Users Online: 292 Home Print this page Email this page Small font sizeDefault font sizeIncrease font size  
Home | About us | Editorial board | Search | Ahead of print | Current issue | Archives | Submit article | Instructions | Subscribe | Contacts | Login 
 

 
Table of Contents
CASE REPORT
Year : 2017  |  Volume : 33  |  Issue : 3  |  Page : 399-401

Xylometazoline nasal drops induced anaphylaxis: An atypical perioperative complication


1 Department of Anaesthesiology, SGPGI, Lucknow, Uttar Pradesh, India
2 Department of Anaesthesia, Gian Sagar Medical College, Banur, Patiala, Punjab, India

Date of Web Publication11-Sep-2017

Correspondence Address:
Rudrashish Haldar
Department of Anaesthesiology, SGPGIMS, Rae Bareilly Road, Lucknow, UP, 226014
India
Login to access the Email id

Source of Support: None, Conflict of Interest: None


DOI: 10.4103/0970-9185.173331

Rights and Permissions
  Abstract 

Xylometazoline nasal drops used for nasal decongestion can have side-effect in the form of palpitation, hypertension, headache, and tremors. Anaphylaxis to xylometazoline nasal drops is a relatively unrecognized complication. We encountered a patient posted for tonsillectomy who developed serious anaphylaxis upon administration of a commercially available preparation of xylometazoline nasal drops and required aggressive management for stabilization. Further evaluation and literature search indicated toward the preservative (benzylalkonium chloride) as the cause of this adverse event.

Keywords: Anaphylaxis, benzylalkonium chloride, immunoglobulin E, xylometazoline nasal drops


How to cite this article:
Haldar R, Bajwa SS, Kaur J. Xylometazoline nasal drops induced anaphylaxis: An atypical perioperative complication. J Anaesthesiol Clin Pharmacol 2017;33:399-401

How to cite this URL:
Haldar R, Bajwa SS, Kaur J. Xylometazoline nasal drops induced anaphylaxis: An atypical perioperative complication. J Anaesthesiol Clin Pharmacol [serial online] 2017 [cited 2017 Sep 23];33:399-401. Available from: http://www.joacp.org/text.asp?2017/33/3/399/173331


  Introduction Top


Nasotracheal intubation is a commonly employed technique in intraoral, maxillofacial and dental surgeries. This entails prophylactic decongestion and lubrication (lignocaine or water soluble jelly) of the nasal mucosa so as to avoid bleeding from the capillaries following abrasion of the nasal mucosa. Commonly used decongestants include cocaine, oxymetazoline, xylometazoline, phenylephrine and in some cases cotton pledgets soaked in weak adrenaline solution. Xylometazoline is an alpha-adrenergic agonist which causes vasoconstriction of the nasal mucosa. Adverse effects of xylometazoline nasal drops include tremors, palpitations, hypertension, headache and light-headedness. We report a rare case where a patient developed anaphylaxis during preparation of the nasal mucosa with xylometazoline nasal drops most probably due to the preservative used in the drops.


  Case Report Top


A 23-year-old, previously healthy male patient was posted for tonsillectomy. Preanesthetic history revealed no known allergies. On arrival to the theater, the following monitors were connected-noninvasive blood pressure, pulse oxymetry and electrocardiograph. Baseline readings taken and intravenous access was secured. The patient was then administered xylometazoline nasal drops in the dosage of two drops in each nostril for nasal decongestion. Within 1 min as the preparations to administer premedicants were underway, the patient started complaining of generalized itching all over the body. Rashes started appearing over the chest, upper limbs [Figure 1] and abdomen [Figure 2] and the patient became dyspneic. This was followed by hypotension (96/56 mmHg), tachycardia (135 beats/min) and fall in oxygen saturation (92% on room air). Auscultation of the chest revealed bilateral wheeze.
Figure 1: Rashes over chest and upper limb

Click here to view
Figure 2: Rashes over the abdomen

Click here to view


A presumptive diagnosis of anaphylaxis was made, and supportive measures were immediately instituted. Oxygen was administered with face mask and injection hydrocortisone (100 mg), injection diphenhydramine (20 mg) and injection ranitidine (50 mg) were administered intravenously. Intravenous fluid (1 L normal saline) and phenylephrine (200 mcg) were given for persistent hypotension. This was followed by intravenous bolus of epinephrine (100 mcg) and continued with epinephrine infusion 0.2 mcg/kg/min. Patient was nebulized with a solution of salbutamol and steroid (budesonide) mixture and the preparations for intubation were undertaken. However, the patient started to respond favorably to the above conservative measures and saturation improved (97–98%) on face mask. Bronchospasm was significantly relieved in the next 10 min. Thus intubation was put on hold.

