|Year : 2018 | Volume
| Issue : 3 | Page : 307-313
Effect of remifentanil on the recovery profile after head and neck surgeries: A prospective study
Thangavelautham Suhitharan1, Sudhakar Subramani2, Ma Thin Mar Win3, Widyawaty Binte Sulaiman1, Nurain Binte Johar1, Ong Biauw Chi1
1 Department of Anesthesiology, Singapore General Hospital, Singapore
2 Department of Anesthesiology, University of Iowa Hospitals and Clinics, Iowa, USA
3 Yong Loo Lin School of Medicine, National University of Singapore, Singapore
|Date of Web Publication||11-Oct-2018|
Department of Anesthesia, University of Iowa Hospitals and Clinics, Iowa
Source of Support: None, Conflict of Interest: None
Background and Aims: Development of opioid tolerance in the perioperative period due to remifentanil remains controversial. We evaluated occurrence of opioid tolerance and other adverse effects due to remifentanil in patients undergoing head and neck surgery.
Material and Methods: We recruited adult participants with ASA status I to III who received general anesthesia for approximately 2 h for elective head and neck procedures. Remifentanil infusion was used in one group and intermittent boluses of morphine or fentanyl were administered in another group. Postoperative pain was treated with intermittent boluses of morphine and fentanyl in post-anaesthesia care unit (PACU) to achieve a numerical rating scale score of 3. Opioid requirement was assessed as an indicator of opioid tolerance. Patients were also evaluated for time to discharge from PACU.
Results: We studied 222 adults aged between 21 and 80 years. One hundred and eleven patients received a combination of remifentanil infusion and morphine boluses, and another 111 patients received only fentanyl and/or morphine boluses intraoperatively. Fifty-one patients in the remifentanil group and 25 in the fentanyl/morphine group required opioids in the PACU. Opioid requirement were significantly more (mean ± SD, 44.98 ± 59.7 Vs 20.23 ± 46.66 mcg.kg−1; P = 0.001) and required longer time to discharge from PACU in the remifentanil group compared to the fentanyl/morphine group (Mean ± SD, 88.6 ± 39.5 min Vs 73.1 ± 38.4 min; P < 0.001). No difference in the incidence of adverse effects in two groups was noted.
Conclusion: At clinically relevant doses, intraoperative remifentanil infusion appears to increase opioid consumption in the immediate postoperative period. This can result in delayed discharge from PACU for patients undergoing elective head and neck procedures.
Keywords: Head and neck surgery, opioid tolerance, remifentanil
|How to cite this article:|
Suhitharan T, Subramani S, Win MT, Sulaiman WB, Johar NB, Chi OB. Effect of remifentanil on the recovery profile after head and neck surgeries: A prospective study. J Anaesthesiol Clin Pharmacol 2018;34:307-13
|How to cite this URL:|
Suhitharan T, Subramani S, Win MT, Sulaiman WB, Johar NB, Chi OB. Effect of remifentanil on the recovery profile after head and neck surgeries: A prospective study. J Anaesthesiol Clin Pharmacol [serial online] 2018 [cited 2019 Jan 22];34:307-13. Available from: http://www.joacp.org/text.asp?2018/34/3/307/243170
| Introduction|| |
Remifentanil is one of the most common short-acting opioids used for prolonged surgeries. Better pharmacokinetic profile allows easy titration to various surgical stimulations including pain and hemodynamic changes. It has also been widely used as a hypotensive anesthetic agent to minimize bleeding and for improved visualization of the operative region.,
Recent studies have shown that ultra-short acting opioids have been associated with increase in pain scores and analgesic requirements in the immediate postoperative period., The proposed molecular mechanisms for this observation involve the central glutaminergic system, spinal dynorphins, descending facilitation, genetic mechanisms, and decreased reuptake and enhanced nociceptive response. However, there are few contradictory reports on opioid-induced hyperalgesia, showing that intraoperative remifentanil infusion does not increase opioid consumption in the spine and colorectal surgeries., Furthermore, the effects of intraoperative use of remifentanil on recovery profile such as nausea, vomiting, shivering, incidence of respiratory depression, and the time to discharge from the post anesthesia care unit (PACU) has been inconsistent. Remifentanil has been widely used for head and neck surgeries to achieve hypotensive anesthesia to minimize the intraoperative blood loss. However, the effect of using intraoperative remifentanil infusion on the postoperative pain and analgesics requirements are not well described in head and neck surgeries. The goal of this prospective observational study was to identify the effect of intraoperative remifentanil infusion on PACU opioid usage and occurrence of significant adverse events compared to the intraoperative use of morphine/fentanyl in head and neck surgeries requiring at least 2 h.
