing and transmitter release as well as the calcium-dependent release of excitatory pro-inflammatory compounds (e.g. substance P) which contributes to their analgesic and anti-inflammatory actions.
  2. Opioid anti-nociceptive effect is particularly prominent in inflamed tissue as follows.

    1. Inflammation disrupts the perineurium (normally an impermeable membrane) and facilitates the passage of corticotrophin-releasing hormones (CRH), interleukin 1B, and other cytokines. These substances apparently stimulate the release of opioid peptides from immune cells which activate opioid receptors on the sensory nerve endings leading to anti-nociception.
    2. Inflammation also enhances the peripherally directed axonal transport of opioid receptors (DRG→periphery) which leads to receptor upregulation (increase in their number in peripheral nerve terminals). Also the previously inactive opioid receptors become active in an inflamed tissue enhancing the analgesic potential of opioids. [2]


This anti-nociceptive effect can further be improved by a concomitant administration of local anesthetic like bupivacaine because they further increase the perineural permeability. Local anesthetics can also inhibit inflammatory and local sensitizing responses by directly suppressing some phases of inflammation like neutrophil priming and by blocking some of the neuronal pathways which are activated by inflammation that is protein kinase C and G protein-coupled receptors. [5]

The physiochemical properties of opioids play an important role in their ability to penetrate axonal myelin and the nerve membrane. We chose buprenorphine as it is a very lipid soluble compound (5 times > morphine) with great analgesic potency, high affinity for μ receptors (50 times > morphine), [6] and relatively long half life. It has an excellent safety profile such as ceiling effect for respiratory depression, lack of immunosuppressive effect, low pharmacokinetic interaction potential, and no accumulation in renal impairment. Moreover, former doubts on antagonism of respiratory effects by naloxone have been disproved and buprenorphine effect can be antagonized with continuous infusion of naloxone. Use of buprenorphine is increasing as it gives a smoother and longer analgesia. [6]

In our study, the mean duration of analgesia was prolonged in the buprenorphine group post-operatively which significantly decreased the requirement of supplemental analgesics. Similar effect was observed by the study of Bazin et al. where the duration of analgesia produced by a combination of buprenorphine and a local anesthetic for brachial plexus block was around 20 h. [3] Similarly, Likar et al. demonstrated that morphine added to a local anesthetic for submucous infiltration in dental surgery resulted in improved post-operative analgesia up to 24 h. [7] Tverskovy et al. also proved that addition of fentanyl for wound infiltration prolonged duration of anesthesia by 50% and decreased the intensity of spontaneous pain. [8] Similar prolongation of post-operative analgesia was seen in the study of Gao et al., who compared a combination of bupivacaine and buprenorphine with bupivacaine alone by caudal blockade for post-operative pain after hip and knee arthroplasty and the mean morphine consumption was halved in the buprenorphine group. [4]

The lack of major side effects was noteworthy. Systemic and spinal administration of buprenorphine for post-operative analgesia is limited by the side effects such as respiratory depression, pruritus, nausea, vomiting, and urinary retention. None of our patients had these side effects.


   Conclusion Top


Adding buprenorphine to local anesthetic can significantly enhance the quality of post-operative analgesia. This peripheral action of opioids particularly in inflamed tissue provides support for the existence of peripheral opioid receptors and gives a new approach to pain management which may have great clinical benefits.

 
   References Top

1.Rittner HL, Brack A, Stein C. Pain and the immune system. Br J Anaesth 2008;101:40-4.  Back to cited text no. 1
[PUBMED]  [FULLTEXT]  
2.Stein C. The control of pain in peripheral tissue by opioids. N Engl J Med 1995;332:1685-90.  Back to cited text no. 2
[PUBMED]  [FULLTEXT]  
3.Bazin JE, Massoni C, Bruelle P, Fenies V, Groslier D, Schoeffler P. The addition of opioids to Local Anaesthetics in brachial plexus block: The comparative effects of morphine, buprenorphine and sufentanil. Anaesthesia 1997;52:858-62.  Back to cited text no. 3
[PUBMED]    
4.Gao F, Waters B, Seager J, Dowling C, Vickers MD. Comparison of bupivacaine plus buprenorphine with bupivacaine alone by caudal blockade for post operative pain relief after hip and knee arthroplasty. Eur J Anaesthesiol 199512:471-6.  Back to cited text no. 4
    
5.Strichartz GR. Novel ideas of local anaesthetic actions on various ion channels to ameliorate post operative pain. Br J Anaesth 2008;101:45-7.  Back to cited text no. 5
[PUBMED]  [FULLTEXT]  
6.Stoelting RK. Opioid Agonists and Anatagonists. In: Pharmacology and Physiology in Anaesthetic Practice. 3 rd ed, Philadelphia, New York: Lippincott - Raven Publishers; 1999:77-112.  Back to cited text no. 6
    
7.Likar R, Sittl R, Gragger K, Pipam W, Blatnig H, Breschan C, et al. Peripheral morphine analgesia in dental surgery. Pain 1998;76:145- 50  Back to cited text no. 7
    
8.Tverskoy M, Braslavsky A, Mazor A, Ferman R, Kissin I. The peripheral effect of fentanyl on post operative pain. Anesth Analg 1998;87:1121-4  Back to cited text no. 8
    


    Figures

  [Figure 1], [Figure 2]
 
 
    Tables

  [Table 1], [Table 2]


This article has been cited by
1 Addition of buprenorphine to local anesthetic in adductor canal blocks after total knee arthroplasty improves postoperative pain relief: a randomized controlled trial
Sandeep H. Krishnan,Lisa A. Gilbert,Farhad Ghoddoussi,Daniel J. Applefield,Safa S. Kassab,Terry A. Ellis
Journal of Clinical Anesthesia. 2016; 33: 432
[Pubmed] | [DOI]
2 Buprenorphine added to bupivacaine prolongs femoral nerve block duration and improves analgesia in patients undergoing primary total knee arthroplasty a randomised prospective double-blind study
Juliusz Kosel,Piotr Bobik,Andrzej Siemiatkowski
The Journal of Arthroplasty. 2014;
[Pubmed] | [DOI]
3 Effectiveness of butorphanol as an adjuvant to lidocaine for haematoma or periosteal block: A prospective, randomised, double blind study
Shaik, N.A. and Rao, S.S. and Chiruvella, S. and Rao, M.S. and Reddy, S.V.
Indian Journal of Anaesthesia. 2013; 57(2): 150-155
[Pubmed]
4 A randomized, placebo-controlled, double-blind study of the analgesic efficacy of extraperitoneal wound instillation of bupivacaine and morphine in abdominal surgeries
Shadangi, B.K. and Garg, R. and Pandey, R.
Anaesthesia, Pain and Intensive Care. 2012; 16(2): 169-173
[Pubmed]



 

Top
 
  Search
 
    Similar in PUBMED
   Search Pubmed for
   Search in Google Scholar for
 Related articles
    Access Statistics
    Email Alert *
    Add to My List *
* Registration required (free)  

 
  In this article
    Abstract
    Introduction
    Materials and Me...
    Results
    Discussion
    Conclusion
    References
    Article Figures
    Article Tables

 Article Access Statistics
    Viewed2734    
    Printed156    
    Emailed2    
    PDF Downloaded591    
    Comments [Add]    
    Cited by others 4    

Recommend this journal