<?xml version="1.0"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xmlns:prism="http://prismstandard.org/namespaces/basic/2.0/" xmlns:feedburner="http://rssnamespace.org/feedburner/ext/1.0">
<channel>
<title>Journal of Anaesthesiology Clinical Pharmacology : 2012 - 28(1)</title>
<link>http://www.joacp.org/currentissue.asp</link>
<description>J Anaesthesiol Clin Pharmacol 2012 - 28(1)</description>
<prism:publicationName>Journal of Anaesthesiology Clinical Pharmacology</prism:publicationName> <prism:publisher>Medknow Publications</prism:publisher><prism:issn>0970-9185</prism:issn><atom:link href="http://www.joacp.org/rssfeed.asp" rel="self" type="application/rdf+xml" />

<item>
<title>Nutrition in intensive care</title>
<dc:creator>Ramanathan Ramprasad</dc:creator>
<dc:creator>Mukul Chandra Kapoor</dc:creator>
<dc:type>Editorial</dc:type>
<dc:source>Journal of Anaesthesiology Clinical Pharmacology 2012 28(1):1-3</dc:source><dc:identifier>doi:10.4103/0970-9185.92401</dc:identifier>
<prism:publicationName>Journal of Anaesthesiology Clinical Pharmacology</prism:publicationName> <prism:doi>10.4103/0970-9185.92401</prism:doi> <prism:url>http://www.joacp.org/text.asp?2012/28/1/1/92401</prism:url> <feedburner:origLink>http://www.joacp.org/text.asp?2012/28/1/1/92401</feedburner:origLink><prism:volume>28</prism:volume><prism:number>1</prism:number> <prism:startingPage>1</prism:startingPage> <prism:endingPage>3</prism:endingPage> 
<guid>http://www.joacp.org/text.asp?2012/28/1/1/92401</guid>
<description><![CDATA[<b>Ramanathan Ramprasad, Mukul Chandra Kapoor</b><br><br>Journal of Anaesthesiology Clinical Pharmacology 2012 28(1):1-3<br><br>]]></description>
<pubDate>Tue,31 Jan 2012</pubDate><link>http://www.joacp.org/text.asp?2012/28/1/1/92401</link>
</item>
<item>
<title>Pediatric epidurals</title>
<dc:creator>Navdeep Sethi</dc:creator>
<dc:creator>Ravindra Chaturvedi</dc:creator>
<dc:type>Editorial</dc:type>
<dc:source>Journal of Anaesthesiology Clinical Pharmacology 2012 28(1):4-5</dc:source><dc:identifier>doi:10.4103/0970-9185.92409</dc:identifier>
<prism:publicationName>Journal of Anaesthesiology Clinical Pharmacology</prism:publicationName> <prism:doi>10.4103/0970-9185.92409</prism:doi> <prism:url>http://www.joacp.org/text.asp?2012/28/1/4/92409</prism:url> <feedburner:origLink>http://www.joacp.org/text.asp?2012/28/1/4/92409</feedburner:origLink><prism:volume>28</prism:volume><prism:number>1</prism:number> <prism:startingPage>4</prism:startingPage> <prism:endingPage>5</prism:endingPage> 
<guid>http://www.joacp.org/text.asp?2012/28/1/4/92409</guid>
<description><![CDATA[<b>Navdeep Sethi, Ravindra Chaturvedi</b><br><br>Journal of Anaesthesiology Clinical Pharmacology 2012 28(1):4-5<br><br>]]></description>
<pubDate>Tue,31 Jan 2012</pubDate><link>http://www.joacp.org/text.asp?2012/28/1/4/92409</link>
</item>
<item>
<title>Effect of general anesthetics on the developing brain</title>
<dc:creator>S Velayudha Reddy</dc:creator>
<dc:type>Review Article</dc:type>
<dc:source>Journal of Anaesthesiology Clinical Pharmacology 2012 28(1):6-10</dc:source><dc:identifier>doi:10.4103/0970-9185.92426</dc:identifier>
<prism:publicationName>Journal of Anaesthesiology Clinical Pharmacology</prism:publicationName> <prism:doi>10.4103/0970-9185.92426</prism:doi> <prism:url>http://www.joacp.org/text.asp?2012/28/1/6/92426</prism:url> <feedburner:origLink>http://www.joacp.org/text.asp?2012/28/1/6/92426</feedburner:origLink><prism:volume>28</prism:volume><prism:number>1</prism:number> <prism:startingPage>6</prism:startingPage> <prism:endingPage>10</prism:endingPage> 
<guid>http://www.joacp.org/text.asp?2012/28/1/6/92426</guid>
<description><![CDATA[<b>S Velayudha Reddy</b><br><br>Journal of Anaesthesiology Clinical Pharmacology 2012 28(1):6-10<br><br>Studies on rodents and subhuman primates suggest that prolonged exposure to general anesthetics may induce widespread neuronal cell death and neurological sequelae; seriously questioning the safety of pediatric anesthesia. This review presents recent developments in this rapidly emerging field. There is mounting and convincing preclinical evidence in rodents and nonhuman primates that anesthetics in common clinical use are neurotoxic to the developing brain in vitro and cause long-term neurobehavioral abnormalities in vivo. Prior to the publication of animal data and after the publication of animal data, there are several human cohort studies that demonstrate the association of poor neurodevelopmental outcome in neonates, who underwent major surgery during their neonatal period. This review summarizes our present understanding of some of the key components responsible for anesthesia-induced neuroapoptosis and offers some of neuroprotective strategies that could be beneficial as adjunct therapy in preventing anesthesia-induced death of developing neurons in the neonates. A randomized literature search was carried out using search words apoptosis, general anesthetics, and developing brain from 1979 to 2011 for effects of general anesthetics on developing brain in PUBMED and relevant published literature reviewed. General anesthetics may produce neurotoxicity and enduring cognitive impairment in young and aged animals, but the issue has not been adequately studied in humans. It is premature to recommend a change clinical practice based on the present data.]]></description>
