Users Online: 263 Home Print this page Email this page Small font sizeDefault font sizeIncrease font size  
Home | About us | Editorial board | Search | Ahead of print | Current issue | Archives | Submit article | Instructions | Subscribe | Contacts | Login 

    Article Cited by others


PLMA vs. I-gel: A comparative evaluation of respiratory mechanics in laparoscopic cholecystectomy

Sharma Bimla, Sehgal Raminder, Sahai Chand, Sood Jayashree

Year : 2010| Volume: 26| Issue : 4 | Page no: 451-457

   This article has been cited by
1 I-gel for positive pressure ventilation
Maharjan, S.K.
Journal of the Nepal Medical Association. 2013; 52(5): 255-259
[Pubmed]  [Google Scholar]
2 Comparison of laryngeal mask airway supreme and laryngeal mask airway proseal with respect to oropharyngeal leak pressure during laparoscopic cholecystectomy: A randomised controlled trial
Beleña, J.M. and Núñez, M. and Anta, D. and Carnero, M. and Gracia, J.L. and Ayala, J.L. and Alvarez, R. and Yuste, J.
European Journal of Anaesthesiology. 2013; 30(3): 119-123
[Pubmed]  [Google Scholar]
3 A comparison of the single-use i-gel with the reusable laryngeal mask airway proseal in anesthetized adult patients in Japanese population
Hayashi, K. and Suzuki, A. and Kunisawa, T. and Takahata, O. and Yamasawa, Y. and Iwasaki, H.
Japanese Journal of Anesthesiology. 2013; 62(2): 134-139
[Pubmed]  [Google Scholar]
4 A 30 year development of the laryngeal mask. Supraglottic devices without balloon [A 30 años del desarrollo de la máscara laríngea. Dispositivos supraglóticos sin globo]
Carrillo-Esper, R. and Carrillo-Córdova, C.A. and Carrillo-Córdova, D.M. and Carrillo-Córdova, L.D.
Revista Mexicana de Anestesiologia. 2011; 34(4): 313-315
[Pubmed]  [Google Scholar]


Read this article