Users Online: 857 Home Print this page Email this page Small font sizeDefault font sizeIncrease font size  
Home | About us | Editorial board | Search | Ahead of print | Current issue | Archives | Submit article | Instructions | Subscribe | Contacts | Login 
 
ORIGINAL ARTICLE
Year : 2013  |  Volume : 29  |  Issue : 4  |  Page : 503-508

Intrathecal ketorolac enhances intrathecal morphine analgesia following total knee arthroplasty


Department of Biomechanics, Medicine and Rehabilitation of Members, Teaching Hospital, School of Medicine of Ribeirão Preto, University of São Paulo, Brazil

Correspondence Address:
Gabriela R Lauretti
Rua Maestro Joaquim Rangel, 644, Ribeirão Preto São Paulo - 14025 610
Brazil
Login to access the Email id

Source of Support: The work was conducted at the Teaching Hospital of the Faculty of Medicine of Ribeirão Preto, University of São Paulo, with the funding of the Pain Clinic from the same Institution, Conflict of Interest: None


DOI: 10.4103/0970-9185.119155

Rights and Permissions

Background: Total knee arthroplasty represents one of the most painful surgeries. The aim of the study was to compare analgesia and adverse effects of intrathecal (IT) ketorolac versus IT morphine, versus the combination of IT ketorolac and morphine. Materials and Methods: After ethical approval and patient consent, 80 patients undergoing knee arthroplasty were randomized to one of 4 groups. All groups received 15 mg IT bupivacaine plus IT test drug (2 ml). The control group (CG) received saline as IT test drug. The morphine group (MG) received IT 200 g morphine, the ketorolac group (KG) IT 2 mg ketorolac and the morphine-ketorolac group (MKG) 200 g morphine + 2 mg ketorolac as test drugs. Pain and adverse effects were evaluated. P < 0.05 was considered significant. Results: The MG and KG were similar in their times to time to first rescue analgesic (440 ± 38 min and 381 ± 44 min, respectively). Both groups were longer when compared to the CG (170 ± 13 min) (P < 0.01). The MG and KG had lesser ketoprofen consumption compared to the CG (P < 0.05). The time to first rescue analgesic was longer to the MKG (926 ± 222 min) (15 h) compared to CG (P < 0.001) and to the MG and the KG (P < 0.01). MKG displayed lesser ketoprofen consumption compared to MG and KG (P < 0.05) and to the CG (P < 0.02). Conclusions: The data suggest a role for spinal ketorolac and morphine in orthopaedic surgery because this combination of agents provided 15 h of analgesia compared to 7 h after each drug alone, with no significant side-effects.


[FULL TEXT] [PDF]*
Print this article     Email this article
 Next article
 Previous article
 Table of Contents

 Similar in PUBMED
   Search Pubmed for
   Search in Google Scholar for
 Related articles
 Citation Manager
 Access Statistics
 Reader Comments
 Email Alert *
 Add to My List *
 * Requires registration (Free)
 

 Article Access Statistics
    Viewed1885    
    Printed49    
    Emailed3    
    PDF Downloaded490    
    Comments [Add]    
    Cited by others 6    

Recommend this journal