<pubDate>Tue,31 Jan 2012</pubDate><link>http://www.joacp.org/text.asp?2012/28/1/6/92426</link>
</item>
<item>
<title>Perioperative vision loss: A complication to watch out</title>
<dc:creator>VK Grover</dc:creator>
<dc:creator>Kiran Jangra</dc:creator>
<dc:type>Review Article</dc:type>
<dc:source>Journal of Anaesthesiology Clinical Pharmacology 2012 28(1):11-16</dc:source><dc:identifier>doi:10.4103/0970-9185.92427</dc:identifier>
<prism:publicationName>Journal of Anaesthesiology Clinical Pharmacology</prism:publicationName> <prism:doi>10.4103/0970-9185.92427</prism:doi> <prism:url>http://www.joacp.org/text.asp?2012/28/1/11/92427</prism:url> <feedburner:origLink>http://www.joacp.org/text.asp?2012/28/1/11/92427</feedburner:origLink><prism:volume>28</prism:volume><prism:number>1</prism:number> <prism:startingPage>11</prism:startingPage> <prism:endingPage>16</prism:endingPage> 
<guid>http://www.joacp.org/text.asp?2012/28/1/11/92427</guid>
<description><![CDATA[<b>VK Grover, Kiran Jangra</b><br><br>Journal of Anaesthesiology Clinical Pharmacology 2012 28(1):11-16<br><br>Postoperative vision loss, a rare but devastating complication, has been reported after spine, cardiac, and head-neck surgeries. Its incidence following spine surgeries exceeds that after cardiothoracic surgeries. Various causes attributed to postoperative blindness include ischemic optic neuropathy, central or branch retinal artery occlusion, cortical blindness, and rarely external ocular injury. Other contributory factors described are microvascular diseases and intraoperative hemodynamic compromise. However, the exact association of these factors with postoperative blindness has not yet been confirmed. In this review, we describe causes, presentation, and treatment of postoperative blindness and also recommend practical guidelines to avoid this complication. The search strategies for this review included both search of electronic databases as well as manual search of relevant articles.]]></description>
<pubDate>Tue,31 Jan 2012</pubDate><link>http://www.joacp.org/text.asp?2012/28/1/11/92427</link>
</item>
<item>
<title>A comparison of the effectiveness of predictors of caudal block in children-swoosh test, anal sphincter tone, and heart rate response</title>
<dc:creator>Nandini M Dave</dc:creator>
<dc:creator>Madhu Garasia</dc:creator>
<dc:type>Original Article</dc:type>
<dc:source>Journal of Anaesthesiology Clinical Pharmacology 2012 28(1):17-20</dc:source><dc:identifier>doi:10.4103/0970-9185.92428</dc:identifier>
<prism:publicationName>Journal of Anaesthesiology Clinical Pharmacology</prism:publicationName> <prism:doi>10.4103/0970-9185.92428</prism:doi> <prism:url>http://www.joacp.org/text.asp?2012/28/1/17/92428</prism:url> <feedburner:origLink>http://www.joacp.org/text.asp?2012/28/1/17/92428</feedburner:origLink><prism:volume>28</prism:volume><prism:number>1</prism:number> <prism:startingPage>17</prism:startingPage> <prism:endingPage>20</prism:endingPage> 
<guid>http://www.joacp.org/text.asp?2012/28/1/17/92428</guid>
<description><![CDATA[<b>Nandini M Dave, Madhu Garasia</b><br><br>Journal of Anaesthesiology Clinical Pharmacology 2012 28(1):17-20<br><br>Objective: To study the effectiveness of three predictors of successful caudal block in children, viz. swoosh test, heart rate response to injection, and laxity of anal sphincter tone.
 Aim: To improve the success rates of caudal block in children by identifying the best predictor.
 Background: Caudal blocks in children are placed after induction of anesthesia. Although simple to learn and perform, the success rate of the blocks may be variable especially in teaching hospitals where trainee anesthetists perform these blocks.
 Materials and Methods: 223 patients, aged 2-12 years, undergoing lower abdominal and urologic surgery were studied. 0.25&#x0025; Bupivacaine was administered after induction of general anesthesia according to the Armitage regimen.
 Results: The sensitivity and specificity were highest with the sphincter tone test (sensitivity 95.22&#x0025;, specificity 92.86&#x0025;), followed by the heart rate response (sensitivity 92.82&#x0025;, specificity 78.57&#x0025;) and the swoosh test (sensitivity 66.51&#x0025;, specificity 35.71&#x0025;). The anal sphincter tone test had the highest positive predictive value (99.5&#x0025;) and positive likelihood ratio (13.33). The heart rate response had a positive predictive value of 98.48&#x0025; and a positive likelihood ratio of 4.33. The swoosh test, in our study, had a positive predictive value of 93.92&#x0025; and a positive likelihood ratio of 1.035.
