Users Online: 304 Home Print this page Email this page Small font sizeDefault font sizeIncrease font size  
Home | About us | Editorial board | Search | Ahead of print | Current issue | Archives | Submit article | Instructions | Subscribe | Contacts | Login 
 

 
Table of Contents
ORIGINAL ARTICLE
Year : 2012  |  Volume : 28  |  Issue : 3  |  Page : 339-343

Efficacy of the subcostal transversus abdominis plane block in laparoscopic cholecystectomy: Comparison with conventional port-site infiltration


North Bristol NHS Trust, Bristol, United Kingdom

Date of Web Publication11-Jul-2012

Correspondence Address:
S Tolchard
Southmead Hospital, North Bristol NHS Trust, Southmaed Road, Bristol, BS10 5NB
United Kingdom
Login to access the Email id

Source of Support: None, Conflict of Interest: None


DOI: 10.4103/0970-9185.98331

Rights and Permissions
  Abstract 

Background: Pain experienced following laparoscopic cholecystectomy is largely contributed by the anterior abdominal wall incisions. This study investigated whether subcostal transversus abdominis (STA) block was superior to traditional port-site infiltration of local anesthetic in reducing postoperative pain, opioid consumption, and time for recovery.
Materials and Methods: Forty-three patients presenting for day case laparoscopic cholecystectomy were randomly allocated to receive either an ultrasound-guided STA block (n = 21) or port-site infiltration of local anesthetic (n = 22). Visual analog pain scores were measured at 1 and 4 h postoperatively to assess pain severity, and opioid requirement was measured in recovery and up to 8 h postoperatively. The time to discharge from recovery was recorded.
Results: STA block resulted in a significant reduction in serial visual pain analog score values and significantly reduced the fentanyl requirement in recovery by >35% compared to the group that received local port-site infiltration (median 0.9 vs. 1.5 ΅cg/kg). Furthermore, STA block was associated with nearly a 50% reduction in overall 8-h equivalent morphine consumption (median 10 mg vs. 19 mg). In addition, STA block significantly reduced median time to discharge from recovery from 110 to 65 min.
Conclusion: The results suggest that STA block provides superior postoperative analgesia and reduces opioid requirement following laparoscopic cholecystectomy. It may also improve theater efficiency by reducing time to discharge from the recovery unit.

Keywords: Subcostal block, laparoscopic cholecystectomy, analgesia, regional anaesthesia


How to cite this article:
Tolchard S, Davies R, Martindale S. Efficacy of the subcostal transversus abdominis plane block in laparoscopic cholecystectomy: Comparison with conventional port-site infiltration. J Anaesthesiol Clin Pharmacol 2012;28:339-43

How to cite this URL:
Tolchard S, Davies R, Martindale S. Efficacy of the subcostal transversus abdominis plane block in laparoscopic cholecystectomy: Comparison with conventional port-site infiltration. J Anaesthesiol Clin Pharmacol [serial online] 2012 [cited 2019 May 25];28:339-43. Available from: http://www.joacp.org/text.asp?2012/28/3/339/98331


  Introduction Top


Laparoscopic cholecystectomy is a common minimally invasive procedure which is increasingly performed in the day case unit. [1] Pain experienced following laparoscopic cholecystectomy derives significantly from the incisions made in the anterior abdominal wall [2] which has segmental innervation provided by nociceptor afferents in the transversus abdominis fascial plane [3] between the internal oblique and transversus abdominis muscles. Although neuroaxial blockade and intraperitoneal lavage of local anesthetic [4],[5],[6] have been used successfully to reduce opioid use and improve postoperative analgesia, the operation is usually performed under general anesthesia with port-site infiltration of local anesthetic and supplementary opioid analgesia.

Recently, the uses of peripheral axial blocks that deliver local anesthetic into the transversus abdominis fascial plane have become popular for operations that involve incision(s) of the abdominal wall. Thus, the transversus abdominis plane (TAP) block has been shown to reduce perioperative opioid use in elective abdominal surgery, [7] including open appendicectomy, [8] laparotomy, [9] cesarean section, [10] and laparoscopic cholecystectomy. [6] However, the efficacy of the TAP block is reportedly only reliable in providing analgesia below the umbilicus. [11],[12] In the one study [6] in which it was used for postoperative analgesia following laparoscopic cholecystectomy, the port sites were moved to facilitate the regional distribution of the block.

