|Year : 2015 | Volume
| Issue : 1 | Page : 115-118
Pediatric retroperitoneoscopic nephrectomy: An initial experience of 15 cases
Souvik Maitra1, Puneet Khanna1, Dalim Kumar Baidya1, Dilip Kumar Pawar1, Minu Baipai2, Shasanka Shekhar Panda2
1 Department of Anaesthesiology and Intensive Care, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, New Delhi, India
2 Department of Paediatric Surgery, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, New Delhi, India
|Date of Web Publication||3-Feb-2015|
Dr. Dalim Kumar Baidya
Department of Anaesthesiology and Intensive Care, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, New Delhi - 110 029
Source of Support: None, Conflict of Interest: None
Retroperitoneoscopic approach of nephrectomy in pediatric patients is a debatable issue from surgical point of view. Experience of anesthetic management of 15 such patients from a tertiary care teaching hospital has been described here. We found that capno-retroperitoneum increases end-tidal carbon-di-oxide, but normocapnea was achieved in the most of the patients. No significant hemodynamic changes were noted in any patients. However, subcutaneous emphysema was common, but self-limiting without any serious consequence. Postoperative pain after this procedure is usually manageable by nonopioid analgesics.
Keywords: Capno-retroperitoneum, pediatrics, retroperitoneoscopy
|How to cite this article:|
Maitra S, Khanna P, Baidya DK, Pawar DK, Baipai M, Panda SS. Pediatric retroperitoneoscopic nephrectomy: An initial experience of 15 cases. J Anaesthesiol Clin Pharmacol 2015;31:115-8
|How to cite this URL:|
Maitra S, Khanna P, Baidya DK, Pawar DK, Baipai M, Panda SS. Pediatric retroperitoneoscopic nephrectomy: An initial experience of 15 cases. J Anaesthesiol Clin Pharmacol [serial online] 2015 [cited 2020 Jun 2];31:115-8. Available from: http://www.joacp.org/text.asp?2015/31/1/115/150560
| Introduction|| |
Minimally invasive nephrectomy can be performed by either a trans-peritoneal or retroperitoneal approach. Though reported long ago,  the benefits and risks of nephrectomy in pediatric patients through a retroperitoneoscopic approach is still controversial. Classically retroperitoneal approach is believed to be associated with less postoperative ileus and early return of bowel function. Capno-retroperitoneum has been associated with more carbon-di-oxide absorption with consequent hypercarbia. However, recently retroperitoneoscopic approach has been found to be at least as safe as open approaches for pediatric nephrectomies and associated with much less postoperative pain.  Clinical data from an anesthesiologist's point of view on the management of capno-retroperitoneum and management of these patients is sparse. However, both animal  and human  studies have observed significantly differing hemodynamic and respiratory effects of carbon-di-oxide insufflation in peritoneum and retroperitoneum. Practicing anesthesiologists must be aware about the respiratory and hemodynamic changes of capno-retroperitoneum for safe management of such patients.
We hereby report our initial experience on anesthetic management and perioperative course of consecutive 15 children posted for retroperitoneoscopic nephrectomy in a tertiary care teaching hospital in India.
| Materials and Methods|| |
After obtaining written informed consent, we prospectively collected anesthesia data of consecutive fifteen retroperitoneoscopic nephrectomies performed during the period of July 2012 to June 2013. The following parameters were noted from the records: Demographics, indication of surgery, preoperative clinical and investigation data, intraoperative anesthesia management, hemodynamic and ventilation parameters, surgical notes, postoperative analgesia, and any intraoperative or postoperative complications.
There were nine males and six females with median age of 7 years range (4.5-9 years). In 7 cases, nephroureterectomy was done in left side and in right side in 8 cases. Indication of surgery was nonfunctioning kidney in all cases. Preoperative physical examination and laboratory investigations were within normal limit in all patients. Mean operating time was 80 min (range 50-120 min). One was converted to open because of pyonephrotic kidney with severe adhesions due to previous surgery. Demographic profile of patients has been provided in [Table 1].
|Table 1: Demographic details of the patients; data expressed as mean (SD), median (range) or proportions|
Click here to view
All patients had intravenous cannula in situ in the preoperative period. Anesthesia was induced with injection fentanyl 2 mcg/kg, propofol 2-3 mg/kg and muscle relaxation was achieved by injection atracurium at a dose of 0.5 mg/kg. Endotracheal (ET) intubation was done in all cases by appropriate sized cuffed ET tube by McIntosh laryngoscope blade. Patients were placed in the lateral decubitus position with the side to be operated kept up. All cases were carried out by a single surgeon and he used three 5 mm port including one for camera. Maintenance of anesthesia was done by an air-oxygen-isoflurane technique targeting an end tidal concentration of isoflurane about 0.8-1.0 MAC and intermittent boluses of atracurium at 0.1 mg/kg. Intravenous morphine was given to all patients at a dose of 100 mcg/kg and intravenous paracetamol was given at a dose of 15 mg/kg before extubation. At the end of surgery, residual neuromuscular block was reversed by neostigmine-glycopyrolate and trachea were extubated when patients were fully awake.
