Users Online: 6351 Home Print this page Email this page Small font sizeDefault font sizeIncrease font size  
Home | About us | Editorial board | Search | Ahead of print | Current issue | Archives | Submit article | Instructions | Subscribe | Contacts | Login 


RSACP wishes to inform that it shall be discontinuing the dispatch of print copy of JOACP to it's Life members. The print copy of JOACP will be posted only to those life members who send us a written confirmation for continuation of print copy.
Kindly email your affirmation for print copies to dranjugrewal@gmail.com preferably by 30th June 2019.

 

 
ORIGINAL ARTICLE
Ahead of print publication  

Development of a preoperative Early Warning Scoring System to identify highly suspect COVID-19 patients


1 Department of Anesthesiology and Critical Care, Sheri Kashmir Institute of Medical Sciences, Soura, Srinagar, India
2 Professor of Anaesthesiology, Dharwad Institute of Mental Health and Neurosciences, Dharwad, Karnataka, India
3 ESI-PGIMSR, Rajajinagar, Karnataka, India
4 Department of Onco-Anaesthesia, Pain and Palliative Medicine, Dr BRA IRCH, AIIMS, Ansari Nagar, New Delhi, India
5 Professor of Anaesthesiology, BMCRI, Bangalore, Karnataka, India
6 Professor of Anaesthesiology, Dr BR Ambedkar Medical College and Hospital, Bangalore, Karnataka, India
7 Professor of Anaesthesiology, Department of Anaesthesiology, Vijayanagar Institute of Medical Sciences, Ballari, Karnataka, India

Date of Submission20-May-2020
Date of Acceptance14-Jun-2020
Date of Web Publication27-Jul-2020

Correspondence Address:
S Bala Bhaskar,
Department of Anaesthesiology, Vijayanagar Institute of Medical Sciences, Ballari, Karnataka
India
Login to access the Email id

Source of Support: None, Conflict of Interest: None

DOI: 10.4103/joacp.JOACP_274_20

  Abstract 


Background and Aims: The coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) is spreading at an unprecedented speed. Lack of resources to test every patient scheduled for surgery and false negative test results contribute to considerable stress to anesthesiologists, along with health risks to both caregivers and other patients. The study aimed to develop an early warning screening tool to rapidly detect 'highly suspect' among the patients scheduled for surgery.
Methods: Review of literature was conducted using terms 'coronavirus' OR 'nCoV 2019' OR 'SARS-CoV-2' OR 'COVID-19' AND 'clinical characteristics' in PUBMED and MedRxiv. Suitable articles were analysed for symptoms and investigations commonly found in COVID-19 patients. Additionally, COVID-19 patient's symptomatology and investigation profiles were obtained through a survey from 20 COVID-19 facilities in India. Based on literature evidence and the survey information, an Early Warning Scoring System was developed.
Results: Literature search yielded 3737 publications, of which 195 were considered relevant. Of these 195 studies, those already included in the meta-analyses were not considered for independent assessment. Based on the combined data from meta-analyses and survey, risk factors of COVID-19 disease identified were as follows: history of exposure, fever, cough, myalgias, lymphocytopaenia, elevated C-reactive protein (CRP)/lactate dehydrogenase (LDH) and radiographic infiltrates.
Conclusion: Development of this Early Warning Scoring System for preoperative screening of patients may help in identifying 'highly suspect' COVID-19 patients, alerting the physician and other healthcare workers on the need for adequate personal protection and also to implement necessary measures to prevent cross infection and contamination during the perioperative period.

Keywords: Coronavirus, cough, COVID-19, humans, India, myalgia, prevalence, risk factors



How to cite this URL:
Ali Z, Goneppanavar U, Dongare PA, Garg R, Kannan S, Harsoor S S, Bhaskar S B. Development of a preoperative Early Warning Scoring System to identify highly suspect COVID-19 patients. J Anaesthesiol Clin Pharmacol [Epub ahead of print] [cited 2020 Aug 10]. Available from: http://www.joacp.org/preprintarticle.asp?id=290916




  Introduction Top


The coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) caused by the Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome novel Corona Virus 2 (SARS-nCoV-2) is spreading across the world at an unprecedented speed. The disease is increasingly reported in India based mainly on active surveillance and self-reporting whereas countries such as Italy, United Kingdom (UK) and United States of America (USA) are in the community transmission phase of the disease. The disease is contagious, spreads through droplets, airborne transmission and fomites. The virus can survive on a variety of surfaces for prolonged durations. Human-to-human transmission occurs not only in close personal contacts but also among the larger community.