| Material and Methods|| |
This prospective observational study was conducted among 222 adults aged between 21 and 80 years, over a period of six months in a single academic medical center. All patients were American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) physical status I to III and scheduled for elective head and neck surgery with a minimum expected duration of 2 h warranting general anesthesia. The methodology followed the international guidelines for observational studies, and was approved by the Sing Health centralized Institutional Review Board (CIRB), Singapore (ref no. 2011/421/D). The requirement for written informed consent was waived by the CIRB in view of the nature of the study. We obtained verbal consent from the patients prior to the procedure.
We believe observational study design would be pragmatic, and recruiting 222 patients for a randomized control design would have been a challenge in our clinical setting. Patients with a previous history of either drug or alcohol abuse, those who have been using opioids for a long time, any mental disorder with difficultly in understanding the pain scoring system, and surgical procedures warranting elective postoperative ventilation were excluded from this study. This study was not randomized and the choice of intraoperative opioid was left to the discretion of the staff anesthesiologist.
Our patients were not premedicated and were instructed about the 11-point numerical rating scale (NRS) prior to anesthesia induction. Upon arrival in the operating room, patients were monitored with ECG, noninvasive arterial pressure, and pulse oximetry. Induction of anesthesia was achieved with intravenous propofol 2.0–3.0 mg.kg−1 and remifentanil infusion at 0.5 mcg kg−1 min−1 initially for tracheal intubation. Remifentanil infusion was titrated to heart rate and blood pressure in the remifentanil group. Patients were also given morphine as intermittent boluses approximately 30–45 min prior to the anticipated end of surgery. The fentanyl/morphine group received intermittent boluses of morphine or fentanyl that was titrated by the attending anesthesiologist to surgical stimulation throughout the procedure. The choice of intraoperative opioid, dose of intraoperative opioids (both remifentanil and morphine/fentanyl) volatile agent, and muscle relaxants were left to the discretion of the staff anesthesiologist. Parameters including the type of inhalational anesthetic agent, method of airway establishment, duration of surgery, amount of remifentanil used (mcg.kg−1), and the amount of morphine or fentanyl (mcg.kg−1) were monitored throughout the surgical procedure.
Upon arrival to PACU, all patients were assessed for pain using NRS every 15 min until discharge from PACU. Intravenous morphine or fentanyl were used to treat the immediate postoperative pain in PACU till the NRS was less than or equal to 3, as per our institutional PACU acute pain management protocol. Maximum NRS, amount of morphine or fentanyl used for rescue analgesia, occurrence of either nausea or vomiting, and the antiemetic used were recorded every 15 min. The total opioids administered in PACU, duration of the PACU stay (defined by time since admission to decision made for discharge by PACU anesthesiologist), and occurrence of other potential side effects that influence the quality of recovery such as drowsiness, nausea, vomiting, shivering, and evidence of respiratory suppression (desaturation or bradypnea) were documented when the patients were discharged from PACU. Fentanyl doses were converted to equivalent morphine doses (fentanyl 100 mcg is equal to morphine 10 mg) to calculate the total amount of opioids used intraoperatively and in the PACU.