The ultrasound-guided subcostal transversus abdominis (STA) block is a recently described variation on the TAP block which produces reliable unilateral supraumbilical analgesia. [12] The present study was designed to evaluate the analgesic efficacy of STA block in reducing postoperative pain, opioid consumption, and recovery time following elective laparoscopic cholecystectomy.


  Materials and Methods Top


The study was sponsored by the hospital trust and approved by the local research ethics committee. Written informed consent was gained from 43 ASA I/II adult (>16 years old) patients listed for elective laparoscopic cholecystectomy; patient characteristics and details of anesthesia and surgery are summarized in [Table 1]. Emergency patients were excluded as were those with allergy to local anesthetic agents, skin conditions precluding the block, or preoperative chronic dependence upon opioid medication. Based upon these exclusion criteria, only one patient was not eligible for the study.
Table 1: Patient characteristics, standardized doses (mean ± SEM) of anesthesia and analgesia, and dose and volume (mean ± SEM) of local anesthesia in the port-site infiltration (n = 22) and STA block (n = 21) groups

Click here to view


Patients were blinded to the treatment group, as was the anesthetist involved in postoperative data collection. A standardized general anesthetic regime was employed, consisting of propofol (2.5 mg/kg), fentanyl (3 mcg/kg), and atracurium (0.6 mg/kg), with intraoperative non-opioid analgesia of paracetamol (15-20 mg/kg) and diclofenac (0.5 mg/kg) [Table 1]. A sealed envelope randomization system was employed to allocate patients to receive either an STA block (n = 21) or local anesthetic infiltration of the laparoscopy port sites (n = 22) using a standardized dose of 1 mg/kg bupivacaine hydrochloride (Marcain, Astra Zeneca UK) using sterile technique. Three subcostal and one periumbilical port sites were employed in all cases. The volume and dose of local anesthetic did not differ between the groups [Table 1]. The STA block was performed by one of two anesthetists with expertise in ultrasound-guided axial blocks, whereas port-site infiltration was performed by the surgeon. The block was performed under ultrasound guidance (Sonosite iLook, Sonosite Inc., Bothwell, UT, USA). The probe was placed in the midline of the abdomen 2 cm below the xiphisternum and moved right laterally along the subcostal margin to the anterior axillary line. The transversus abdominis muscle was identified lying beneath and extending lateral to the rectus abdominis muscle. A 100-mm, 22-G Stimuplex block needle was then guided, in plane, to a point just inferior to the right costal margin at the anterior axillary line such that the tip lay between the transversus abdominis and internal oblique muscle within the neurovascular fascial plane. Following aspiration, 1 mg/kg bupivacaine was deposited within the plane. Port-site infiltration was performed postoperatively in the usual manner using the same quantities and the dose of local anesthetic was divided equally between port sites [Table 1].

Postoperatively, patients were transferred to the recovery unit. Recovery nurses, who were blinded to the group intervention, were however told that the patients had received local anesthetic for patient safety purposes. In the recovery unit, patients received intravenous fentanyl analgesia in 20 mcg boluses. Administration of a bolus of fentanyl was triggered by pain described as moderate or severe when asked about their pain intensity on a scale of mild, moderate, or severe. The criteria for discharge from the recovery unit were pain control (absent or mild pain), absence of nausea and vomiting, hemodynamic stability, and alert or appropriately responsive to voice. On discharge, all patients had achieved a modified Aldrete score of ≥9. [13] Following discharge from the recovery unit, the patients were transferred to the day case ward where their analgesic requirements were satisfied on request with oral weak opioids and non-opioid analgesia. In the ward, analgesia requirement was checked at 20-min intervals and moderate to severe pain was treated.

Outcome data were collected by a third anesthetist who was blind to the treatment group of individual patients. The quality of analgesia was determined by comparing visual pain analog scores (VPAS) preoperatively and at 1 and 4h postoperatively. Opioid requirement was examined in a number of ways: the dose of fentanyl (mcg/kg) required in the recovery unit, individual postoperative analgesic requirement on the day case ward, and the overall 8-h equivalent morphine dose which was calculated as the morphine dose equivalent to the opioid analgesia consumed (using opioid:morphine equivalents of 100 mcg i.v. fentanyl to 7 mg i.v. morphine; 60 mg oral codeine to 6 mg i.v. morphine; 100 mg oral tramadol to 10 mg i.v. morphine). [14] These outcome measures were chosen to reflect common practice of employing opioid analgesia of varying strengths as dictated by the WHO analgesia ladder. In order to improve the accuracy of data concerning recovery time, the time recorded was the difference between admission time and the time the criteria for discharge were achieved (see methods).