Many asymptomatic COVID-19 patients and those with mild symptoms may potentially spread the disease.[1] Therefore, unless everyone scheduled for surgery is tested for COVID-19 disease, the risk of inadvertent transfer of infection to healthcare workers (HCW), patients and their attenders remains high. Currently, the diagnosis is dependent on quantitative Reverse-Transcriptase Polymerase Chain Reaction (RT-PCR) of respiratory secretions to detect the SARS-nCoV-2 nucleic acid.[2] The Indian Council of Medical Research (ICMR) for COVID-19 advocates testing of all symptomatic individuals and asymptomatic direct and high-risk contacts of a confirmed case between day 5 and day 10 of coming into contact.[3] Though the MOHFW has put in case definitions for suspect, probable and confirmed cases [4] however, at the time of submission of this manuscript, ICMR does not recommend routine preoperative COVID-19 testing in all patients scheduled for surgery. The results of RT-PCR are influenced by faulty collection techniques, a low viral load in the window period and low sensitivity of RT-PCR (59–71%).[5] The time lag between sample collection and obtaining the results (minimum 2–4 h) limits the use of routine preoperative COVID-19 testing in patients scheduled for emergent procedures. Insufficient test kits make it difficult to screen all the patients. However, operating an undetected COVID-19 patient risks HCWs contracting the disease, subsequent loss of manpower and closure of the healthcare facility. Pooled sampling by RT-PCR may help to identify such patients in the preoperative period.

Though Chest Computed Tomography (CCT) is more sensitive than RT-PCR, it may generate false positives in cases of non-COVID-19 pneumonia.[6] Moreover, routine CCT is economically not feasible and risky as this involves movement of the suspected patient across several corridors to the radiology suite. Treating every patient as possible COVID-19 is also not economically feasible. A high index of suspicion based on history, clinical evaluation and available investigations appears to be the only way to minimise transmission from undetected COVID-19 patients.

The aim was to develop a multi-parametric screening tool for rapid preoperative identification of 'highly suspect' COVID-19 patients. In view of recent ICMR guidelines, this screening tool is also expected to contribute to better triaging of such patients and help in rational use of Personal Protective Equipment (PPE).


  Methods Top


Ten countries (Belgium, China, France, Germany, Iran, Italy, Spain, Turkey, UK, USA) with high prevalence of COVID-19 were identified using the data from 'covidworldometers'.[7] A search (until 26th April 2020) was made in PubMed and MedRxiv, to identify studies reporting COVID-19 characteristics from these countries with the focus on clinical symptoms, signs, laboratory and imaging results.

The following terms 'Coronavirus' or 'nCoV 2019' or 'SARS-CoV-2' or 'COVID-19' and 'Clinical Characteristics' were used for the literature search. From the manuscripts accessed, those related to (a) epidemiological aspects of the disease (b) presenting features (c) laboratory and radiographic findings and (d) the presence of any underlying chronic health conditions were included for data extraction and analysis. The studies considered for the development of this EWSS included meta-analyses, systematic reviews, observational studies and case series. The narrative reviews, case reports and editorials were excluded. To maintain heterogeneity of the clinical spectrum and reduce the regional bias, an attempt was made to include the characteristic presenting features from studies covering all the global regions. Due to lack of published data from India, a survey was conducted to collect such information about the Indian COVID-19 patients from the physicians working at 20 COVID-19 facilities in India.

The development of Early Warning Scoring System (EWSS) was based on the analysis of the collected evidence from literature and survey findings. A plan was made to study the epidemiological characteristics, clinical features and investigations of patients with COVID-19 disease. It was decided that the presence of these characteristics with a higher prevalence in multiple studies will be given higher scores, and those with lower prevalence in fewer studies will be given lower scores.

As part of the methodology, the data from meta-analyses from China and systematic reviews, case series published from non-Chinese COVID-19 patients were analysed. The symptoms and the investigations so analysed, were subcategorised into major and minor criteria, based on the prevalence rates reported in the meta-analyses and survey findings. It was planned that a maximum score of 5 will be assigned to each of the main clinical characteristics of COVID-19 disease in the EWSS. Domestic travel to areas of high COVID-19 prevalence within India and HCW attending to COVID-19 patients/suspects would be assigned 5 points if such exposure history was present within past 14 days. Secondary contacts and COVID-19 RT-PCR tested negative patients would be assigned 3 points if such history was obtained within 14 days.