Our primary outcome was total requirement of opioids in the PACU, and the secondary outcomes were duration of PACU stay and the adverse effects of remifentanil that influence the recovery, as stated above. The preliminary data of 15 patients, who underwent head and neck surgery for more than 2 h and those who received only fentanyl/morphine intraoperatively, demonstrated a mean (SD) morphine requirement in PACU of 0.0334 (0.067) mg.kg−1. To detect 35% difference in opioid consumption among remifentanil and fentanyl/morphine (control) group with a power of 90% at 0.05 level of significance, estimated sample size was 109 patients per group. The 35% difference in opioid use was chosen arbitrarily based on our clinical experience. SPSS statistical software version 21 was used to analyze the data (SPSS Inc., Chicago, IL), and P < 0.05 was considered significant. Univariate analysis was performed using Chi-square test or Fisher's exact test for categorical variables and the independent sample t-test or one-way analysis of variance for continuous variables. Multiple linear regression analysis was performed to assess the effect of intraoperative remifentanil on postoperative opioid requirement in PACU after taking into account the age, nature of the surgery, usage of volatile agents, and the duration of surgery. Preliminary analyses were conducted to ensure that there was no violation of the assumptions of normality, linearity, multicollinearity, and homoscedasticity.
| Results|| |
Both groups were comparable for age, gender, weight, and ASA status. However, there was statistically significant difference in the distribution of surgical specialties between the two groups (P < 0.001). To assess the effect of invasiveness of the surgery, we stratified the surgeries into superficial and deep surgeries. Surgeries only involving the skin, soft tissues, thyroid, and salivary glands were categorized as superficial and those involving muscles and bone were grouped under deep surgeries. Remifentanil was deep surgeries, while morphine/fentanyl were used more often for superficial surgeries intraoperatively (P = 0.006). Post-hoc subgroup analysis of the duration of surgeries in three groups showed that remifentanil was preferentially used for surgeries lasting more than 6 h (P = 0.007). The intraoperative remifentanil infusion range was between 0.0086 and 0.2144 mcg.kg−1.min−1 with the mean (SD) infusion rate of 0.081 (0.048) mcg.kg−1.min−1. A higher dosage of intraoperative opioid in morphine equivalent was observed in morphine/fentanyl group compared to remifentanil group [Table 1].
We found significantly higher pain scores (NRS) at 15, 30, and 45 min since PACU admission in remifentanil group [Table 2]. Furthermore, a significantly higher incidence and dosage of PACU opioid usage and a longer duration of PACU stay were noticed in the remifentanil group [Table 3].
A post-hoc subgroup analysis in surgical specialties showed that significantly higher doses of opioid were used in the PACU in remifentanil group only in general and plastic surgical procedures, but the opioid usage in PACU was comparable for ENT and dental surgical procedures [Table 4].
|Table 4: PACU opioid dose in morphine equivalent (mcg.kg-1) in different specialties|
Click here to view
Multiple regression analysis showed that only intraoperative use of remifentanil infusion was significantly associated with higher doses of opioid usage in the PACU. Invasiveness and subspecialty of surgery, doses of long-acting opioids used intraoperatively, duration of surgery, or the type of volatile anesthetic agent used were not associated with more opioid consumption in the postoperative period [Table 5]. There was no significant difference in other adverse events occur in the PACU due to intraoperative opioid use [Table 6].
| Discussion|| |
Based on our limited observation the intraoperative use of remifentanil infusion in head and neck surgery lasting at least 2 h is associated with significantly higher pain scores and opioid requirement in the PACU. Furthermore, we found that intraoperative remifentanil use also increases the duration of stay in PACU, and is an independent predictor for high doses of opioid use.
The main strength of our study was using PACU opioid dose which is a well-defined objective primary outcome. Most studies investigating the effect of remifentanil infusion on the development of opioid-induced hyperalgesia have used postoperative pain score as the primary outcome. However, pain score is a subjective outcome and identifying a clinically significant difference is often challenging. As per our knowledge, the percentage of the additional opioid requirement to demonstrate the development of remifentanil induced hyperalgesia (RIH) has never been reported. We believe 35% difference in PACU opioid dose would be able to demonstrate the RIH.
A systematic review on remifentanil for general anesthesia by Komatsu et al. demonstrated that patients receiving remifentanil required additional postoperative analgesics at a 40% more frequency than those administered morphine or fentanyl. However, we found that the requirement of postoperative analgesics in remifentanil group was almost 100% more than conventional opioids such as morphine or fentanyl (frequency of 51 vs 25 patients). Komatsu et al. also demonstrated that the difference in the additional analgesic requirement is smaller in patients with a high postoperative analgesic requirement such as major abdominal and pelvic surgeries and larger in patients with low post analgesic requirement such as head and neck surgeries, mastectomies, or arthroscopies. All our participants had a low expectation of postoperative analgesic requirement, which was confirmed by the lesser intraoperative requirement of analgesics in the fentanyl/morphine group. Overall, our observation of more analgesic requirement to remifentanil use is consistent with previous systemic review.