Conclusion: The anal sphincter tone test was the best predictor of successful caudal block. We recommend the use of these additional simple predictors of accurate needle placement to increase the success rate of caudal block especially in teaching hospitals.]]></description>
<pubDate>Tue,31 Jan 2012</pubDate><link>http://www.joacp.org/text.asp?2012/28/1/17/92428</link>
</item>
<item>
<title>Advancement of epidural catheter from lumbar to thoracic space in children: Comparison between 18G and 23G catheters</title>
<dc:creator>Dalim Kumar Baidya</dc:creator>
<dc:creator>Dilip Kumar Pawar</dc:creator>
<dc:creator>Maya Dehran</dc:creator>
<dc:creator>Arun Kumar Gupta</dc:creator>
<dc:type>Original Article</dc:type>
<dc:source>Journal of Anaesthesiology Clinical Pharmacology 2012 28(1):21-27</dc:source><dc:identifier>doi:10.4103/0970-9185.92429</dc:identifier>
<prism:publicationName>Journal of Anaesthesiology Clinical Pharmacology</prism:publicationName> <prism:doi>10.4103/0970-9185.92429</prism:doi> <prism:url>http://www.joacp.org/text.asp?2012/28/1/21/92429</prism:url> <feedburner:origLink>http://www.joacp.org/text.asp?2012/28/1/21/92429</feedburner:origLink><prism:volume>28</prism:volume><prism:number>1</prism:number> <prism:startingPage>21</prism:startingPage> <prism:endingPage>27</prism:endingPage> 
<guid>http://www.joacp.org/text.asp?2012/28/1/21/92429</guid>
<description><![CDATA[<b>Dalim Kumar Baidya, Dilip Kumar Pawar, Maya Dehran, Arun Kumar Gupta</b><br><br>Journal of Anaesthesiology Clinical Pharmacology 2012 28(1):21-27<br><br>Backgrounds and Objectives: Lumbar-to-thoracic advancement of epidural catheter is a safe alternative to direct thoracic placement in children. In this prospective randomized study, success rate of advancement of two different types and gauges of catheter from lumbar-to-thoracic space were studied.
 Materials and Methods: Forty ASA I and II children (up to 6 years) undergoing thoracic or upper-abdominal surgery were allocated to either Group I (18G catheter) or Group II (23G catheter). After induction of general anesthesia a pre-determined length of catheter was inserted. Successful catheter placement was defined as the catheter tip within two segment of surgical incision in radio-contrast study. Intra-operative analgesia was provided by epidural bupivacaine and intravenous morphine. Post-operative analgesia was provided with epidural infusion of 0.1&#x0025; bupivacaine&#x002B;1mcg/ml fentanyl.
 Observations and Results: Catheter advancement was successful in 3 cases in Group I and 2 cases in Group II. Five different types of catheter positions were found on X-ray. Negative correlation was found between age and catheter advancement [significance (2-tailed) =0.03]. However, satisfactory post-operative analgesia was obtained in 35 cases. Positive correlation was found between infusion rate, the number of segment of gap between desired level and the level reached [significance (2-tailed) =0.00]. 23G catheter use was associated with more technical complications.
Conclusion: Advancement of epidural catheter from lumbar to thoracic level was successful in only 10-15&#x0025; cases but satisfactory analgesia could be provided by increasing the infusion rates.]]></description>
<pubDate>Tue,31 Jan 2012</pubDate><link>http://www.joacp.org/text.asp?2012/28/1/21/92429</link>
</item>
<item>
<title>Trapezius squeeze test as an indicator for depth of anesthesia for laryngeal mask airway insertion in children</title>
<dc:creator>Sarla Hooda</dc:creator>
<dc:creator>Kiranpreet Kaur</dc:creator>
<dc:creator>Kamal N Rattan</dc:creator>
<dc:creator>Anil K Thakur</dc:creator>
<dc:creator>Kirti Kamal</dc:creator>
<dc:type>Original Article</dc:type>
<dc:source>Journal of Anaesthesiology Clinical Pharmacology 2012 28(1):28-31</dc:source><dc:identifier>doi:10.4103/0970-9185.92430</dc:identifier>
<prism:publicationName>Journal of Anaesthesiology Clinical Pharmacology</prism:publicationName> <prism:doi>10.4103/0970-9185.92430</prism:doi> <prism:url>http://www.joacp.org/text.asp?2012/28/1/28/92430</prism:url> <feedburner:origLink>http://www.joacp.org/text.asp?2012/28/1/28/92430</feedburner:origLink><prism:volume>28</prism:volume><prism:number>1</prism:number> <prism:startingPage>28</prism:startingPage> <prism:endingPage>31</prism:endingPage> 
<guid>http://www.joacp.org/text.asp?2012/28/1/28/92430</guid>
<description><![CDATA[<b>Sarla Hooda, Kiranpreet Kaur, Kamal N Rattan, Anil K Thakur, Kirti Kamal</b><br><br>Journal of Anaesthesiology Clinical Pharmacology 2012 28(1):28-31<br><br>Background: Clinical tests, such as loss of verbal contact, eyelash reflex, corneal reflex, and jaw relaxation, are used to assess the depth of anesthesia. &quot;Trapezius squeeze test&quot; (TST) is one such clinical test. It is a simple test to perform in which 1-2 inches of trapezius muscle is held and squeezed in full thickness and response is evaluated in the form of toe/body movement. 
 Materials and Methods: One hundred pediatric patients between 3 and 5 years of age, scheduled to undergo elective surgery, were included in this study. We evaluated negative TST as an indicator for optimal anesthesia depth for laryngeal mask airway (LMA) insertion in anesthetized spontaneously breathing children. Anesthesia was induced using 4&#x0025; sevoflurane in oxygen. As the child lost the verbal contact or loss of body movement, TST was performed. Test was repeated every 15 s till it became negative. When the TST became negative, a well lubricated, appropriate-size LMA was inserted.
 Results: Mean time for TST to become negative in our study was 271.80 &#x0026;#177; 55.8 s and ease of insertion was excellent in 91 patients and acceptable in 9 patients. LMA was successfully inserted in first attempt in 96&#x0025; patients.
