Users Online: 1037 Home Print this page Email this page Small font sizeDefault font sizeIncrease font size  
Home | About us | Editorial board | Search | Ahead of print | Current issue | Archives | Submit article | Instructions | Subscribe | Contacts | Login 


RSACP wishes to inform that it shall be discontinuing the dispatch of print copy of JOACP to it's Life members. The print copy of JOACP will be posted only to those life members who send us a written confirmation for continuation of print copy.
Kindly email your affirmation for print copies to dranjugrewal@gmail.com preferably by 30th June 2019.

 

 
Table of Contents
LETTER TO EDITOR
Year : 2014  |  Volume : 30  |  Issue : 1  |  Page : 124-125

Life-threatening severe sepsis following stapled hemorrhoidopexy


1 Department of Anaesthesiology and Critical Care Medicine, G.S.V.M. Medical College, Kanpur, Uttar Pradesh, India
2 Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, G.S.V.M. Medical College, Kanpur, Uttar Pradesh, India
3 Department of Social & Preventive Medicine, G.S.V.M. Medical College, Kanpur, Uttar Pradesh, India

Date of Web Publication24-Jan-2014

Correspondence Address:
Bikram Kumar Gupta
Room No. 39, New Married Hostel, L.L.R. Hospital, G.S.V.M. Medical College, Kanpur, Uttar Pradesh
India
Login to access the Email id

Source of Support: None, Conflict of Interest: None


DOI: 10.4103/0970-9185.125737

Rights and Permissions

How to cite this article:
Agarwal A, Gupta BK, Agarwal S, Bhagoliwal A, Pandey K. Life-threatening severe sepsis following stapled hemorrhoidopexy. J Anaesthesiol Clin Pharmacol 2014;30:124-5

How to cite this URL:
Agarwal A, Gupta BK, Agarwal S, Bhagoliwal A, Pandey K. Life-threatening severe sepsis following stapled hemorrhoidopexy. J Anaesthesiol Clin Pharmacol [serial online] 2014 [cited 2019 Oct 23];30:124-5. Available from: http://www.joacp.org/text.asp?2014/30/1/124/125737

Sir,

A 59-year-old hypertensive, non-diabetic male was admitted for stapled hemorrhoidopexy (SH) following a long history of rectal bleeding and associated prolapsing piles. He was receiving tablet metoprolol 50 mg and tablet amlodipine 5 mg since 2 years. On examination, he had 4 th degree piles with a large external component. All pre-operative investigations were within the normal limit. Prophylactic antibiotics in the form of ceftriaxone and gentamycin were administered 30 min prior to surgery. A standard SH was performed under spinal anesthesia, but due to difficulty in closure some part of the hemorrhoids were also excised. During the intraoperative period, the patient felt uneasiness and some discomfort, hence was sedated with midazolam 1mg, but his mean arterial pressure (MAP) fell below 65 mm of Hg. He remained hypotensive for 10-12 min which was managed by administration of Ringer lactate 500 ml and tetrastarch 500 ml.This resulted in stabilisation of mean arterial pressure (MAP) above 70 mm Hg. A total amount of fluid administered during the intraoperative period was 1300 ml. Patient was shifted to the post-operative ward after completion of surgery. After 2 h of surgery, the patient complained of pain at the operative site. Intranasal butorphanol nasal spray 1 mg was administered to relieve the pain. Rest of the post-operative period on that day was uneventful. The patient did not pass urine until the morning of the next day. He also felt generalized weakness and breathlessness. At around 3 pm of the next post-operative day, his BP started falling to a MAP below 60 mm Hg despite administering 1L of 0.9% normal saline and hence he was shifted to intensive care unit within half an hour of developing hypotension. He did not pass urine until 4 pm inspite of being adequately hydrated and his BP at that time was 70 mm of Hg systolic. A central line was inserted and central venous pressure (CVP) guided fluid therapy started. We targeted a CVP of around 10 mm of Hg. Arterial blood gas (ABG) analysis was carried out and oxygen was administered through venturi mask at 6 L/min. Monitoring of non-invasive BP, pulse rate, heart rate, SpO 2 , temperature, continuous CVP, Urine output and abdominal girth was done. Patient's vitals at that time were: Temperature-102°F, BP 74 mm of Hg (systolic), pulse rate 134 bpm, respiratory rate 32/min, SpO 2 78% on 6 L/min O 2 through mask, decreased air entry in both lung; fine crepts present, abdominal distension present, but no tenderness, and bowel sounds were absent. Urinary catheterization was performed. Electrocardiogram revealed sinus tachycardia; cardiac markers were sent and were within the normal limits