Formation of capno-retroperitoneum
The initial rate of carbon-di-oxide insufflation was 2l/min in all cases and a pressure of 8-10 mm Hg was kept. CO 2 insufflation was done by a Karl Storz™ Endo-inflator (KARL STORZ GmbH & Co. KG, Tuttlingen, Germany).
Intraoperative ventilation protocol
All patients were ventilated by pressure limited volume control ventilation through a circle absorber system. Initially, a minute ventilation of 100 ml/kg was instituted. A limiting pressure was set at 30 cm H 2 O targeting an end-tidal carbon-di-oxide (EtCO 2 ) tension of 35-45 mm Hg. After institution of capno-retroperitoneum, initially minute ventilation was increased 15% and subsequently adjusted to maintain an EtCO 2 below 50 mm Hg.
In 11 of 15 patients, we were able to maintain an EtCO 2 below 50 mm Hg within the predefined peak pressure limit. In rest of the four patients, EtCO 2 went maximally up to 60 mm Hg and we did arterial blood gas analysis for these four patients. In three of the four patients we found mild respiratory acidosis. However, at the end of surgery, EtCO 2 again decreased within normal ranges after cessation of carbon-di-oxide insufflation.
Intraoperative hemodynamic parameters
Tachycardia (increase in heart rate >20% from baseline) and hypertension (increase in mean arterial pressure >20% from baseline) were noticed in 14 of 15 patients during institution of capno-retroperitoneum. However, both heart rate and blood pressure reached baseline within 10-15 min. In 1 patient, we noticed bradycardia up to 74/min which responded to temporary cessation of CO 2 insufflation. No other significant hemodynamic changes of any form in the intraoperative period that required intervention were noticed. A snap shot of intraoperative hemodynamic data have been provided in [Figure 1].
|Figure 1: Mean heart rate, mean arterial pressure and end-tidal carbon-di-oxide in the Intraoperative period (T_baseline: Baseline, Ti: At the time of induction of anesthesia, T10: 10 min after induction of anesthesia, T_pneumo: After creation of pneumo-peritoneum, T15, 30, 45, 60, 75 and 90: 15, 30, 45, 60 and 90 min after creation of pneumo-peritoneum)|
Click here to view
We noticed subcutaneous emphysema in 5 patients during surgery. Interestingly, in three of them, we found difficulty in maintaining normocarbia with a safe peak airway pressure limit. However, it was self-limiting in all patients and resolved completely within 8 h after surgery. We did not notice any pneumothorax or gas embolism in any of our patients.
Residual neuromuscular blockade were reversed by standard dosage of neostigmine and glycopyrolate and extubated when patients were fully awake. Tracheas of all patients were extubated in the operating room. No postoperative respiratory complications were noted in any patient. Port site local anesthetic infiltration with 0.2% ropivacaine was used in all patients at the end of surgery and all of them received intravenous paracetamol at a dose of 15 mg/kg QID for 48 h. Intravenous morphine 50 mcg/kg bolus was used as rescue analgesic. Six patients required at least one rescue morphine bolus in the initial 6 h of the postoperative period. Two patients required two boluses each. We performed a caudal block with 0.2% ropivacaine in cases which were converted to an open approach. In the postoperative period bowel sound returned in all patients by next day and oral feeding were started in all patients by 24 h.
All patients were followed until they were discharged from the hospital, and we did not notice any surgical complication in any patients.
| Discussion|| |
Urological surgeries in pediatric patients through retroperitoneal route are at least as favorable as trans-peritoneal approach from surgical point of view. Previous animal studies are not unanimous about CO 2 absorption through intra-peritoneal and retroperitoneal approach. Increased absorption through intra-peritoneal space  and similar absorption  through either route has been reported. Human studies have been conducted in adult patients and reported conflicting results. Kadam et al.  and Ng et al.  have reported a similar absorption of carbon-di-oxide in either route. However, Streich et al. in  2003 reported that retroperitoneal carbon dioxide insufflation causes more carbon dioxide absorption than intra-peritoneal insufflation. Previously Wolf et al.  in 2005 reported in a retrospective analysis that, extra-peritoneal CO 2 insufflation and subcutaneous emphysema were significantly associated with hypercarbia. Karsli et al.  found that EtCO 2 seem to increase progressively and gradually during retroperitoneal laparoscopy, in contrast to the plateau effect during trans-peritoneal laparoscopy. Similarly Lorenzo et al.  and Halachmi et al.  also found significant hemodynamic changes after capno-retroperitoneum. However, Nadu et al.  found that retroperitoneoscopy is associated with less hemodynamic changes that trans-peritoneal approach. They also found that increase in peak airway pressure is also less in retroperitoneal approach. In our series, we found that despite initial increase of EtCO 2 , normocarbia could be maintained with a safe peak airway pressure in most of the patients. It is most probably due to a less decrease in respiratory compliance by capno-retroperitoneum than capno-peritoneum as mentioned by Nadu et al.  However, where normocarbia was difficult to maintain, hypercarbia regressed after deflation of the capno-retroperitoneum and no other complications occurred. It is worth mentioning in this context, that no other clinical data on the effects of capno-retroperitoneum in pediatric patients exists in anesthesia literature. Giebler et al. in 1996 found that CO 2 insufflation in retroperitoneum does not cause any significant hemodynamic change other than an increase in central venous pressure. They also found that the procedure is safe and although there is significant increase in PaCO 2 , it was below 45 mm Hg. Incidence of subcutaneous emphysema in their series was 12.5%.