On the other hand, it is obvious that expected postoperative pain and analgesic requirement may vary depending on the invasiveness of surgery. For example, patients who had a radical neck dissection or mandibular osteotomy are expected to have higher pain scores than those who underwent thyroidectomy. To address this question, we classified the invasiveness of the surgeries into superficial and deep surgeries. However, our multiple regression analysis did not identify invasiveness of surgery as a risk factor for the higher opioid requirement in PACU.
We found that the time to discharge from PACU was significantly longer in the remifentanil group (88.6 Vs 73.1, mean time in min). Even though our study was not powered to PACU discharge time, this finding appears self-explanatory. A similar finding was demonstrated in children undergoing adeno-tonsillectomies in the ambulatory surgical unit in which remifentanil use was associated with earlier extubation time, however greater pain in remifentanil group caused delay in PACU and hospital discharge in remifentanil group.
Our finding of a statistically significant difference in pain scores only during the first 45 min since PACU admission is self-explanatory. This is due to aggressive pain control in PACU using intravenous opioids with the target of NRS below 3, as per our departmental PACU discharge criteria.
The mechanism for intraoperative remifentanil usage causing higher requirements of postoperative analgesics is not clearly identified. Possible postulations made to explain this effect includes development of acute opioid tolerance (AOT) or the opioid-induced hyperalgesia (OIH) caused by remifentanil. OIH is defined as a state of nociceptive sensitisation characterized by a paradoxical response, whereby a patient receiving opioids for treating pain might have an increased sensitivity to painful stimuli., Meanwhile, the AOT is defined as an increase in the dose required maintaining adequate analgesia in patients receiving opioid medication for the treatment of pain in clinical settings., However, OIH is often confused with AOT because of the manifestations of similar symptoms.
The interest in OIH was triggered by a few animal studies even before the invention of remifentanil. Studies on rodents since the early 1970s suggested that administration of opioids paradoxically may increase the sensitivity to pain and potentially may aggravate pre-existing pain., OIH and AOT secondary to remifentanil infusion are mainly influenced by the dose and duration of infusion. A study among volunteers demonstrated that hyperalgesia and allodynia to frey hair stimulations adjacent to the surgical wound were significantly greater with a higher dose of remifentanil infusion at 0.4 mcg.kg−1.min−1 compared to a low dose infusion at 0.05 mcg.kg−1.min−1. Another study measured the analgesic effect of remifentanil infusion by cold and mechanical noxious stimulation in healthy volunteers, and showed the analgesic effects reached its maximum at 60–90 min. Subsequently, the analgesic effect began to decline despite the continuous remifentanil infusion, and after 3 hours it was only 25% of its peak value. Our finding of higher PACU opioid requirement with intermediate dose of intraoperative remifentanil use (0.08 mcg.kg−1.min−1) strengthens the conclusions of above volunteer studies.
However, studies done in various surgical procedures disprove the above observation of AOT and OIH., Patients in these studies received remifentanil with either nitrous oxide or propofol infusion, and the negative result of this studies can be explained by the inhibitory effect of nitrous oxide and propofol on the development of AOT/OIH., Nitrous oxide is an NMDA antagonist, and reduces the development of OIH in rats in a dose-dependent manner. Recently Echevarria et al. demonstrated that the intraoperative administration of 70% nitrous oxide significantly reduced the postoperative OIH in patients receiving remifentanil (0.3 mcg.kg−1.min−1) anesthesia for septorhinoplasty. However, nitrous oxide is not widely used in clinical practice due to adverse effects.
In terms of adverse effects of remifentanil in the PACU, postoperative nausea and vomiting (PONV) was not significantly different in the two groups and was similar to the findings of the previous studies. Furthermore, the difference in the incidence of PONV is almost 50%. We attribute this higher difference to greater doses of opioid requirement in the PACU for remifentanil group. We also noticed that the remifentanil group had a similar incidence of drowsiness , chest tightness and shivering in the PACU as the conventional opioid group.