Statistical analysis was performed using SPSS software. The Shapiro-Wilk test was employed to determine whether data sets differed from a normal distribution. Normally distributed data was analyzed using a repeat-measures general linear model analysis of variance (ANOVA), whereas non-normally distributed data were analyzed using the Mann-Whitney U-test and the Chi-squared test. The sample size of 21 per group was calculated assuming a 30% reduction in opioid use to provide 90% power at a significance level of 5%. The 30% assumed reduction was a conservative estimate based upon prior studies which show 45-70% reductions in postoperative morphine requirement following TAP blockade. [6],[7],[8],[9],[10],[11]


  Results Top


Patient data and details of the anesthesia and local anesthesia administered to each study group are shown in [Table 1]. No statistical differences were found in the parameters presented for each group in [Table 1] (NS, Mann-Whitney U-test).

VPAS measurements were performed in order to assess the quality of analgesia achieved in the study groups. Statistical comparison showed that STA block was associated with lower postoperative pain scores (P < 0.01, ANOVA) [Figure 1]. Lower pain scores were accompanied by lower analgesic requirement in the STA group. In the recovery unit, the number of patients in each group who required fentanyl analgesia was not significantly different [Table 2]. However, patients who received the STA block required significantly less fentanyl analgesia than those who received local port-site infiltration (median 0.9 vs. 1.5 mcg/kg, P < 0.05, Mann-Whitney U-test) [Figure 2]a. Following discharge from the recovery unit to the day case ward, there were no differences between the groups in the requirements for morphine, tramadol, or non-opioid analgesic medication. Two patients (one from each group) could not be satisfied by oral analgesics and they received intramuscular morphine for breakthrough pain. However, overall, the 8-h equivalent morphine dose in the patients who received an STA block was significantly less than in those who received port-site infiltration of local anaesthetic (median 9.2 mg vs. 16.8 mg, P < 0.01, Mann-Whitney U-test) [Figure 2]b. Significantly fewer patients in the STA group received codeine phosphate postoperatively (P < 0.01, Chi-squared test) and the amount of codeine required in this group was significantly less (P < 0.01, independent t-test) [Table 2].
Table 2: Opioid analgesic requirement (±SEM) in the 8-h post-laparoscopic cholecystectomy in patients who received either STA block or port-site infiltration of local anesthetic (LA)

Click here to view
Figure 1: STA block (open circles) significantly reduced serial VPAS (mean ± SEM) following laparoscopic cholecystectomy compared with patients who received local port-site infiltration (filled circles; P < 0.01, ANOVA)

Click here to view
Figure 2: (a) The distribution of fentanyl doses (open circles) in patients who received STA block (n = 21) or port-site infiltration of local anesthetic (n = 22). (b) The distribution of equivalent morphine doses (open circles) in patients who received STA block (n = 21) or port-site infiltration of local anesthetic (n = 22) (Median doses shown as filled circles. The n values in parentheses indicate the number of patients with the same values in a particular group.)

Click here to view


In addition to a reduction in postoperative pain and analgesic requirement, STA block was also associated with reduced recovery time [Figure 3]. Median time to discharge from recovery in patients who received an STA block was 65 min compared with 110 min in the group that received port-site infiltration (P < 0.005, Mann-Whitney U-test). The reduction in recovery discharge time was not offset by increased anesthetic and operative times, which did not significantly differ between the treatment groups [Table 1].
Figure 3: STA block reduces median time to discharge from the recovery unit following laparoscopic cholecystectomy compared with patients who received local port-site infiltration (***P < 0.005, Mann-Whitney U-test). The central box covers the interquartile range enclosing a line representing the median. The whiskers extend to the 10th and 90th percentiles and extreme values are plotted separately (filled circles)

Click here to view



  Discussion Top


Good postoperative analgesia is an important component of adequate perioperative care. It is associated with improved outcome, a reduction in perioperative stress, improved patient satisfaction, and coupled with a reduction in opioid consumption, fewer adverse side effects. [15],[16] The present study suggests that STA block reduces pain, opioid consumption, and recovery time following elective laparoscopic cholecystectomy.