 Conclusions: Negative TST is a reliable indicator for placement of LMA in spontaneously breathing children. Excellent conditions for LMA placement are present in majority of the patients without any untoward effects at this point of time.]]></description>
<pubDate>Tue,31 Jan 2012</pubDate><link>http://www.joacp.org/text.asp?2012/28/1/28/92430</link>
</item>
<item>
<title>Comparative evaluation of midazolam and butorphanol as oral premedication in pediatric patients</title>
<dc:creator>Chandni Sinha</dc:creator>
<dc:creator>Manpreet Kaur</dc:creator>
<dc:creator>Ajeet Kumar</dc:creator>
<dc:creator>Anand Kulkarni</dc:creator>
<dc:creator>M Ambareesha</dc:creator>
<dc:creator>Madhusudan Upadya</dc:creator>
<dc:type>Original Article</dc:type>
<dc:source>Journal of Anaesthesiology Clinical Pharmacology 2012 28(1):32-35</dc:source><dc:identifier>doi:10.4103/0970-9185.92431</dc:identifier>
<prism:publicationName>Journal of Anaesthesiology Clinical Pharmacology</prism:publicationName> <prism:doi>10.4103/0970-9185.92431</prism:doi> <prism:url>http://www.joacp.org/text.asp?2012/28/1/32/92431</prism:url> <feedburner:origLink>http://www.joacp.org/text.asp?2012/28/1/32/92431</feedburner:origLink><prism:volume>28</prism:volume><prism:number>1</prism:number> <prism:startingPage>32</prism:startingPage> <prism:endingPage>35</prism:endingPage> 
<guid>http://www.joacp.org/text.asp?2012/28/1/32/92431</guid>
<description><![CDATA[<b>Chandni Sinha, Manpreet Kaur, Ajeet Kumar, Anand Kulkarni, M Ambareesha, Madhusudan Upadya</b><br><br>Journal of Anaesthesiology Clinical Pharmacology 2012 28(1):32-35<br><br>Background: To compare oral midazolam (0.5 mg/kg) with oral butorphanol (0.2 mg/kg) as a premedication in 60 pediatric patients with regards to sedation, anxiolysis, rescue analgesic requirement, and recovery profile. 
 Materials and Methods: In a double blinded study design, 60 pediatric patients belonging to ASA class I and II between the age group of 2-12 years scheduled for elective surgery were randomized to receive either oral midazolam (group I) or oral butorphanol (group II) 30 min before induction of anesthesia. The children were evaluated for levels of sedation and anxiety at the time of separation from the parents, venepuncture, and at the time of facemask application for induction of anesthesia. Rescue analgesic requirement, postoperative recovery, and complications were also recorded. 
 Results: Butorphanol had better sedation potential than oral midazolam with comparable anxiolysis at the time of separation of children from their parents. Midazolam proved to be a better anxiolytic during venepuncture and facemask application. Butorphanol reduced need for supplemental analgesics perioperatively without an increase in side effects such as nausea, vomiting, or unpleasant postoperative recovery. 
 Conclusion: Oral butorphanol is a better premedication than midazolam in children in view of its excellent sedative and analgesic properties. It does not increase side effects significantly.]]></description>
<pubDate>Tue,31 Jan 2012</pubDate><link>http://www.joacp.org/text.asp?2012/28/1/32/92431</link>
</item>
<item>
<title>Observational study to assess the effectiveness of postoperative pain management of patients undergoing elective cesarean section</title>
<dc:creator>Samina Ismail</dc:creator>
<dc:creator>Khurram Shahzad</dc:creator>
<dc:creator>Faraz Shafiq</dc:creator>
<dc:type>Original Article</dc:type>
<dc:source>Journal of Anaesthesiology Clinical Pharmacology 2012 28(1):36-40</dc:source><dc:identifier>doi:10.4103/0970-9185.92432</dc:identifier>
<prism:publicationName>Journal of Anaesthesiology Clinical Pharmacology</prism:publicationName> <prism:doi>10.4103/0970-9185.92432</prism:doi> <prism:url>http://www.joacp.org/text.asp?2012/28/1/36/92432</prism:url> <feedburner:origLink>http://www.joacp.org/text.asp?2012/28/1/36/92432</feedburner:origLink><prism:volume>28</prism:volume><prism:number>1</prism:number> <prism:startingPage>36</prism:startingPage> <prism:endingPage>40</prism:endingPage> 
<guid>http://www.joacp.org/text.asp?2012/28/1/36/92432</guid>
<description><![CDATA[<b>Samina Ismail, Khurram Shahzad, Faraz Shafiq</b><br><br>Journal of Anaesthesiology Clinical Pharmacology 2012 28(1):36-40<br><br>Background: The study was designed to assess the strategy, effectiveness, and safety of postoperative pain management in patients undergoing elective cesarean section in the obstetric unit of our hospital. 
 Materials and Methods: Patients having elective cesarean section from December 2008 to May 2009 were included in this observational study. We recorded patient&#x0027;s demographics, postoperative pain orders, and analgesia regime on the day of surgery. Anesthesia team, which included one of the investigators, assessed the overall pain since the time of surgery by visual analogue scale (VAS) and also recorded any complications since the time of surgery and patients&#x0027; satisfaction with the pain management. 
 Results: A total of 263 patients were reviewed during the study period. Postoperative analgesia regime was started by the obstetric team in 81&#x0025; of patients and in rest by the anesthesia team. The common modality of pain management was intravenous opioid infusion (94&#x0025;) and coanalgesia was used in 99&#x0025; of patients. The analysis of pain at rest by VAS was between 1 and 3 in 89.7&#x0025;, 4 and 6 in 9.5&#x0025;, and 7 and 10 in 0.8&#x0025; of patients. The VAS on movement was 1-3 in 60.1&#x0025;, 4-6 in 33.1&#x0025;, and 7-10 in 6.8&#x0025; of patients. Patients&#x0027; opinion regarding postoperative pain management was satisfactory in 91.6&#x0025; of patients and unsatisfactory in 8.4&#x0025; of patients. Overall, 9&#x0025; of patients had minor complications, which responded well to treatment.