If a symptom or an investigation was reported by 2 meta-analyses with a prevalence of >40%, it was considered a major criterion (2 points for each major criterion). When the reported prevalence was less than this, it was considered a minor criterion (1 point for each minor criterion). The survey data complimented the major criteria if the symptom or investigation was reported by more than 10 centres with prevalence from 25% to 100%. Based on the data from meta-analyses and survey findings, 5 points were assigned for the presence of strongly suggestive features on imaging [chest radiograph (CXR) or CCT] since the reported prevalence was >40% from at least 2 meta-analyses. A ceiling on the score to a maximum of 5 was put to each essential characteristics for the purpose of preparing this scoring system.

Since male gender,[8],[9],[10],[11],[12] age >60 years,[12] and presence of co-morbidities [13],[14],[15],[16] (hypertension, diabetes mellitus, ischaemic heart disease, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, bronchial asthma, heart failure, obesity, hypercholesterolemia, and malignancy) have been found to increase susceptibility for acquiring COVID-19, 1 point was assigned for the presence of each of these associated risk factors subject to a maximum score of 2. A lesser score was assigned as these factors increased the predisposition but were not essential characteristics.

The scoring was designed with the understanding that higher the number of essential characteristics, larger the suspicion for COVID-19. Therefore, a score of up to 10 signifies the presence of one or two essential characteristics, hence, low suspicion. A score of 11–15 signifies the presence of at least three essential characteristics or two essential characteristics along with associated risk factors, hence, high suspicion. A score of 16 or greater signifies the presence of all 4 essential characteristics or at least 3 essential characteristics along with associated risk factors, hence, very high suspicion.


  Results Top


Literature search yielded 3737 publications, of which 195 studies were considered relevant. Of these 195 studies, those included in the meta-analyses were not considered for independent assessment. Most of the systematic reviews and meta-analyses were from China or included studies [Table 1] and [Table 2] related to Chinese population.[8],[9],[10],[11],[12],[13] Limited data were available from non-Chinese population [Table 3].[14],[15],[16],[17],[18],[19],[20] There was only one study from India as on 20th May 2020.[21]
Table 1: Symptomatology of COVID-19 disease

Click here to view
Table 2: Laboratory Investigations and Imaging Findings of COVID-19 patients

Click here to view
Table 3: Symptomatology, Laboratory Investigations and Imaging Findings of COVID-19 patients from non-Chinese populations

Click here to view


These revealed that the COVID-19 manifestations involve four essential characteristics (a) history of exposure to a known COVID-19 source, (b) clinical spectrum of symptoms and signs (c) derangement in investigations and (d) chest infiltrates on imaging in moderate to severe disease. The evidence from these meta-analyses [8],[9],[10],[11],[12] and the survey findings suggests that all four characteristics have a high correlation index for the development of the disease. Hence, a maximum score of 5 was assigned to each of these characteristics in the EWSS.

The data from Chinese population [Table 1] revealed the following: Two meta-analyses found that 5.6–11.9% of the patients were asymptomatic at the time of testing.[10],[13] Fever, cough and myalgia were the most common manifestations in mild to moderate disease.[9],[10],[11],[12],[13] Dyspnea [11],[12] was the only symptom associated with both severe disease [pooled odd ratio (pOR) 3.70, 95%; Confidence Interval (CI) 1.83 –7.46] and ICU admission (pOR 6.55, 95% CI 4.28– 10.0).[22] Less common manifestations included expectoration, fatigue, diarrhoea, headache, hemoptysis, sore throat, anorexia, chest tightness/chest pain, dizziness, rhinorrhoea, nausea, vomiting, nasal congestion, pharyngalgia, shivering/chills and abdominal pain.[9],[10],[11],[12],[13]

Studies from non-Chinese origin showed that fever, cough, fatigue, dyspnoea/shortness of breath were the major clinical manifestations.[14],[15],[16],[17],[18],[19],[20] Presence of pharyngodynia (12.4%), nasal congestion (3.7%) and rhinorrhoea (4%) in confirmed COVID-19 patients was found in one systematic review published from.[17] A total of nine patients (five of Chinese origin) from Bolivia [19] who had travelled to France presented with predominant symptoms of cough and fever. Of the 28 hospitalised COVID-19 patients, prevalence of cough and sore throat was 28.6% each, fever, myalgia, headache (25% each).[18] Diarrhoea was an infrequent symptom (10.7%).[18] In a study from New York, the commonest presenting symptoms of COVID-19 patients were found to be cough (79.4%), fever (77.1%), dyspnoea (56.5%), myalgia (23.8%), diarrhoea (23.7%), nausea and vomiting (19.1).[14] A case series from Seattle reported shortness of breath with cough (88%) followed by fever as main clinical presentations.[15] Based on anecdotal evidence gathered from around the world Ministry of Health and Family Welfare, Government of India and American academy of otolaryngology-head and neck surgery proposed anosmia, dysgeusia and ageusia to be added to the list of screening tools for COVID-19 infection.[4],[17],[23]