To our knowledge, this is the first report of the efficacy of STA block in elective laparoscopic cholecystectomy surgery and, whilst the data suggest a significant benefit of the procedure compared to conventional port-site infiltration with local anesthetic, the study has a number of limitations. The extent of the block in each group was not tested. The anesthetists and surgeons administering local anesthetic were not blind to the treatment; however, neither group was involved in subsequent data collection. The study is also limited in that data were collected only up until 8 h postoperatively as it was envisaged at the outset that day case patients would be discharged by this point. It is also noteworthy that the post-incisional port-site infiltration was employed in this study. Pre-incisional infiltration is also a recognized analgesic technique for laparoscopic cholecystectomy; however, its efficacy compared with STA block has not been investigated and may be superior.

The demonstrated analgesic efficacy of STA block in elective laparoscopic cholecystectomy is consistent with prior studies that demonstrate reduction in opioid analgesic requirement and reduced pain scores following TAP block in appendicectomy, cesarean section, and laparoscopic cholecystectomy. [5],[6],[7],[8],[9],[10],[11] It was reported previously that the TAP block results in similar reductions in opioid use; [6] however, this study necessitated adjustment of the port-site positions to facilitate the anatomical distribution of the block [11],[12] and postoperative analgesia was limited to sufentanil. In contrast to this and other studies, [6],[7],[8],[9],[10],[11] the outcome measures in the present study were considered to better reflect current postoperative analgesia practice where a range of non-opioid, weak, and strong opioid analgesics are employed, as per WHO analgesic ladder a . STA block significantly reduced intravenous fentanyl requirement in the recovery unit and the overall equivalent morphine dose postoperatively. There were no differences between groups in either non-opioid analgesic dose or the doses of anesthetic agent that might have contributed to postoperative analgesia in these patient groups.

The improved quality of the postoperative analgesia associated with STA block further supports a growing body of evidence that TAP block is superior to traditional infiltration techniques. [6],[7],[8],[9],[10],[11],[12] This study also showed the additional benefit of a reduced recovery time in patients who received STA blocks whilst not impacting significantly on anesthetic or operation duration. This effect on efficiency is a significant finding, in particular, in hospitals such as ours, where recovery units have limited bed spaces and that are likely to see greater numbers of day case laparoscopic cases in future. [1]

Finally, it is noteworthy that there were no complications of STA block in the present study; however, the study was not powered to investigate this. All blocks were performed under ultrasound guidance which has the advantage of visualization of needle position in relation to the transversus neurovascular plane and real-time image of the site at which local anesthetic is deposited. In this regard, the study is in keeping with the growing body of opinion that ultrasonic guidance may be safer in the conduction of neural blockade. [17]

In summary, the present study provides further evidence that STA block can produce effective analgesia for upper abdominal laparoscopic surgery. [6],[7],[8],[9],[10],[11] Furthermore, it effectively reduces opioid analgesic requirement in elective laparoscopic cholecystectomy and reduces the burden of these patients on recovery services. It is noteworthy that these effects were achieved with basic ultrasound devices, unilateral blocks, and single injection STA blocks. The use of bilateral blocks, multiple injection sites, or implanted catheters may further improve on the present findings. [11],[18] Future studies to evaluate the analgesic efficacy and recovery benefits of axial blocks for all abdominal laparoscopic techniques would also be of interest.


  Acknowledgments Top


We are grateful to the WCLRN for providing the infrastructure funding for this project Dr S Fitzjohn for statistical advice and contributions.

 
  References Top

1.NHS Institute for Innovation and Improvement. Delivering Quality and Value: Focus on Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy. DH, London, 2006.  Back to cited text no. 1
    
2.Wall PD, Melzack R. Pain measurements in persons in pain: In: Wall PD, Melzak R, editors. Textbook of Pain. 4 th Edition: Churchill Livingstone, 1999. p. 409-26.  Back to cited text no. 2
    
3.McMinn RH. Lasts Anatomy. 9 th Edition: Churchill Livingstone, London, 1998.  Back to cited text no. 3
    
4.Boddy AP, Metha S, Rhodes M. The effect of intraperitoneal local anaesthesia in laparoscopic cholecystectomy: A systematic review. Anesth Analg 2006;103:62-8.  Back to cited text no. 4
    