 Conclusion: The regime for postoperative pain management was mostly started and followed by the obstetric team at the hospital. Although the postoperative pain management was adequate in terms of patients&#x0027; safety, it was not effective according to the goal set by Joint Commission on Accreditation of uniformly low pain score of not more than 3 out of 10 both at rest and with movement.]]></description>
<pubDate>Tue,31 Jan 2012</pubDate><link>http://www.joacp.org/text.asp?2012/28/1/36/92432</link>
</item>
<item>
<title>Enteral nutrition practices in the intensive care unit: Understanding of nursing practices and perspectives</title>
<dc:creator>Babita Gupta</dc:creator>
<dc:creator>Pramendra Agrawal</dc:creator>
<dc:creator>Kapil D Soni</dc:creator>
<dc:creator>Vikas Yadav</dc:creator>
<dc:creator>Roshni Dhakal</dc:creator>
<dc:creator>Shally Khurana</dc:creator>
<dc:creator>MC Misra</dc:creator>
<dc:type>Original Article</dc:type>
<dc:source>Journal of Anaesthesiology Clinical Pharmacology 2012 28(1):41-44</dc:source><dc:identifier>doi:10.4103/0970-9185.92433</dc:identifier>
<prism:publicationName>Journal of Anaesthesiology Clinical Pharmacology</prism:publicationName> <prism:doi>10.4103/0970-9185.92433</prism:doi> <prism:url>http://www.joacp.org/text.asp?2012/28/1/41/92433</prism:url> <feedburner:origLink>http://www.joacp.org/text.asp?2012/28/1/41/92433</feedburner:origLink><prism:volume>28</prism:volume><prism:number>1</prism:number> <prism:startingPage>41</prism:startingPage> <prism:endingPage>44</prism:endingPage> 
<guid>http://www.joacp.org/text.asp?2012/28/1/41/92433</guid>
<description><![CDATA[<b>Babita Gupta, Pramendra Agrawal, Kapil D Soni, Vikas Yadav, Roshni Dhakal, Shally Khurana, MC Misra</b><br><br>Journal of Anaesthesiology Clinical Pharmacology 2012 28(1):41-44<br><br>Background: Adequate nutritional support is important for the comprehensive management of patients in intensive care units (ICUs). 
 Aim: The study was aimed to survey prevalent enteral nutrition practices in the trauma intensive care unit, nurses&#x0027; perception, and their knowledge of enteral feeding. 
 Study Design: The study was conducted in the ICU of a level 1 trauma center, Jai Prakash Narayan Apex Trauma Centre, AIIMS, New Delhi, India. The study design used an audit. 
 Materials and Methods: Sixty questionnaires were distributed and the results analyzed. A database was prepared and the audit was done.
 Results: Forty-two (70&#x0025;) questionnaires were filled and returned. A majority (38) of staff nurses expressed awareness of nutrition guidelines. A large number (32) of staff nurses knew about nutrition protocols of the ICU. Almost all (40) opined enteral nutrition to be the preferred route of nutrition unless contraindicated. All staff nurses were of opinion that enteral nutrition is to be started at the earliest (within 24-48 h of the ICU stay). Everyone opined that the absence of bowel sounds is an absolute contraindication to initiate enteral feeding. Passage of flatus was considered mandatory before starting enteral nutrition by 86&#x0025; of the respondents. Everyone knew that the method of Ryle&#x0027;s tube feeding in their ICU is intermittent boluses. Only 4 staff nurses were unaware of any method to confirm Ryle&#x0027;s tube position. The backrest elevation rate was 100&#x0025;. Gastric residual volumes were always checked, but the amount of the gastric residual volume for the next feed to be withheld varied. The majority said that the unused Ryle&#x0027;s tube feed is to be discarded after 6 h. The most preferred (48&#x0025;) method to upgrade their knowledge of enteral nutrition was from the ICU protocol manual.
 Conclusion: Information generated from this study can be helpful in identifying nutrition practices that are lacking and may be used to review and revise enteral feeding practices where necessary.]]></description>
<pubDate>Tue,31 Jan 2012</pubDate><link>http://www.joacp.org/text.asp?2012/28/1/41/92433</link>
</item>
<item>
<title>Retrospective analysis of snake victims in Northern India admitted in a tertiary level institute</title>
<dc:creator>Syed Moied Ahmed</dc:creator>
<dc:creator>Abu Nadeem</dc:creator>
<dc:creator>Mohd. Sabihul Islam</dc:creator>
<dc:creator>Shiwani Agarwal</dc:creator>
<dc:creator>Lalit Singh</dc:creator>
<dc:type>Original Article</dc:type>
<dc:source>Journal of Anaesthesiology Clinical Pharmacology 2012 28(1):45-50</dc:source><dc:identifier>doi:10.4103/0970-9185.92434</dc:identifier>
<prism:publicationName>Journal of Anaesthesiology Clinical Pharmacology</prism:publicationName> <prism:doi>10.4103/0970-9185.92434</prism:doi> <prism:url>http://www.joacp.org/text.asp?2012/28/1/45/92434</prism:url> <feedburner:origLink>http://www.joacp.org/text.asp?2012/28/1/45/92434</feedburner:origLink><prism:volume>28</prism:volume><prism:number>1</prism:number> <prism:startingPage>45</prism:startingPage> <prism:endingPage>50</prism:endingPage> 
<guid>http://www.joacp.org/text.asp?2012/28/1/45/92434</guid>
<description><![CDATA[<b>Syed Moied Ahmed, Abu Nadeem, Mohd. Sabihul Islam, Shiwani Agarwal, Lalit Singh</b><br><br>Journal of Anaesthesiology Clinical Pharmacology 2012 28(1):45-50<br><br>Context: Snake bites are the common cause of morbidity and mortality in tropical countries. 
 Aims: To analyze the outcome of snake bite victims
 Settings and Design: Retrospective analysis of data from Intensive care unit, Department of Anesthesiology.
 Materials and Methods: All the patients admitted in the intensive care unit for snake bite management during the year May 2004 - April 2009 were retrospectively reviewed. The data included age, sex, month and time of incident, site of bite, dose of anti--snake venom, time of anti--snake venom, administration, duration of mechanical ventilation, complications and death of a victim.