Our study has following limitations. First, this was a prospective observational study and the patients were not randomized or matched. This would have potentially introduced an unequal distribution of known and unknown confounders between the groups compared. We chose an observational study design since the use of intraoperative remifentanil infusion widely varies among the anesthesiologists according to their personal preference, type, and invasiveness of the surgery. We believed observational study design would be pragmatic and recruiting 222 patients for a randomized control design would be challenging in our setting. The staff anaesthesiologist was not blinded and allowed to decide the group according to his/her preference. However, PACU nursing staff who collected the recovery profile data were blinded to the intraoperative opioids used. Second, we could not control the amount of intraoperative morphine or fentanyl administered, as well as the distribution of the specialties and invasiveness of surgeries. These factors significantly differ between cases and control and could influence the study results. However, this could depict the real-life practice, and furthermore, a multiple regression analysis showed that only the use of remifentanil influences the opioid consumption in the PACU. Third, we collected data only during the PACU stay and did not assess the pain scores and analgesic requirements after discharge from a PACU. In our experience, head and neck surgeries are expected to be less painful postoperatively, and we do not routinely prescribe opioid analgesia for these patients after discharge from PACU. Furthermore, we did not collect data on the time of stoppage of remifentanil infusion. Remifentanil-related side-effects such as drowsiness and tightness of the chest could have been missed in the PACU due to its ultra-short action if the infusion was stopped earlier than the end of the surgery. Finally, our data were skewed due to lower incidence of PACU opioid requirement. However, we found that the skew was present in both groups and when the data was presented in median and interquartile ranges (IQR) observed similar findings when we analyzed with nonparametric test.
| Conclusion|| |
In conclusion, at clinically relevant doses, intraoperative remifentanil infusion appears to increase the opioid consumption in the immediate postoperative period, and thereby delays the discharge from PACU in patients undergoing elective head and neck procedures of more than 2 h duration. However, observational study design and our findings of differences in the amount of intraoperative long-acting opioid usage and invasiveness of surgeries hinder us from making such conclusion. A randomized control trial with adequate sample size and appropriate methodology considering the effect of intraoperative opioid dose should be conducted to confirm our observations.
We thank our anesthetic colleagues at the Department of Anesthesia, Singapore General Hospital and PACU nursing staff for their help in this study.
Financial support and sponsorship
Conflicts of interest
There are no conflicts of interest.
| References|| |
Thompson JP, Rowbotham DJ. Remifentanil—An opioid for 21st
century. Br J Anaesth 1996;76:341-3.
Kaygusuz K, Yildirim A, Kol IO, Gursoy S, Mimaroglu C. Hypotensive anaesthesia with remifentanil combined with desflurane or isoflurane in tympanoplasty or endoscopic sinus surgery: A randomised, controlled trial. J Laryngol Otol 2008;122:691-5.
Manola M, De Luca E, Moscillo L, Mastella A. Using remifentanil and sufentanil in functional endoscopic sinus surgery to improve surgical conditions. ORL J Otorhinolaryngol Relat Spec 2005;67:83-6.
Guignard, B Bossard AE, Coste C, Sessler DI, Lebrault C, Alfonsi P, et al
. Acute opioid tolerance: Intraoperative remifentanil increases postoperative pain and morphine requirement. Anesthesiology 2000;93:409-17.
Joly V, Richebe P, Guignard B, Fletcher D, Maurette P, Sessler DI, et al
. Remifentanil-induced postoperative hyperalgesia and its prevention with small-dose ketamine. Anesthesiology 2005;103:147-55.
Lee M, Silverman S, Hansen H, Patel VB, Manchikanti L. A comprehensive review of opioid-induced hyperalgesia. Pain Physician 2011;14:145-61.
Yeom, JH, Kim KH, Chon MS, Byun J, Cho SY. Remifentanil used as adjuvant in general anesthesia for spinal fusion does not exhibit acute opioid tolerance. Korean J Anesthesiol 2012;63:103-7.
Lee LH, Irwin MG, Lui SK. Intraoperative remifentanil infusion does not increase postoperative opioid consumption compared with 70% nitrous oxide. Anesthesiology 2005;102:398-402.