The information from the Survey conducted in India obtained from the participating physicians working in 20 COVID-19 facilities (1 primary, 7 secondary, 12 tertiary), with a cumulative experience of managing 2716 COVID-19 patients revealed the following: predominantly observed clinical symptoms (>25% patients at a COVID-19 facility) were fever (14 facilities), cough (16 facilities), myalgia (11 facility) and dyspnoea (6 facilities). Other manifestations were expectoration, dyspnoea, chills/shivering, chest pain/chest tightness, hemoptysis, nasal congestion/rhinorrhoea, sore throat, headache/dizziness, diarrhoea, nausea/vomiting, abdominal pain, anorexia and pharyngalgia. Eleven out of 20 facilities noted dyspnoea in only severe diseases. Of 2716 COVID-19 patients, 158 were admitted to ICU and 45 underwent surgery. Many contacts of these COVID-19 positive patients were completely asymptomatic and did not realise they were infected with SARS-nCoV-2.

The data of laboratory investigations [Table 2] involving Chinese population from six meta-analyses [7],[8],[9],[10],[11],[12] showed lymphocytopenia (43.1–64.5%), elevated Erythrocyte Sedimentation Rate [(ESR), 41.8–65.6%] and deranged acute phase reactants in COVID-19 disease CRP (44.3–73.6%) and LDH (28.3–57.0%). Lymphocytosis, leucocytosis/leukocytopenia, neutrophilia/neutropenia, thrombocytopenia, elevated D-dimer levels, increased serum bilirubin/alanine transferase/aspartate transferase, increased serum creatinine, elevated procalcitonin, high troponin I and elevated serum ferritin were reported less frequently.[8],[9],[10],[11],[12],[13] A systematic review of 27 studies comprising of 656 patients reported decreased albumin levels in 75.8% of COVID-19 positive patients. (95% CI 30.5–100.0%).[12]

Study from USA reported lymphocytopenia in 18 out of 24 patients (75%)[14] and from Korea reported increased CRP in 11/27 (40.7%) patients and increased LDH in 11/26 (42.3) patients.[18]

From the survey conducted in India, the predominant laboratory derangements (>25% patients at a COVID-19 facility) were lymphocytopenia (14 facilities), elevated CRP (10 facilities) and elevated LDH (10 facilities). Other laboratory derangements such as lymphocytosis, leucocytosis/leukocytopenia, neutrophilia/neutropenia, thrombocytopenia, elevated erythrocyte sedimentation rate, elevated D-dimer levels, increased serum bilirubin/alanine transferase/aspartate transferase, hypoalbuminemia, increased serum creatinine, elevated procalcitonin, increased creatinine kinase were reported to have a lower prevalence.

The prevalence of bilateral pneumonia on CXR was 72.9%[12] while CCT showed unilateral or bilateral pneumonia with a prevalence of 72.9–92.6%.[8],[10],[13] The CCT was highly sensitive in diagnosing pneumonia.[5],[6] The common patterns on CCT were ground glass opacity, bilateral patchy shadowing or multiple lobular and subsegmental areas of consolidation.[6] Meta-analyses [Table 2] reported abnormal CCT prevalence ranging from 75.7–96.6% in COVID-19 patients.[8],[10],[13] In studies involving non-Chinese population, a comparable prevalence of bilateral pneumonia ranging from 50 to 75.7% was observed with CCT.[17],[18] Evidence of pneumonia on CCT was observed in most admitted patients (78.6%) though only 27.3% of them required oxygen supplementation and most of them were able to carry out their routine activities ('walking pneumonia').[18] A high incidence of infiltrates (75.3% and 96%, respectively) and ground glass opacities (21%) was observed in patients at admission to ICU.[14],[15] It was observed that nearly all (95.9%) patients with COVID-19 had signs of pneumonia on CCT while only 26.4% patients in the non-COVID-19 group had such abnormalities on CCT.[24] Predominant ground glass opacities mixed with consolidations (with both peripheral and central distributions) on CCT were reported with a C-index of 0.9 in COVID-19 pneumonia.[22] Chest infiltrates were the predominant radiological findings (>25% patients at a COVID-19 facility) in 13 facilities in the survey.