 Statistical analysis used: Pearson&#x0027;s correlation test, paired samples t-test.
 Results and Conclusions: 113 patients reported to the Accident and Emergency with history of snake bite. 26 patients were referred to other hospital, 17 patients were brought dead, and 70 patients were admitted to the intensive care unit. In 59 snake-bite victims, maximum data could be recovered. Krait was the most common type of snake bite reported. There was a male preponderance (69.4&#x0025;) with age ranging between 20 and 40 years (52.5&#x0025;). The mean lag time (time elapsed between bite and first dose of anti--snake venom) was 5.3 &#x0026;#177; 1.4 h and the mean anti-snake venom dose was 12.3 &#x0026;#177; 2.4 vials. There was a positive and significant correlation between lag time and total dose of anti--snake venom (correlation coefficient =0.956, P&lt;0.0001). Overall 72.9&#x0025; patients required mechanical ventilation with a mean duration of 56.2 &#x0026;#177; 16.1 h. 10.2&#x0025; patients sustained cardiac arrest, 8.7&#x0025; patients developed ventilator associated pneumonia, 6.7&#x0025; suffered mild anti-snake venom reaction, 6.7&#x0025; had hypotension and 5.1&#x0025; patients developed renal failure. The overall mortality was 5.1&#x0025;.]]></description>
<pubDate>Tue,31 Jan 2012</pubDate><link>http://www.joacp.org/text.asp?2012/28/1/45/92434</link>
</item>
<item>
<title>Management of swine-flu patients in the intensive care unit: Our experience</title>
<dc:creator>Raktima Anand</dc:creator>
<dc:creator>Akhilesh Gupta</dc:creator>
<dc:creator>Anshu Gupta</dc:creator>
<dc:creator>Sonia Wadhawan</dc:creator>
<dc:creator>Poonam Bhadoria</dc:creator>
<dc:type>Original Article</dc:type>
<dc:source>Journal of Anaesthesiology Clinical Pharmacology 2012 28(1):51-55</dc:source><dc:identifier>doi:10.4103/0970-9185.92436</dc:identifier>
<prism:publicationName>Journal of Anaesthesiology Clinical Pharmacology</prism:publicationName> <prism:doi>10.4103/0970-9185.92436</prism:doi> <prism:url>http://www.joacp.org/text.asp?2012/28/1/51/92436</prism:url> <feedburner:origLink>http://www.joacp.org/text.asp?2012/28/1/51/92436</feedburner:origLink><prism:volume>28</prism:volume><prism:number>1</prism:number> <prism:startingPage>51</prism:startingPage> <prism:endingPage>55</prism:endingPage> 
<guid>http://www.joacp.org/text.asp?2012/28/1/51/92436</guid>
<description><![CDATA[<b>Raktima Anand, Akhilesh Gupta, Anshu Gupta, Sonia Wadhawan, Poonam Bhadoria</b><br><br>Journal of Anaesthesiology Clinical Pharmacology 2012 28(1):51-55<br><br>Background: H1N1 pandemic in 2009-2010 created a state of panic not only in India, but in the whole world. The clinical picture seen with H1N1 is different from the seasonal influenza involving healthy young adults. Critical care management of such patients imposes a challenge for anesthesiologist.
 Materials and Methods: A retrospective analysis of hospitalized positive H1N1 patients was performed from July 2009-June 2010. Those requiring the ventilatory support were included in the study.
 Result: 54 patients were admitted in the swine-flu ward during the study period out of which 19 required ventilatory support. The average day of presentation to the health care facility was 6 th day causing delay in initiation of antiviral therapy and increased severity of the disease. 65&#x0025; of the ventilated patients were having associated comorbidities. Mortality was 74&#x0025; among ventilated patients.
 Conclusion: Positive H1N1 with severe disease profile have a poor outcome. Early identification of high-risk factors and thus early intervention in the form of antiretroviral therapy and respiratory care will help in reducing the overall mortality.]]></description>
<pubDate>Tue,31 Jan 2012</pubDate><link>http://www.joacp.org/text.asp?2012/28/1/51/92436</link>
</item>
<item>
<title>Anesthetic drug wastage in the operation room: A cause for concern</title>
<dc:creator>Kapil Chaudhary</dc:creator>
<dc:creator>Rakesh Garg</dc:creator>
<dc:creator>Anju R Bhalotra</dc:creator>
<dc:creator>Raktima Anand</dc:creator>
<dc:creator>KK Girdhar</dc:creator>
<dc:type>Original Article</dc:type>
<dc:source>Journal of Anaesthesiology Clinical Pharmacology 2012 28(1):56-61</dc:source><dc:identifier>doi:10.4103/0970-9185.92438</dc:identifier>
<prism:publicationName>Journal of Anaesthesiology Clinical Pharmacology</prism:publicationName> <prism:doi>10.4103/0970-9185.92438</prism:doi> <prism:url>http://www.joacp.org/text.asp?2012/28/1/56/92438</prism:url> <feedburner:origLink>http://www.joacp.org/text.asp?2012/28/1/56/92438</feedburner:origLink><prism:volume>28</prism:volume><prism:number>1</prism:number> <prism:startingPage>56</prism:startingPage> <prism:endingPage>61</prism:endingPage> 
<guid>http://www.joacp.org/text.asp?2012/28/1/56/92438</guid>
<description><![CDATA[<b>Kapil Chaudhary, Rakesh Garg, Anju R Bhalotra, Raktima Anand, KK Girdhar</b><br><br>Journal of Anaesthesiology Clinical Pharmacology 2012 28(1):56-61<br><br>Context: The cost of anesthetic technique has three main components, i.e., disposable supplies, equipments, and anesthetic drugs. Drug budgets are an easily identifiable area for short-term savings.