5.Erol DD, Yilmaz S, Polat C, Arikan Y. The efficacy of thoracic epidural analgesia in laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Adv Therap 2008;25:45-52.  Back to cited text no. 5
[PUBMED]  [FULLTEXT]  
6.El-Dawlatly AA, Turkistani A, Kettner SC, Machata AM, Delvi MB, Thallaj A, et al. Ultrasound guided transversus abdominis plane block: description of a new technique and comparison with conventional systemic analgesia during laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Br J Anaesth 2009;102:763-7.  Back to cited text no. 6
[PUBMED]  [FULLTEXT]  
7.Kadam RV, Field JB. Ultrasound-guided continuous transverse abdominis plane block for abdominal surgery. J Anaesthesiol Clin Pharmacol 2011;27:333-6.  Back to cited text no. 7
[PUBMED]  Medknow Journal  
8.Niraj G, Searle A, Mathews M, Misra V, Baban M, Kiani S, et al. Analgesic efficacy of ultrasound-guided transversus abdominis plane block in patients undergoing open appendicectomy. Br J Anaesth 2009;103:601-5.  Back to cited text no. 8
[PUBMED]  [FULLTEXT]  
9.Mc Donnell JG, O'Donnell B, Curley G, Heffernan A, Power C, Laffey JG. The analgesic efficacy of transversus abdominis plane block after abdominal surgery: A prospective randomized controlled trial. Anesth Analg 2007;104:193-7.  Back to cited text no. 9
    
10.Mc Donnell JG, Curley G, O'Donnell B, Heffernan A, Power C, Laffey JG. The analgesic efficacy of transversus abdominis plane block after caesarean section: A prospective randomized controlled trial. Anesth Analg 2008;106:186-91.  Back to cited text no. 10
    
11.Shibata Y, Sato Y, Fujiwara Y, Komatsu T. Transversus abdominis plane block. Anesth Analg 2007;105:883.  Back to cited text no. 11
[PUBMED]  [FULLTEXT]  
12.Hebbard P. Subcostal transversus abdominal plane block under ultrasound guidance. Anesth Analg 2008;106:674-75.  Back to cited text no. 12
[PUBMED]  [FULLTEXT]  
13.Aldrete JA. Modification to post anaesthesia score for use in ambulatory surgery. J Perianaesth Nurs 1998;13:148-55.  Back to cited text no. 13
[PUBMED]  [FULLTEXT]  
14.Sasada M, Smith S. Drugs in anaesthesia and intensive care. 3 rd ed. Oxford: Oxford University Press; 2003.  Back to cited text no. 14
    
15.Wu C.L. Correlation of post-operative pain to quality of recovery in the immediate post-operative period. Regional Anaesth Pain Med 2005;30:516-22.  Back to cited text no. 15
    
16.Kehlet H. Surgical stress: The role of pain and analgesia. Br J Anaesth 1989;63:189-95.  Back to cited text no. 16
[PUBMED]  [FULLTEXT]  
17.Marhofer P, Harrop-Griffith W, Wilksche H, Kirchmair L. Fifteen years of ultrasound guidance in regional anaesthesia. Part 2. Recent developments in block techniques. Br J Anaesth 2010;104:673-83.  Back to cited text no. 17
    
18.Barrington MJ, Ivanusic JJ, Rozen WM, Hebbard P. Spread of injectate after ultrasound-guided transversus abdominis plane block: a cadaveric study. Anaesthesia 2009;64:745-50.  Back to cited text no. 18
[PUBMED]  [FULLTEXT]  


    Figures

  [Figure 1], [Figure 2], [Figure 3]
 
 
    Tables

  [Table 1], [Table 2]


