Users Online: 1079 Home Print this page Email this page Small font sizeDefault font sizeIncrease font size  
Home | About us | Editorial board | Search | Ahead of print | Current issue | Archives | Submit article | Instructions | Subscribe | Contacts | Login 


RSACP wishes to inform that it shall be discontinuing the dispatch of print copy of JOACP to it's Life members. The print copy of JOACP will be posted only to those life members who send us a written confirmation for continuation of print copy.
Kindly email your affirmation for print copies to dranjugrewal@gmail.com preferably by 30th June 2019.

 

 
Table of Contents
LETTER TO THE EDITOR
Year : 2011  |  Volume : 27  |  Issue : 4  |  Page : 573-574

Authors' reply


Department of Anaesthesiology, Division of Neuroanaesthesia, Institute of Medical Sciences, Banaras Hindu University, Varanasi, Uttar Pradesh, India

Date of Web Publication24-Oct-2011

Correspondence Address:
L D Mishra
Department of Anaesthesiology, Division of Neuroanaesthesia, Institute of Medical Sciences, Banaras Hindu University, Varanasi - 221 005, Uttar Pradesh
India
Login to access the Email id

Source of Support: None, Conflict of Interest: None


DOI: 10.4103/0970-9185.86620

Rights and Permissions

How to cite this article:
Mishra L D, Pradhan S K, Pradhan C S. Authors' reply. J Anaesthesiol Clin Pharmacol 2011;27:573-4

How to cite this URL:
Mishra L D, Pradhan S K, Pradhan C S. Authors' reply. J Anaesthesiol Clin Pharmacol [serial online] 2011 [cited 2019 Oct 14];27:573-4. Available from: http://www.joacp.org/text.asp?2011/27/4/573/86620

Sir,

We are happy to read the views and the opinion expressed by the reader [1] about some aspect of our article. [2] Our response to some of the concerned issues is as below:

Regarding hemodynamic monitoring, the heart rate and blood pressure were measured every minute, starting just before induction until surgical incision and 10 minutes thereafter till completion of surgery. It was removed from the final manuscript as it was a relatively lengthy table. In propofol group, though the heart rate was >20% below baseline, there was lesser variation in heart rate intraoperatively than in the isoflurane group. Hemodynamic profile in propofol group was thus better than the isoflurane group.

Regarding comparison of emergence, we compared the time for eye opening and time taken to reach an Aldrete score of 9. Aldrete score contains parameters like consciousness and motor activity. So, eye opening, consciousness, and motor activity are reasonably enough parameters to compare emergence.

We used a single isoflurane vaporizer for all cases in control group. Isoflurane consumed per case was calculated by dividing total isoflurane used in the vaporizer with total number of cases anesthetized. Indeed, it was a rough estimate, but we could not find any better and more practical method to calculate the isoflurane dose. The surgery was performed by same neurosurgical team, time required was nearly identical (as shown in the relevant observations in the manuscript) in most cases. In propofol group, we calculated the cost of the propofol used. We did not consider the amount of propofol that remained in the syringe after operation, because that was used in next patient, after changing the connecting tubing to avoid wastage of the drug. We routinely use midazolam 30 mcg/kg intravenous 3 minutes before starting administration of propofol in all cases. We titrated the infusion dose of propofol according to bispectral index scores, which were kept in a range of 40 to 60.

 
   References Top

1.Malde AD. Comparison of propofolbased anesthesia to conventional inhalational general anesthesia for spine surgery-Few queries. J Anaesth Clin Pharmacol 2011;27:573.  Back to cited text no. 1
  Medknow Journal  
2.Mishra LD, Pradhan SK, Pradhan CS. Comparison of Propofol Based Anaesthesia to Conventional Inhalational General Anaesthesia for Spine Surgery. J Anaesth Clin Pharmacol 2011;27:59-61.  Back to cited text no. 2
[PUBMED]  Medknow Journal  



This article has been cited by
1 Design and Implementation of an Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (ERAS) Program for Minimally Invasive Lumbar Decompression Spine Surgery
Ellen M. Soffin,Avani S. Vaishnav,Douglas S. Wetmore,Lauren Barber,Patrick Hill,Catherine Himo Gang,James D. Beckman,Todd J. Albert,Sheeraz A. Qureshi
SPINE. 2019; 44(9): E561
[Pubmed] | [DOI]
2 Total intravenous anaesthesia versus inhaled anaesthetics in neurosurgery?
Alix Zuleta-Alarcón,Karina Castellón-Larios,María Claudia Niño-de Mejía,Sergio D. Bergese
Colombian Journal of Anesthesiology. 2015; 43: 9
[Pubmed] | [DOI]



 

Top
 
  Search
 
    Similar in PUBMED
   Search Pubmed for
   Search in Google Scholar for
    Access Statistics
    Email Alert *
    Add to My List *
* Registration required (free)  

 
  In this article
    References

 Article Access Statistics
    Viewed908    
    Printed57    
    Emailed0    
    PDF Downloaded180    
    Comments [Add]    
    Cited by others 2    

Recommend this journal