 Aim: To assess and estimate the amount of anesthetic drug wastage in the general surgical operation room. Also, to analyze the financial implications to the hospital due to drug wastage and suggest appropriate steps to prevent or minimize this wastage. 
 Settings and Design: A prospective observational study conducted in the general surgical operation room of a tertiary care hospital.
 Materials and Methods: Drug wastage was considered as the amount of drug left unutilized in the syringes/vials after completion of a case and any ampoule or vial broken while loading. An estimation of the cost of wasted drug was made. 
 Results: Maximal wastage was associated with adrenaline and lignocaine (100&#x0025; and 93.63&#x0025;, respectively). The drugs which accounted for maximum wastage due to not being used after loading into a syringe were adrenaline (95.24&#x0025;), succinylcholine (92.63&#x0025;), lignocaine (92.51&#x0025;), mephentermine (83.80&#x0025;), and atropine (81.82&#x0025;). The cost of wasted drugs for the study duration was 46.57&#x0025; (Rs. 16,044.01) of the total cost of drugs issued/loaded (Rs. 34,449.44). Of this, the cost of wastage of propofol was maximum being 56.27&#x0025; (Rs. 9028.16) of the total wastage cost, followed by rocuronium 17.80&#x0025; (Rs. 2856), vecuronium 5.23&#x0025; (Rs. 840), and neostigmine 4.12&#x0025; (Rs. 661.50).
 Conclusions: Drug wastage and the ensuing financial loss can be significant during the anesthetic management of surgical cases. Propofol, rocuronium, vecuronium, and neostigmine are the drugs which contribute maximally to the total wastage cost. Judicious use of these and other drugs and appropriate prudent measures as suggested can effectively decrease this cost.]]></description>
<pubDate>Tue,31 Jan 2012</pubDate><link>http://www.joacp.org/text.asp?2012/28/1/56/92438</link>
</item>
<item>
<title>Practice trends in use of morphine for control of intraoperative pain: An audit</title>
<dc:creator>Ajai Kumar Jain</dc:creator>
<dc:creator>Surendra Kumar</dc:creator>
<dc:creator>Asha Tyagi</dc:creator>
<dc:type>Original Article</dc:type>
<dc:source>Journal of Anaesthesiology Clinical Pharmacology 2012 28(1):62-65</dc:source><dc:identifier>doi:10.4103/0970-9185.92440</dc:identifier>
<prism:publicationName>Journal of Anaesthesiology Clinical Pharmacology</prism:publicationName> <prism:doi>10.4103/0970-9185.92440</prism:doi> <prism:url>http://www.joacp.org/text.asp?2012/28/1/62/92440</prism:url> <feedburner:origLink>http://www.joacp.org/text.asp?2012/28/1/62/92440</feedburner:origLink><prism:volume>28</prism:volume><prism:number>1</prism:number> <prism:startingPage>62</prism:startingPage> <prism:endingPage>65</prism:endingPage> 
<guid>http://www.joacp.org/text.asp?2012/28/1/62/92440</guid>
<description><![CDATA[<b>Ajai Kumar Jain, Surendra Kumar, Asha Tyagi</b><br><br>Journal of Anaesthesiology Clinical Pharmacology 2012 28(1):62-65<br><br>Background: When using morphine as the sole analgesic during conduct of anesthesia, the fear of its adverse postoperative effects primarily sedation and respiratory depression may impede adequate dosing and analgesia. 
 Aim and Objectives: This audit aims to explore the dosing schedules of morphine used during general anesthesia in our institution and to analyze whether the fear of major side effects leads to suboptimal dosing of morphine with inadequate pain relief.
 Materials and Methods: All subjects scheduled for surgery under general anesthesia wherein morphine was used exclusively for intraoperative analgesia were included in the audit. The audit proforma was completed by the attending anesthesiologist wherein the study period extended from beginning of anesthesia to immediate postoperative period.
 Result: The study population comprised of 158 patients having mean age 33 &#x0026;#177; 14 years and mean weight 52 &#x0026;#177; 14 kg. The dose of morphine administered at induction varied widely from 0.05 to 0.3 mg/kg i.v. The VAS (Visual Analogue Scale) score in immediate postoperative period varied from 0 to 10 (mean 1.7 &#x0026;#177; 2.0) and sedation score from 1 to 5 (mean 3.94 &#x0026;#177; 1.05). Inadequate analgesia with a VAS score &#x0026;#8805;4 was seen in 15&#x0025; patients. Morphine dosage of &gt;0.1 mg/kg was associated with highly significant increase in quality of postoperative analgesia with VAS score &lt;4, and an increase in sedation with sedation score &#x0026;#8804;3 (P value &lt; 0.01). However, none of the patients required active intervention for cardiorespiratory support. 
 Conclusion: The practice of dosing morphine in our institution is highly variable with doses ranging from 0.05 to 0.3 mg/kg. This results in inadequate analgesia in 15&#x0025; patients in postoperative period. Titrating the dose of morphine to expected pain levels inflicted upon by surgical procedures may result in better pain control and less sedated patients postoperatively.]]></description>
<pubDate>Tue,31 Jan 2012</pubDate><link>http://www.joacp.org/text.asp?2012/28/1/62/92440</link>
</item>
<item>
<title>Reasons for cancellation of operation on the day of intended surgery in a multidisciplinary 500 bedded hospital</title>
<dc:creator>Rajender Kumar</dc:creator>
<dc:creator>Ritika Gandhi</dc:creator>
<dc:type>Original Article</dc:type>
<dc:source>Journal of Anaesthesiology Clinical Pharmacology 2012 28(1):66-69</dc:source><dc:identifier>doi:10.4103/0970-9185.92442</dc:identifier>
<prism:publicationName>Journal of Anaesthesiology Clinical Pharmacology</prism:publicationName> <prism:doi>10.4103/0970-9185.92442</prism:doi> <prism:url>http://www.joacp.org/text.asp?2012/28/1/66/92442</prism:url> <feedburner:origLink>http://www.joacp.org/text.asp?2012/28/1/66/92442</feedburner:origLink><prism:volume>28</prism:volume><prism:number>1</prism:number> <prism:startingPage>66</prism:startingPage> <prism:endingPage>69</prism:endingPage> 
<guid>http://www.joacp.org/text.asp?2012/28/1/66/92442</guid>
<description><![CDATA[<b>Rajender Kumar, Ritika Gandhi</b><br><br>Journal of Anaesthesiology Clinical Pharmacology 2012 28(1):66-69<br><br>Background: Cancellation of operations in hospitals is a significant problem with far reaching consequences. This study was planned to evaluate reasons for cancellation of elective surgical operation on the day of surgery in a 500 bedded Government hospital.