Various meta-analyses [9],[10],[12],[17] and case series [14],[15],[16] have reported a higher prevalence in male gender ranging from 55.9 to 82%. The age at presentation to hospital ranging from 36 to 57 years,[9],[13],[17] with median age at presentation to ICU and non-ICU to be 62.4 and 46.0 years, respectively.[11] Median/mean age of patients admitted to ICU as per the data from Italy, Korea, New York and Seattle was 63,40, 62.2, 64 ± 18 years, respectively.[14],[15],[16],[18] Higher morbidity and oxygen requirement was observed in older patients.[16] Significant number (36.8%) of hospitalised patients had comorbidities.[12] Hypertension,[12],[14],[17] diabetes mellitus,[12],[15],[17] coronary artery disease,[14],[17] chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD),[17] bronchial asthma,[14],[15] chronic kidney disease,[15],[16] chronic liver disease,[16] hypercholesterolaemia,[16] obesity [14] and malignancy [16] were predictive of increased risk and severity of the disease.

Survey results showed that male gender constituted >25% of patients in 17 facilities, age ≥60 years and other comorbidities (HT, diabetes mellitus, ischaemic heart disease, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, bronchial asthma, heart failure, kidney or liver diseases, hypercholesterolaemia, obesity, and malignancy, immunocompromising conditions) were observed in 10 facilities each.


  Discussion Top


Considering the magnitude, virulence and spread of the disease, it was decided to develop a reliable and inexpensive screening tool (EWSS) based on the current evidence.

Exposure to a known COVID-19 source is essential for the development of the disease. The median incubation period is estimated to be 5 days with a range of 2–14 days. Hence, exposure history specifically includes past 14 days in the EWSS.[25] Though WHO [26] and ICMR advocate PCR testing of all primary contacts of a COVID-19 patient, it is possible that domestic travellers to high prevalence areas within India and HCWs in contact with suspect/positive COVID-19 patients can be infected with SARS-nCoV-2. This population has a higher chance of acquiring COVID-19 due to high R0 factor.[27] Hence, such exposure history was assigned 5 points. Secondary contacts and COVID-19 RT-PCR tested negative patients (possible false negative results) may have contracted SARS-nCoV-2 but the relative probability is less. Hence such history was assigned 3 points.

Angiotensin converting enzyme-2 (ACE-2), identified as a functional receptor for SARS-nCoV-2 is expressed in nasal mucosa, bronchus, lung, oesophagus, stomach, intestine, heart, kidney and urinary bladder making these organs vulnerable to SARS-nCoV-2. Primary viral replication occurs in mucosal epithelium of nasal cavity with further multiplication in lower respiratory tract mucosa, giving rise to features of mild viremia (80.9%); manifesting as cough, fever and myalgia.[28] Hence, these were included as major criteria in the EWSS [Table 4]. Mild viremia may also manifest in other ways which are included as minor criteria. Dyspnea and hypoxemia are major manifestation of severe COVID-19 due to development of pneumonia.[11],[12] They are mainly seen in severely sick patients who need admission to intensive care unit.[11],[12] They were excluded from EWSS as primary aim was to identify highly suspect COVID-19 patients who don't present with symptomatic influenza like illness (ILI) or Severe Acute Respiratory Infection (SARI).
Table 4: COVID-19 SCORE Preoperative Early Warning Screening Score for COVID-19 patients scheduled for surgery

Click here to view


The data compiled from Integrated Health Information Platform (IHIP)/Integrated Disease Surveillance Programme (IDSP) portal case investigation forms, from 15,366 COVID-19 patients reported fever (27%) and cough (21%) as the major presenting symptoms.[4]

Reduced lymphocyte count, elevated CRP or LDH [8],[9],[10],[11],[12],[13],[14],[15],[16],[28] were frequently observed in COVID-19 patients and hence were considered major criteria in the EWSS. Non-specific markers [Table 2] may result from either cytokine storm in response to the infection or multi-organ involvement by the virus and hence were considered minor criteria.[8],[9],[10],[11],[12],[13],[14],[15],[16],[28]

SARS-nCoV-2 induced lung injuries manifest on CXR/CCT as fibrous stripes, solid nodules and patchy ground-glass opacities.[5],[6] The findings were a major component of our EWSS as they were observed with high prevalence even in asymptomatic to severe COVID-19 patients.