This article has been cited by
1 Evidence-based management of pain after laparoscopic cholecystectomy: a PROSPECT review update
A.W.H. Barazanchi,W.S. MacFater,J-L. Rahiri,S. Tutone,A.G. Hill,G.P. Joshi,H. Kehlet,S. Schug,M. Van de Velde,M. Vercauteren,P. Lirk,N. Rawal,F. Bonnet,P. Lavandæhomme,H. Beloeil,J. Raeder,E. Pogatzki-Zahn
British Journal of Anaesthesia. 2018;
[Pubmed] | [DOI]
2 Local infiltration versus laparoscopic-guided transverse abdominis plane block in laparoscopic cholecystectomy: double-blinded randomized control trial
Rohan C. Siriwardana,Sumudu K. Kumarage,Bhagya M. Gunathilake,Suchintha B. Thilakarathne,Jeevani S. Wijesinghe
Surgical Endoscopy. 2018;
[Pubmed] | [DOI]
3 Laparoscopic-assisted Tranversus Abdominis Plane (TAP) Block Versus Ultrasonography-guided Transversus Abdominis Plane Block in Postlaparoscopic Cholecystectomy Pain Relief
Niranjan T. Ravichandran,Sarath C. Sistla,Pankaj Kundra,S. Manwar Ali,Baskaran Dhanapal,Indira Galidevara
Surgical Laparoscopy, Endoscopy & Percutaneous Techniques. 2017; 27(4): 228
[Pubmed] | [DOI]
4 Essentials of Our Current Understanding
Ki Jinn Chin,John G. McDonnell,Brendan Carvalho,Aidan Sharkey,Amit Pawa,Jeffrey Gadsden
Regional Anesthesia and Pain Medicine. 2017; 42(2): 133
[Pubmed] | [DOI]
5 O bloqueio do plano transverso abdominal subcostal pode melhorar a analgesia após colecistectomia laparoscópica
Vladimir Vrsajkov,Nedjica Mancic,Dunja Mihajlovic,Suzana Tonkovic Milicevic,Arsen Uvelin,Jelena Pantic Vrsajkov
Brazilian Journal of Anesthesiology. 2017;
[Pubmed] | [DOI]
6 Subcostal Transverse Abdominis Plane Block for Acute Pain Management: A Review
Jose M Soliz,Ian Lipski,Shannon Hancher-Hodges,Barbra Bryce Speer,Keyuri Popat
Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine. 2017; In Press(In Press)
[Pubmed] | [DOI]
7 Subcostal transversus abdominis plane block can improve analgesia after laparoscopic cholecystectomy
Vladimir Vrsajkov,Nedjica Mancic,Dunja Mihajlovic,Suzana Tonkovic Milicevic,Arsen Uvelin,Jelena Pantic Vrsajkov
Brazilian Journal of Anesthesiology (English Edition). 2017;
[Pubmed] | [DOI]
8 Management of a centenarian who underwent emergency laparoscopic cholecystectomy under general anesthesia with subcostal transversus abdominis plane block
Yoshiyuki Nagamine,Kohei Godai,Hiroshi Oki,Yuichi Kanmura
JA Clinical Reports. 2016; 2(1)
[Pubmed] | [DOI]
9 The Analgesic Efficacy of Ultrasound-Guided Transversus Abdominis Plane Block in Adult Patients
Moira Baeriswyl,Kyle R. Kirkham,Christian Kern,Eric Albrecht
Anesthesia & Analgesia. 2015; 121(6): 1640
[Pubmed] | [DOI]
10 Is transverse abdominis plane block effective following local anesthetic infiltration in laparoscopic totally extraperitoneal hernia repair?
Mun Gyu Kim,Soon Im Kim,Si Young Ok,Sang Ho Kim,Se-Jin Lee,Sun Young Park,Jae-Hwa Yoo,Ana Cho,Kyung Yul Hur,Myung Jin Kim
Korean Journal of Anesthesiology. 2014; 67(6): 398
[Pubmed] | [DOI]
11 Eficacia analgésica del bloqueo del plano transverso del abdomen ecoguiado-revisión sistemática
Javier Ripollés Melchor,Sandra Marmaña Mezquita,Alfredo Abad Gurumeta,José María Calvo Vecino
Brazilian Journal of Anesthesiology (Edicion en Espanol). 2014;
[Pubmed] | [DOI]
12 Eficácia analgésica do bloqueio ecoguiado do plano transverso do abdome – Revisão sistemática
Javier Ripollés Melchor,Sandra Marmaña Mezquita,Alfredo Abad Gurumeta,José María Calvo Vecino
Brazilian Journal of Anesthesiology. 2014;
[Pubmed] | [DOI]
13 Analgesic efficacy of the ultrasound-guided blockade of the transversus abdominis plane – a systematic review
Javier Ripollés Melchor,Sandra Marmaña Mezquita,Alfredo Abad Gurumeta,José María Calvo Vecino
Brazilian Journal of Anesthesiology (English Edition). 2014;
[Pubmed] | [DOI]



 

Top
 
  Search
 
    Similar in PUBMED
   Search Pubmed for
   Search in Google Scholar for
 Related articles
    Access Statistics
    Email Alert *
    Add to My List *
* Registration required (free)  

 
  In this article
   Abstract
  Introduction
   Materials and Me...
  Results
  Discussion
  Acknowledgments
   References
   Article Figures
   Article Tables

 Article Access Statistics
    Viewed3305    
    Printed91    
    Emailed3    
    PDF Downloaded688    
    Comments [Add]    
    Cited by others 13    

Recommend this journal