We also found that subcutaneous emphysema was the cause of hypercarbia in three of the 4 patients in whom normocarbia was difficult to maintain. It is also worth mentioning that subcutaneous emphysema is common in this procedure and it can happen any time after formation of capno-retroperitoneum. A high index of suspicion and vigilance is required to detect it early. We did not find any serious complications like pneumothorax or gas embolism in any patients.
| Conclusion|| |
Though significant hypercarbia may occur in pediatric patients during capno-retroperitoneum, it is usually safely manageable and associated with no serious complications at least in our small series. A randomized control trial is required in these patients to accurately delineate the effects of intra-peritoneal and retroperitoneal carbon-di-oxide insufflation. However, a thorough vigilance is required from our point to detect possible complications.
| References|| |
El-Ghoneimi A, Valla JS, Steyaert H, Aigrain Y. Laparoscopic renal surgery via a retroperitoneal approach in children. J Urol 1998;160:1138-41.
Miyano G, Takahashi T, Nakamura H, Doi T, Okawada M, Koga H, et al
. Retroperitoneoscopic nephrectomy/heminephrectomy in children planned, performed, and managed by supervised senior pediatric surgical trainees. J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A 2013;23:723-7.
Giebler RM, Kabatnik M, Stegen BH, Scherer RU, Thomas M, Peters J. Retroperitoneal and intraperitoneal CO2 insufflation have markedly different cardiovascular effects. J Surg Res 1997;68:153-60.
Giebler RM, Behrends M, Steffens T, Walz MK, Peitgen K, Peters J. Intraperitoneal and retroperitoneal carbon dioxide insufflation evoke different effects on caval vein pressure gradients in humans: Evidence for the starling resistor concept of abdominal venous return. Anesthesiology 2000;92:1568-80.
Baird JE, Granger R, Klein R, Warriner CB, Phang PT. The effects of retroperitoneal carbon dioxide insufflation on hemodynamics and arterial carbon dioxide. Am J Surg 1999;177:164-6.
Kadam PG, Marda M, Shah VR. Carbon dioxide absorption during laparoscopic donor nephrectomy: A comparison between retroperitoneal and transperitoneal approaches. Transplant Proc 2008;40:1119-21.
Ng CS, Gill IS, Sung GT, Whalley DG, Graham R, Schweizer D. Retroperitoneoscopic surgery is not associated with increased carbon dioxide absorption. J Urol 1999;162:1268-72.
Streich B, Decailliot F, Perney C, Duvaldestin P. Increased carbon dioxide absorption during retroperitoneal laparoscopy. Br J Anaesth 2003;91:793-6.
Wolf JS Jr, Monk TG, McDougall EM, McClennan BL, Clayman RV. The extraperitoneal approach and subcutaneous emphysema are associated with greater absorption of carbon dioxide during laparoscopic renal surgery. J Urol 1995;154:959-63.
Karsli C, El-Hout Y, Lorenzo AJ, Langer JC, Bägli DJ, Pippi Salle JL, et al.
Physiological changes in transperitoneal versus retroperitoneal laparoscopy in children: A prospective analysis. J Urol 2011;186:1649-52.
Lorenzo AJ, Karsli C, Halachmi S, Dolci M, Luginbuehl I, Bissonnette B, et al.
Hemodynamic and respiratory effects of pediatric urological retroperitoneal laparoscopic surgery: A prospective study. J Urol 2006;175:1461-5.
Halachmi S, El-Ghoneimi A, Bissonnette B, Zaarour C, Bagli DJ, McLorie GA, et al.
Hemodynamic and respiratory effect of pediatric urological laparoscopic surgery: A retrospective study. J Urol 2003;170:1651-4.
Nadu A, Ekstein P, Szold A, Friedman A, Nakache R, Cohen Y, et al.
Ventilatory and hemodynamic changes during retroperitoneal and transperitoneal laparoscopic nephrectomy: A prospective real-time comparison. J Urol 2005;174:1013-7.
Giebler RM, Walz MK, Peitgen K, Scherer RU. Hemodynamic changes after retroperitoneal CO2 insufflation for posterior retroperitoneoscopic adrenalectomy. Anesth Analg 1996;82:827-31.