Among the possible associated risk factors, the preponderance of SARS-nCoV-2 infection among male population is attributed to their relative lack of innate and adaptive immunity as compared to female gender by X-chromosome and sex hormones.[29] Similarly, age ≥60 years [9],[10],[11],[12] and comorbidities [14],[15],[16] have been known to decrease the viral clearance, thus increase the host's susceptibility for contracting the virus.[8]

The information from the survey findings from the questionnaires [Table 5] complemented the evidences in classifying the criteria and assignment of scores for EWSS. In allotting the scores, the prevalence of various features (exposure history, major and minor criteria for symptoms and laboratory investigations, radiological evidence and associated risk factors) reported from the COVID-19 facilities [Table 6] were considered.
Table 5: Survey questionnaire

Click here to view
Table 6: Survey data of common clinical presentation of COVID-19 patients

Click here to view


A multi-parameter screening tool used similar parameters as used in our study but was proposed for outpatient screening for COVID-19.[24] In a previous prediction model, the presence of symptoms, laboratory investigations and characteristic imaging findings correlated with the diagnosis of COVID-19 pneumonia with high predictive performance (C-index 0.81-1).[22] Although the aim of our EWSS was to identify COVID-19 suspects, a similar model aimed to predict the occurrence of critical illness confirmed the presence of increased lactate dehydrogenase, infiltrates on chest imaging and the presence of comorbidities similar to our EWSS.[30]

The advantage of our EWSS over these prediction models [22],[24],[30] is that it involves the evidences from both the Chinese and non-Chinese population. The information obtained by the survey of the attending physicians of COVID-19 facilities in India, strengthens the applicability of EWSS in Indian conditions.

This screening tool can complement the results of RT-PCR, enhancing the overall diagnostic sensitivity for COVID-19. The score is expected to be useful until a rapid, reliable point-of-care laboratory test for COVID-19 becomes available for all patients.

Our study has few limitations. Most of the meta-analyses had significant heterogeneity and too many outcomes were studied without sub-group analysis. One of the meta-anaylses included is in preprint stage (MedRxiv) and may undergo changes after peer review.[11] The scoring system developed from the current literature may need to be revised based on further evidences, in future. Some of the studies were included in more than one metaanalysis. This may have led to duplication of some data. An attempt was made to overcome this limitation by considering the data from the systematic trials and case series from non-Chinese COVID-19 patients for 'development of EWSS'. There is a possibility of community transmission of the COVID-19 disease in future. Hence, the criteria for domestic travel in the scoring system may have to be modified as more evidence emerges. The results from the meta-analysis were analysed mainly for development of EWSS. However, the results of the survey helped to gather information about the clinical characteristic of COVID-19 patients in India, and hence complemented the results from the meta-analysis. However, as the input obtained from our survey was based on the memory recall of the treating physician without precise epidemiological backup at the time of survey it could not be used to devise an EWSS score based on logistic regression analysis. An attempt will be made by the authors to overcome this limitation by a prospective multicentric study in the Indian scenario.

Minor symptoms as dysgeusia and anosmia which may help in early diagnosis were not included in survey questionnaire and may have been missed on reporting by the physicians from the participating COVID-19 facilities.

This is the first of the EWSS, which is proposed in the study and is currently being prospectively validated by a multicentre study (with proper audit from high prevalence COVID-19 facilities in India) and may undergo modifications as new evidences emerge. More details about the clinical characteristics are needed to identify the asymptomatic COVID-19 patients who are presenting for elective or emergency surgical procedures.


  Conclusion Top


A novel easy-to-apply EWSS has been developed based on a combination of exposure risk, symptomatology, laboratory parameters, imaging characteristics and associated risk factors. As a preoperative screening tool, EWSS can help in identifying 'high suspect' COVID-19 patients. This will allow the healthcare workers to take adequate personal protection and also implement necessary measures to prevent cross infection and contamination during the perioperative period.

We acknowledge the following for their contribution in data management:

Dr D V Ramasiva Naik, Dr Edward Johnson J, Dr. Govardhani Yanamadala, Dr. Heena Chhanwal, Dr Javaid Malik, Dr Kiran Chand N, Dr Kiran Kumar Gera, Dr Kiran Mahendru, Dr Manjunath HG, Dr Naheed Azhar, Dr P Mrunalini, Dr Prasanna Bidkar, Dr Prashant Sirhoya, Dr. R. Amutha Rani, Dr Shwethapriya Rao, Dr Syed Suraya Farooq, Dr. Venkatagiri K. M.