Surgery was deferred and the patient was shifted to the intensive care unit (ICU). Nebulization and fluid resuscitation continued in the ICU and the patient required epinephrine infusion (0.2 mcg/kg/min) for maintenance of hemodynamics. The epinephrine infusion was gradually tapered off in the next 8 h. A close watch on the patients clinical status was maintained especially for events like airway edema or recurrence (delayed “second wave”) of symptoms.[1] Samples for serum tryptase and immunoglobulin E (IgE) levels were sent from ICU and were found elevated (20 mcg/L) and within normal limits (145 IU/ml) respectively. After one day of uneventful ICU stay, the patient was shifted out to the ward. After 5 days, the patient was again posted for surgery and this time, nasal intubation was facilitated only by water based jelly and the anesthetic and perioperative course was unremarkable.

Six weeks after the event the patient was scheduled for skin testing (scratch and intradermal)[2] keeping resuscitative measures and drugs ready. A positive wheal and flare were noted with skin testing with the nasal decongestant (0.0001% solution) suggesting the presence of IgE antibodies. The patient was counseled regarding his condition and was advised to avoid drugs with similar compositions in the future.


  Discussion Top


Anaphylaxis is a fulminant, life-threatening, unexpected IgE-mediated allergic reaction with an incidence ranging from 1 in 3500 to 1 in 20,000 anesthetics[3] and involves multiple systems (cardiovascular, cutaneous and respiratory). A wide variety of agents has been implicated in the genesis of perioperative anaphylaxis such as antibiotics, muscle relaxants, colloids, latex, opioids, contrast, local anesthetics and aprotinine.[4]

The nasal drops which we used contained xylometazoline hydrochloride (0.1%) as the active ingredient and benzalkonium chloride (BAC) (0.011%) as the preservative. BAC is a quaternary ammonium compound, which is used as a preservative and bactericidal agent in medicinal drops (ophthalmic and nasal), nebulizers, gargles and cosmetics. BAC is notorious for unfavorable effects like contact sensitivity, bronchoconstriction,[5] anaphylaxis and angioneurotic edema.[6] Literature search revealed instances where BAC used in eye drops,[4] nebulizer solutions[7] and central venous catheters[7] have triggered anaphylaxis in susceptible individuals. Anaphylaxis initiated by BAC in nasal drops has been once reported previously during a mucosal detumescence (diagnostic) procedure.[8] However in this case the presentation was relatively less dramatic and the patient did not require ICU care or ionotropic support. Other adverse effects attributed to BAC include squamous metaplasia[8] aggravation of rhinitis medicamentosa, inhibition of neutrophil function[10] and ciliary toxicity.[11]

Anaphylaxis involves the binding of the allergen to the IgE present on the surface of the mast cells and basophils aided by receptor cross linkages. Ensuing cellular activation leads to release of vasoactive mediators such as histamine, leukotrienes, kinins and eosinophils which mediate bronchoconstriction, vasodilatation and increased capillary permeability. Sensitization caused by BAC is mediated commonly by TH2 lymphocytes which increases IgE and IgG1 in blood.[12] Nevertheless nonspecific histamine release from mast cells by surface activation is another presumed mechanism of this phenomenon.[4] In our case, based on the temporal clinical association of the event along with a positive skin test and elevated levels of serum tryptase, we concluded that the event was an anaphylactic reaction to the nasal drop preparation. Tryptase, a protease secreted by mast cells can be used as a marker of immune activation. A raised serum tryptase level signifies anaphylaxis even though a normal level does not excludes the diagnosis. Moreover, it cannot differentiate between anaphylaxis and anaphylactoid reactions.[13],[14] A normal IgG level in the patient indicated an absence of atopy. The diagnosis could have been concretely established with additional investigations like radioallergosorbent test[6] and basophil stimulation test and lymphocyte transformation test.[8] However, due to the technical limitations of our institution they could not be performed. Identifying antibodies (total IgE and specific IgE) is done for diagnosis of allergy. However, this method is not feasible in case of BAC as specific IgE to BAC is not available.[8]

In spite of its rarity perioperative anaphylaxis caused by BAC in nasal drops remains a potential possibility. Anesthesiologists should, therefore, be aware of this probable complication and should enquire regarding allergy to similar drugs and preparations during the preoperative assessment. As a safe dose of BAC for skin testing has not been established, in cases with a high propensity to develop anaphylaxis preservative, or additive free nasal drops should be used.

