Users Online: 1104 Home Print this page Email this page Small font sizeDefault font sizeIncrease font size  
Home | About us | Editorial board | Search | Ahead of print | Current issue | Archives | Submit article | Instructions | Subscribe | Contacts | Login 
 
ORIGINAL ARTICLE
Year : 2017  |  Volume : 33  |  Issue : 4  |  Page : 462-466

Front of neck access: A survey among anesthetists and surgeons


1 Department of Anaesthesia, University Hospitals Coventry & Warwickshire NHS Trust, Coventry, UK
2 Department of Anaesthesia, Guy's and St Thomas' Hospital, London, UK
3 Department of Anaesthesia, Good Hope Hospital, Sutton Coldfield, UK
4 Department of Anaesthesia, Warwick Hospital, Warwick, UK
5 Department of Anaesthesia, Central Manchester Foundation Trust, Manchester, UK
6 Specialty Registrar, Warwickshire School of Anaesthesia, West Midlands, UK
7 Department of Statistics and Epidemiology, Warwick Medical School, University of Warwick, UK

Correspondence Address:
Emily Pallister
University Hospitals of Coventry and Warwickshire, Coventry, UK
UK
Login to access the Email id

Source of Support: None, Conflict of Interest: None


DOI: 10.4103/joacp.JOACP_109_17

Rights and Permissions

Background and Aims: Emergency front of neck access (FONA) is the final step in a Can't Intubate–Can't Oxygenate (CICO) scenario. In view of maintaining simplicity and promoting standardized training, the 2015 Difficult Airway Society guidelines recommend surgical cricothyroidotomy using scalpel, bougie, and tube (SBT) as the preferred technique. Material and Methods: We undertook a survey over a 2-week period to evaluate the knowledge and training, preferred rescue technique, and confidence in performing the SBT technique. Data were collected from both anesthetists and surgeons. Results: One hundred and eighty-nine responses were collected across four hospitals in the United Kingdom. The majority of participants were anesthetists (55%). One hundred and eleven (59%) respondents were aware of the national guidelines (96.2% among anesthetists and 12.9% among surgeons). Only 71 (37.6%) respondents indicated that they had formal FONA training within the last one year. Seventy-five anesthetists (72.8%) knew that SBT equipment was readily available in their department, while most surgeons (81.2%) did not know what equipment available. One hundred and five (55.5%) respondents were confident in performing surgical cricothyroidotomy in a situation where the membrane was palpable and only in 33 (17.5%) where the cricothyroid membrane was not palpable. Conclusion: This survey has demonstrated that despite evidence of good training for anesthetists in FONA, there are still shortfalls in the training and knowledge of our surgical colleagues. In an emergency, surgeons may be required to assist or secure an airway in a CICO situation. Regular multidisciplinary training of all clinicians working with anesthetized patients should be encouraged and supported.


[FULL TEXT] [PDF]*
Print this article     Email this article
 Next article
 Previous article
 Table of Contents

 Similar in PUBMED
   Search Pubmed for
   Search in Google Scholar for
 Related articles
 Citation Manager
 Access Statistics
 Reader Comments
 Email Alert *
 Add to My List *
 * Requires registration (Free)
 

 Article Access Statistics
    Viewed243    
    Printed4    
    Emailed0    
    PDF Downloaded78    
    Comments [Add]    

Recommend this journal