Komatsu R, Turan AM, Orhan-Sungur M, McGuire J, Radke OC, Apfel CC. Remifentanil for general anaesthesia: A systematic review. Anaesthesia 2007;62:1266-80.
Von Elm E, Altman DG, Egger M, Pocock SJ, Gøtzsche PC, Vandenbroucke JP. for the STROBE Initiative. The Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (STROBE) statement: Guidelines for reporting observational studies. Bull World Health Organ 2007;85:867-72.
Knotkova H1, Fine PG, Portenoy RK. Opioid rotation: The science and the limitations of the equianalgesic dose table. J Pain Symptom Manage 2009;38:426-39.
Davis PJ1, Finkel JC, Orr RJ, Fazi L, Mulroy JJ, Woelfel SK, et al
. A randomized, double-blinded study of remifentanil versus fentanyl for tonsillectomy and adenoidectomy surgery in pediatric ambulatory surgical patients. Anesth Analg 2000;90:863-71.
Angst, MS, Koppert W, Pahl I, Clark DJ, Schmelz M. Short-term infusion of the mu-opioid agonist remifentanil in humans causes hyperalgesia during withdrawal. Pain 2003;106:49-57.
Angst MS, Clark JD. Opioid-induced hyperalgesia: A qualitative systematic review. Anesthesiology 2006;104:570-87.
Chu LF, Angst MS, Clark D. Opioid-induced hyperalgesia in humans: Molecular mechanisms and clinical considerations. Clin J Pain 2008;24:479-96.
Tilson HA, Rech RH, Stolman S. Hyperalgesia during withdrawal as a means of measuring the degree of dependence in morphine dependent rats. Psychopharmacologia 1973;28:287-300.
Aley KO, Levine JD. Different mechanisms mediate development and expression of tolerance and dependence for peripheral mu-opioid antinociception in rat. J Neurosci 1997;17:8018-23.
Koppert W, Angst M, Alsheimer M, Sittl R, Albrecht S, Schüttler J, et al
. Naloxone provokes similar pain facilitation as observed after short-term infusion of remifentanil in humans. Pain 2003;106:91-9.
Vinik HR, Kissin I. Rapid development of tolerance to analgesia during remifentanil infusion in humans. Anesth Analg 1998;86:1307-11.
Gustorff B, Nahlik G, Hoerauf KH, Kress HG. The absence of acute tolerance during remifentanil infusion in volunteers. Anesth Analg 2002;94:1223-8.
Shin SW, Cho AR, Lee HJ, Kim HJ, Byeon GJ, Yoon JW, et al
. Maintenance anaesthetics during remifentanil-based anaesthesia might affect postoperative pain control after breast cancer surgery. Br J Anaesth 2010;105:661-7.
Bandschapp O, Filitz J, Ihmsen H, Berset A, Urwyler A, Koppert W, et al
. Analgesic and anti-hyperalgesia properties of propofol in a human pain model. Anesthesiology 2010;113:421-8.
Singler B, Troster A, Manering N, Schüttler J, Koppert W. Modulation of remifentanil-induced postinfusion hyperalgesia by propofol. Anesth Analg 2007;104:1397-403.
Jevtovic-Todorovic V, Todorovic SM, Mennerick S, Powell S, Dikranian K, Benshoff N, et al
. Nitrous oxide (laughing gas) is an NMDA antagonist, neuroprotectant and neurotoxin. Nat Med 1998;4:460-3.
Richebe P, Rivat C, Creton C, Laulin JP, Maurette P, Lemaire M, et al
. Nitrous oxide revisited: Evidence for potent antihyperalgesic properties. Anesthesiology 2005;103:845-54.
Echevarria G, Elgueta F, Fierro C, Bugedo D, Faba G, Iñiguez-Cuadra R, et al
. Nitrous oxide (N2
O) reduces postoperative opioid-induced hyperalgesia after remifentanil-propofol anaesthesia in humans. Br J Anaesth 2011;107:959-65.
Apfel CC, Korttila K, Abdalla M, Kerger H, Turan A, Vedder I, et al
. A factorial trial of six interventions for the prevention of postoperative nausea and vomiting. N Engl J Med 2004;350:2441-51.
[Table 1], [Table 2], [Table 3], [Table 4], [Table 5], [Table 6]