Financial support and sponsorship

Nil.

Conflicts of interest

There are no conflicts of interest.



 
  References Top

1.
Roizen MF, Fleisher LA. Anesthetic implications of concurrent diseases. In: Miller RD, editor. Anesthesia. 6th ed. Philadelphia: Elsevier; 2005. p. 1092-3.  Back to cited text no. 1
    
2.
Mertes PM, Laxenaire MC, Lienhart A, Aberer W, Ring J, Pichler WJ, et al. Reducing the risk of anaphylaxis during anaesthesia: Guidelines for clinical practice. J Investig Allergol Clin Immunol 2005;15:91-101.  Back to cited text no. 2
    
3.
Hepner DL, Castells MC. Anaphylaxis during the perioperative period. Anesth Analg 2003;97:1381-95.  Back to cited text no. 3
    
4.
Laxenaire MC, Mertes PM, Groupe d'Etudes des Réactions Anaphylactoïdes Peranesthésiques. Anaphylaxis during anaesthesia. Results of a two-year survey in France. Br J Anaesth 2001;87:549-58.  Back to cited text no. 4
    
5.
Kim SH, Ahn Y. Anaphylaxis caused by benzalkonium in a nebulizer solution. J Korean Med Sci 2004;19:289-90.  Back to cited text no. 5
    
6.
Anderson D, Faltay B, Haller NA. Anaphylaxis with use of eye-drops containing benzalkonium chloride preservative. Clin Exp Optom 2009;92:444-6.  Back to cited text no. 6
    
7.
Shih CK, Huang SH, Tsai CJ, Chu KS, Wu SH. Anaphylaxis to benzalkonium chloride-coated central venous catheter. J Clin Anesth 2010;22:632-4.  Back to cited text no. 7
    
8.
Mezger E, Wendler O, Mayr S, Bozzato A. Anaphylactic reaction following administration of nose drops containing benzalkonium chloride. Head Face Med 2012;8:29.  Back to cited text no. 8
    
9.
Berg OH, Lie K, Steinsvåg SK. The effects of topical nasal steroids on rat respiratory mucosa in vivo, with special reference to benzalkonium chloride. Allergy 1997;52:627-32.  Back to cited text no. 9
    
10.
Steinsvåg SK, Bjerknes R, Berg OH. Effects of topical nasal steroids on human respiratory mucosa and human granulocytes in vitro. Acta Otolaryngol 1996;116:868-75.  Back to cited text no. 10
    
11.
Riechelmann H, Deutschle T, Stuhlmiller A, Gronau S, Bürner H. Nasal toxicity of benzalkonium chloride. Am J Rhinol 2004;18:291-9.  Back to cited text no. 11
    
12.
Larsen ST, Hansen R, Poulsen OM, Nielsen GD. Adjuvant effect of benzalkonium chloride on the allergen-specific IgE, IgG1 and IgG2a antibody formation in BALB/cJ mice. Basic Clin Pharmacol Toxicol 2004;95:94-6.  Back to cited text no. 12
    
13.
Fisher MM, Baldo BA. Mast cell tryptase in anaesthetic anaphylactoid reactions. Br J Anaesth 1998;80:26-9.  Back to cited text no. 13
    
14.
Krøigaard M, Garvey LH, Menné T, Husum B. Allergic reactions in anaesthesia: are suspected causes confirmed on subsequent testing? Br J Anaesth 2005;95:468-71.  Back to cited text no. 14
    


    Figures

  [Figure 1], [Figure 2]



 

Top
 
  Search
 
    Similar in PUBMED
   Search Pubmed for
   Search in Google Scholar for
 Related articles
    Access Statistics
    Email Alert *
    Add to My List *
* Registration required (free)  

 
  In this article
   Abstract
  Introduction
  Case Report
  Discussion
   References
   Article Figures

 Article Access Statistics
    Viewed444    
    Printed114    
    Emailed0    
    PDF Downloaded101    
    Comments [Add]    

Recommend this journal