Users Online: 824 Home Print this page Email this page Small font sizeDefault font sizeIncrease font size  
Home | About us | Editorial board | Search | Ahead of print | Current issue | Archives | Submit article | Instructions | Subscribe | Contacts | Login 


RSACP wishes to inform that it shall be discontinuing the dispatch of print copy of JOACP to it's Life members. The print copy of JOACP will be posted only to those life members who send us a written confirmation for continuation of print copy.
Kindly email your affirmation for print copies to dranjugrewal@gmail.com preferably by 30th June 2019.

 

 
Table of Contents
LETTER TO EDITOR
Year : 2016  |  Volume : 32  |  Issue : 2  |  Page : 267-268

Difficult airway: When deliberate is too close to improvisation


1 Department of Emergency, Anaesthesia and Intensive Care Section, "GB Morgagni-L. Pierantoni" Hospital, Forli, Italy
2 Department of Anesthesiology, University of Texas Medical School at Houston, Houston, TX, USA

Date of Web Publication10-May-2016

Correspondence Address:
Ruggero M Corso
Department of Emergency, Anaesthesia and Intensive Care Section, "GB Morgagni-L. Pierantoni" Hospital, Forli
Italy
Login to access the Email id

Source of Support: None, Conflict of Interest: None


DOI: 10.4103/0970-9185.168170

Rights and Permissions

How to cite this article:
Corso RM, Cattano D. Difficult airway: When deliberate is too close to improvisation . J Anaesthesiol Clin Pharmacol 2016;32:267-8

How to cite this URL:
Corso RM, Cattano D. Difficult airway: When deliberate is too close to improvisation . J Anaesthesiol Clin Pharmacol [serial online] 2016 [cited 2020 May 27];32:267-8. Available from: http://www.joacp.org/text.asp?2016/32/2/267/168170

Sir,

We read with interest the article by Kumar et al. [1] regarding a difficult airway rescue with the use of a modified open tracheostomy. The surgical airway is often used as a last resort for the rescue of a difficult airway. However, we would like to raise a few concerns about some critical points that the authors should have discussed in more detail:

  1. They described a patient with a known obstructing airway presenting to the hospital with respiratory distress. The most appropriate strategies for a predicted critical airway with impaired ventilation could have been or should have at least been considered: An awake bronchoscopic intubation, an awake tracheotomy or cricothyrotomy. [2] Based on the computed tomography scan, [Figure 2] of the report] the cricothyrotomy approach was not advisable, and an awake tracheostomy could have been challenging given the patient's inability to maintain supine positioning; at this point an awake fiberoptic flexible bronchoscopy could have been considered. Instead, two unsuccessful attempts of direct laryngoscopy were performed. At this point, it would be useful to know whether or not the patient experienced hypoxia during all these attempts. Furthermore, moving a patient with airway compromise to an operating theatre during such a period could have further exacerbated hypoxia. [3]
  2. A "planned" surgical tracheostomy was then attempted in the operating theater. A detailed explanation of why the surgeon was not able to perform the tracheostomy is not provided.
  3. During tracheostomy attempts, face mask ventilation became increasingly difficult, and the anesthesiologist decided to proceed with multiple direct laryngoscopies. A supraglottic airway device could have been fitted to enable ventilation/oxygenation and access for fiberoptic guided tracheal intubation, avoiding repeated laryngoscopic attempts known to be associated with poor outcome.
  4. Finally, a modified crico-tracheotomy was performed. How was the correct position of the tracheostomy confirmed?
In conclusion, the authors' key message that percutaneous tracheostomy has to be taken into consideration in a difficult airway is clinically rational, but based on their report not justifiable. [4] Besides the incidence of difficult cannula insertion/difficult dilation and failure to perform tracheostomy is low ranging from 15.5% to 4.9% depending on the technique used in elective conditions, [5] however in emergency situations multiple factors can aggravate the condition for a successful placement. In our opinion, this case provides important teaching points of common airway practices that are considered a failure in the required and clear airway strategy, including back-up plans in case of failure, limiting the number of intubation attempts to decrease the likelihood of airway trauma, effective preoxygenation to increase the time available to secure the airway before profound hypoxia occurs, availability of alternative techniques of laryngoscopy (e.g., videolaryngoscopy) to reduce the risk of a cannot intubate cannot ventilate scenario.

It is our opinion that is not the technique or device used, but the strategy adopted which is crucial in the management of an airway emergency (planning rather improvisation during escalating difficulty).

Financial support and sponsorship

Nil.

Conflicts of interest

There are no conflicts of interest.

 
  References Top

1.
Kumar M, Khanna A, Verma S, Jha A, Aggarwal S. Difficult tracheostomy in a case of difficult mask ventilation and difficult intubation? J Anaesthesiol Clin Pharmacol 2013;29:576-7.  Back to cited text no. 1
[PUBMED]  Medknow Journal  
2.
Law JA, Broemling N, Cooper RM, Drolet P, Duggan LV, Griesdale DE, et al. The difficult airway with recommendations for management - part 2 - the anticipated difficult airway. Can J Anaesth 2013;60:1119-38.  Back to cited text no. 2
    
3.
Cook TM, Woodall N, Harper J, Benger J, Fourth National Audit Project. Major complications of airway management in the UK: results of the Fourth National Audit Project of the Royal College of Anaesthetists and the Difficult Airway Society. Part 2: Intensive care and emergency departments. Br J Anaesth 2011;106:632-42.  Back to cited text no. 3
    
4.
Cattano D, Corso RM, Hagberg CA. Emergency percutaneous tracheostomy: Virtuosity versus advisability. Internet J Emerg Intensive Care Med 2013;13.  Back to cited text no. 4
    
5.
Cabrini L, Landoni G, Greco M, Costagliola R, Monti G, Colombo S, et al. Single dilator vs. guide wire dilating forceps tracheostomy: A meta-analysis of randomised trials. Acta Anaesthesiol Scand 2014;58:135-42.  Back to cited text no. 5
    




 

Top
 
  Search
 
    Similar in PUBMED
   Search Pubmed for
   Search in Google Scholar for
    Access Statistics
    Email Alert *
    Add to My List *
* Registration required (free)  

 
  In this article
   References

 Article Access Statistics
    Viewed1344    
    Printed51    
    Emailed0    
    PDF Downloaded250    
    Comments [Add]    

Recommend this journal