At the same time, infusions of noradrenaline and dopamine were started. All routine investigations with coagulation profile and serum procalcitonin levels were also sent for early recognition of sepsis ABG report revealed metabolic acidosis with low pO 2 (pO 2 51.9 mm of Hg, pCO 2 37.8 mm of Hg, pH 7.27,HCO3 - 17.5 mmol/L, BE - 8.7 mmol/L). Non-invasive, biphasic positive airway pressure ventilation started through mask. Blood cultures and fungal staining were sent. Injection meropenem 2 g intravenous (IV) was administered over 1 h followed by 1 g in 100 ml NS over 1 h twice a day, injection teicoplanin 400 mg IV stat then 400 mg once daily on alternate day (blood urea- 69 mg/dl, serum creatinine-3.7 mg/dl) and injection metronidazole 500 mg IV three times daily were also started. After few hours of starting vasopressors (maintaining MAP about 60-70 mm Hg) patient passed urine about 50 ml in 1 h. Sequential organ failure assessment Score was 14.

As the patient's coagulation profile was deranged, so 6 units of fresh frozen plasma were transfused over 48 h. Chest physiotherapy, nebulization and general nursing care was instituted aggressively. Patient's hemodynamic parameters, urine output and ABG gradually improved, so we tapered the dose of noradrenaline and dopamine gradually. Intermittent oxygen inhalation was provided through Hudson mask. After 4 days of treatment, gradually the patient improved and was able to maintain his vitals without any support. He was shifted to room care and was discharged after nine days without any permanent sequelae.

Over the years, a number of cases of overwhelming sepsis have occurred as a consequence of the surgical treatment of hemorrhoids, in some cases proving fatal. From 2000 to the present, 29 articles reporting complications in 40 patients were identified. [1] Thirty-five patients underwent laparotomy with fecal diversion and further patients were treated by low anterior resection. A specific complication was rectal perforation with peritonitis. Factors that led to life-threatening sepsis were identified in 30 patients. Despite surgical treatment and resuscitation, there were four deaths. [1] Three patients succumbed to sepsis in the immediate post-operative period, one on the post-operative day 4 after SH, second on the post-operative day 6 after SH and the third on the post-operative day10 after SH. [2] SH seems to be elective and easy procedure, but devastating complications can occur within 24 h. SH has resulted in potential serious morbidity and even mortality in the immediate postoperative period. [2]

The cause of severe sepsis and retroperitoneal sepsis associated with both surgical and non-surgical treatment of hemorrhoids remains uncertain. [3] It has been postulated that stapling itself may allow bacterial entry into the peri-rectal region. Full-thickness wall stapling may also allow the organism to reach the peri-rectal space. [4] Two cases have been reported in which patients developed severe, life-threatening complications. Incomplete rings (doughnuts) of excised rectal tissue were noted in both patients. [2],[5] This could be a causative factor in our patient too, because difficulty in closure may have resulted in excision of some part of rectal tissue. There is no standard treatment for sepsis after SH and several different approaches have been used. [4] In our case, we recognized this life-threatening problem in an earlier phase and managed conservatively with non-invasive ventilation, appropriate antibiotics and general supportive and nursing care. Therefore, the presence of unexpectedly severe pain, respiratory distress, hypotension and urinary difficulties appear to be useful alarms for the presence of life-threatening perineal sepsis following treatment for hemorrhoids.

Our case report depicts that although SH is a simple, elective procedure for an experienced surgeon, but life-threatening complications can occur within 24 h of surgery. As anesthetists and intensivists, we should be aware of this complication and it's alarming signs and symptoms.

 
  References Top

1.Faucheron JL, Voirin D, Abba J. Rectal perforation with life-threatening peritonitis following stapled haemorrhoidopexy. Br J Surg 2012;99:746-53.  Back to cited text no. 1
[PUBMED]    
2.Cirocco WC. Life threatening sepsis and mortality following stapled hemorrhoidopexy. Surgery 2008;143:824-9.  Back to cited text no. 2
[PUBMED]    
3.Gao XH, Wang HT, Chen JG, Yang XD, Qian Q, Fu CG. Rectal perforation after procedure for prolapse and hemorrhoids: Possible causes. Dis Colon Rectum 2010;53:1439-45.  Back to cited text no. 3
[PUBMED]    
4.vanWensen RJ, van Leuken MH, Bosscha K. Pelvic sepsis after stapled hemorrhoidopexy. World J Gastroenterol 2008;14:5924-6.  Back to cited text no. 4
    
5.Fazio VW. Early promise of stapling technique for haemorrhoidectomy. Lancet 2000;355:768-9.  Back to cited text no. 5
[PUBMED]    




 

Top
 
  Search
 
    Similar in PUBMED
   Search Pubmed for
   Search in Google Scholar for
    Access Statistics
    Email Alert *
    Add to My List *
* Registration required (free)  

 
  In this article
   References

 Article Access Statistics
    Viewed1173    
    Printed19    
    Emailed0    
    PDF Downloaded317    
    Comments [Add]    

Recommend this journal