Financial support and sponsorship

Nil.

Conflicts of interest

There are no conflicts of interest.



 
  References Top

1.
Rahimi F, Bezmin Abadi ATB. Challenges of managing the asymptomatic carriers of SARS-CoV-2. Travel Med Infect Dis 2020:101677. doi: 10.1016/j.tmaid.2020.101677. [published online ahead of print, 2020 Apr 18].  Back to cited text no. 1
    
2.
Yang P, Wang X. COVID-19: A new challenge for human beings. Cell Mol Immunol 2020:17:555-7.  Back to cited text no. 2
    
3.
Available from: https://www.icmr.gov.in/pdf/covid/strategy/Testing_Strategy_v5_18052020.pdf. [Last accessed on 2020 May 20].  Back to cited text no. 3
    
4.
Available from: https://www.mohfw.gov.in/pdf/ClinicalManagementProtocolforCOVID19.pdf. [Last accessed on 2020 June 13].  Back to cited text no. 4
    
5.
Ai T, Yang Z, Hou H, Zhan C, Chen C, Lv W, et al. Correlation of chest CT and RT-PCR testing in coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) in China: A report of 1014 cases [published online ahead of print, 2020 Feb 26]. Radiology 2020:200642. doi: 10.1148/radiol. 2020200642.  Back to cited text no. 5
    
6.
Huang P, Liu T, Huang L, Liu H, Lei M, Xu W. Use of chest CT in combination with negative RT-PCR assay for the 2019 novel coronavirus but high clinical suspicion. Radiology 2020;295:22-3.  Back to cited text no. 6
    
7.
Available from: https://www.worldometers.info/coronavirus/. [Last accessed on 2020 May 20].  Back to cited text no. 7
    
8.
Sun P, Qie S, Liu Z, Ren J, Li K, Xi J. Clinical characteristics of hospitalized patients with SARS-CoV-2 infection: A single arm meta-analysis. J Med Virol 2020;92:612-7.  Back to cited text no. 8
    
9.
Li LQ, Huang T, Wang YQ, Wang ZP, Liang Y, Huang TB, et al. COVID-19 patients' clinical characteristics, discharge rate, and fatality rate of meta-analysis. J Med Virol 2020;92:577-83.  Back to cited text no. 9
    
10.
Zhu J, Ji P, Pang J, Zhong Z, Li H, He C, et al. Clinical characteristics of 3,062 COVID-19 patients: A meta-analysis [published online ahead of print, 2020 Apr 15]. J Med Virol 2020:10.1002/jmv. 25884. doi: 10.1002/jmv.25884.  Back to cited text no. 10
    
11.
Jain V, Yuan J-M. Systematic review and meta-analysis of predictive symptoms and comorbidities for severe COVID-19 infection. medRxiv 2020. doi: 10.1101/2020.03.15.20035360. [Preprint article, Last accessed on 2020 Jun 17].  Back to cited text no. 11
    
12.
Rodriguez-Morales AJ, Cardona-Ospina JA, Gutiérrez-Ocampo E, Villamizar-Peña R, Holguin-Rivera Y, Escalera-Antezana JP, et al. Clinical, laboratory and imaging features of COVID-19: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Travel Med Infect Dis 2020;34:101623.  Back to cited text no. 12
    
13.
Fu L, Wang B, Yuan T, Chen X, Ao Y, Fitzpatrick T, et al. Clinical characteristics of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) in China: A systematic review and meta-analysis. J Infect 2020;80:656-65.  Back to cited text no. 13
    
14.
Goyal P, Choi JJ, Pinheiro LC, Schenck EJ, Chen R, Jabri A, et al. Clinical characteristics of Covid-19 in New York City. N Engl J Med 2020;382:2372-4.  Back to cited text no. 14
    
15.
Bhatraju PK, Ghassemieh BJ, Nichols M, Kim R, Jerome KR, Nalla AK, et al. Covid-19 in Critically Ill Patients in the Seattle Region-Case Series. N Engl J Med 2020;382:2012-22.  Back to cited text no. 15
    
16.
Grasselli G, Zangrillo A, Zanella A, Antonelli M, Cabrini L, Castelli A, et al. Baseline characteristics and outcomes of 1591 patients infected with SARS-CoV-2 admitted to ICUs of the Lombardy Region, Italy. JAMA 2020;323:1574-81.  Back to cited text no. 16
    
17.
Lovato A, de Filippis C. Clinical Presentation of COVID-19: A Systematic Review Focusing on Upper Airway Symptoms [published online ahead of print, 2020 Apr 13]. Ear Nose Throat J 2020:145561320920762. doi: 10.1177/0145561320920762.  Back to cited text no. 17
    
18.
Kim ES, Chin BS, Kang CK, Kim NJ, Kang YM, Choi JP, et al. Clinical course and outcomes of patients with severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 infection: A preliminary report of the first 28 patients from the Korean Cohort Study on COVID-19. J Korean Med Sci 2020;35:e142.  Back to cited text no. 18
    
19.
Escalera-Antezana JP, Lizon-Ferrufino NF, Maldonado-Alanoca A, Alarcón-De-la-Vega G, Alvarado-Arnez LE, Balderrama-Saavedra MA, et al. Clinical features of the first cases and a cluster of Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19) in Bolivia imported from Italy and Spain [published online ahead of print, 2020 Apr 02]. Travel Med Infect Dis 2020:101653. doi: 10.1016/j.tmaid. 2020.101653.  Back to cited text no. 19
    
20.
Lescure FX, Bouadma L, Nguyen D, Parisey M, Wicky PH, Behillil S, et al. Clinical and virological data of the first cases of COVID-19 in Europe: A case series [published online ahead of print, 2020 Mar 27]. Lancet Infect Dis 2020;20:697-706.  Back to cited text no. 20
    
21.
Gupta N, Agrawal S, Ish P, Mishra S, Gaind R, Usha G, et al. Covid Working Group SH. Clinical and epidemiologic profile of the initial COVID-19 patients at a tertiary care centre in India. Monaldi Arch Chest Dis 2020;90. doi: 10.4081/monaldi.2020.1294.  Back to cited text no. 21
    
22.
Wynants L, Van Calster B, Bonten MMJ, Collins GS, Debray TPA, De Vos M, et al. Prediction models for diagnosis and prognosis of covid-19 infection: Systematic review and critical appraisal. BMJ 2020;369:m1328.  Back to cited text no. 22
    
23.
24.
Song CY, Xu J, He JQ, Lu YQ. COVID-19 early warning score: A multi-parameter screening tool to identify highly suspected patients. medRxiv 2020. doi: 10.1101/2020.03.05.20031906 [preprint].  Back to cited text no. 24
    
25.
Linton NM, Kobayashi T, Yang Y, Hayashi K, Akhmetzhanov AR, Jung SM, et al. Incubation period and other epidemiological characteristics of 2019 novel coronavirus infections with right truncation: A statistical analysis of publicly available case data. J Clin Med 2020;9:538.  Back to cited text no. 25
    
26.
27.
Lai CC, Shih TP, Ko WC, Tang HJ, Hsueh PR. Severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) and coronavirus disease-2019 (COVID-19): The epidemic and the challenges. Int J Antimicrob Agents 2020;55:105924.  Back to cited text no. 27
    
28.
Tay MZ, Poh CM, Rénia L, MacAry PA, Ng LFP. The trinity of COVID-19: immunity, inflammation and intervention. Nat Rev Immunol. 2020;20:363-74.  Back to cited text no. 28
    
29.
Jaillon S, Berthenet K, Garlanda C. Sexual dimorphism in innate immunity. Clin Rev Allergy Immunol 2019;56:308-21.  Back to cited text no. 29
    
30.
Liang W, Liang H, Ou L, Chen B, Chen A, Li C, et al. Development and validation of a clinical risk score to predict the occurrence of critical illness in hospitalized patients with COVID-19. JAMA Intern Med 2020: e202033. doi: 10.1001/jamainternmed. 2020.2033. [published online ahead of print, 2020 May 12].  Back to cited text no. 30
    



 
 
    Tables

  [Table 1], [Table 2], [Table 3], [Table 4], [Table 5], [Table 6]



 

 
Top
 
 
  Search
 
     Search Pubmed for
 
    -  Ali Z
    -  Goneppanavar U
    -  Dongare PA
    -  Garg R
    -  Kannan S
    -  Harsoor S S
    -  Bhaskar S B
    Access Statistics
    Email Alert *
    Add to My List *
* Registration required (free)  

 
  In this article
   Abstract
  Introduction
  Methods
  Results
  Discussion
  Conclusion
   References
   Article Tables

 Article Access Statistics
    Viewed80    
    PDF Downloaded9    

Recommend this journal