 Materials and Methods: The medical records of all the patients, from December 2009 to November 2010, who had their operations cancelled on the day of surgery in all surgical units of the hospital, were audited prospectively. The number of operation cancelled and reasons for cancellation were documented.
 Results: 7272 patients were scheduled for elective surgical procedures during study period; 1286 (17.6 &#x0025;) of these were cancelled on the day of surgery. The highest number of cancellation occurred in the discipline of general surgery (7.1&#x0025;) and the least (0.35&#x0025;) occurred in Ear-Nose-Throat surgery. The most common cause of cancellation was the lack of availability of theater time 809 (63&#x0025;) and patients not turning up 244 (19&#x0025;) patients. 149 cancellations (11.6&#x0025;) were because of medical reasons; 16 (1.2&#x0025;) were cancelled by the surgeon due to a change in the surgical plan; 28 (2.1&#x0025;) were cancelled as patients were not ready for surgery; and 40 (3.1&#x0025;) were cancelled due to equipment failure.].
 Conclusion: Most causes of cancellations of operations are preventable.]]></description>
<pubDate>Tue,31 Jan 2012</pubDate><link>http://www.joacp.org/text.asp?2012/28/1/66/92442</link>
</item>
<item>
<title>Evaluation of the efficacy of hyperbaric oxygen therapy in the management of chronic nonhealing ulcer and role of periwound transcutaneous oximetry as a predictor of wound healing response: A randomized prospective controlled trial</title>
<dc:creator>Sarbjot Kaur</dc:creator>
<dc:creator>Mridula Pawar</dc:creator>
<dc:creator>Neerja Banerjee</dc:creator>
<dc:creator>Rakesh Garg</dc:creator>
<dc:type>Original Article</dc:type>
<dc:source>Journal of Anaesthesiology Clinical Pharmacology 2012 28(1):70-75</dc:source><dc:identifier>doi:10.4103/0970-9185.92444</dc:identifier>
<prism:publicationName>Journal of Anaesthesiology Clinical Pharmacology</prism:publicationName> <prism:doi>10.4103/0970-9185.92444</prism:doi> <prism:url>http://www.joacp.org/text.asp?2012/28/1/70/92444</prism:url> <feedburner:origLink>http://www.joacp.org/text.asp?2012/28/1/70/92444</feedburner:origLink><prism:volume>28</prism:volume><prism:number>1</prism:number> <prism:startingPage>70</prism:startingPage> <prism:endingPage>75</prism:endingPage> 
<guid>http://www.joacp.org/text.asp?2012/28/1/70/92444</guid>
<description><![CDATA[<b>Sarbjot Kaur, Mridula Pawar, Neerja Banerjee, Rakesh Garg</b><br><br>Journal of Anaesthesiology Clinical Pharmacology 2012 28(1):70-75<br><br>Background: Hyperbaric oxygen therapy (HBOT) is a treatment option for chronic nonhealing wounds. Transcutaneous oximetry (TCOM) is used for wound assessment. We undertook a randomized prospective controlled trial to evaluate the role of HBOT in healing of chronic nonhealing wounds and to determine whether TCOM predicts healing.
 Materials and Methods: This study was conducted in 30 consenting patients with nonhealing ulcer. The patients were randomized into group HT (receiving HBOT in addition to conventional treatment) and group CT (receiving only conventional treatment). Duration of treatment in both the groups was 30 days. Wound ulcer was analyzed based on size of the wound, exudates, presence of granulation tissue, and wound tissue scoring. Tissue oxygenation (TcPO 2 ) was measured on 0, 10 th , 20 th , and 30 th day. 
 Results: There was 59&#x0025; reduction in wound area in group HT and 26&#x0025; increase in wound area in group CT. Ten patients in group HT showed improvement in wound score as compared to five patients in group CT. Complete healing was seen in three patients in group HT as compared to none in group CT. Surgical debridement was required in 6 patients in group HT and 10 patients in group CT. One patient in group HT required amputation as compared to five patients in group CT. A positive correlation was found between TcPO 2 value and various markers of wound healing.
 Conclusion: HBOT has a definitive adjunctive role in the management of chronic nonhealing ulcers. It decreases the amputation rate and improves patient outcome. Periwound TcPO 2 may be used as a predictor of response to HBOT and has a positive correlation with wound healing.]]></description>
<pubDate>Tue,31 Jan 2012</pubDate><link>http://www.joacp.org/text.asp?2012/28/1/70/92444</link>
</item>
<item>
<title>A comparative randomized study of paravertebral block versus wound infiltration of bupivacaine in modified radical mastectomy</title>
<dc:creator>Parul Bansal</dc:creator>
<dc:creator>Kirti Nath Saxena</dc:creator>
<dc:creator>Bharti Taneja</dc:creator>
<dc:creator>Bhuwan Sareen</dc:creator>
<dc:type>Original Article</dc:type>
<dc:source>Journal of Anaesthesiology Clinical Pharmacology 2012 28(1):76-80</dc:source><dc:identifier>doi:10.4103/0970-9185.92449</dc:identifier>
<prism:publicationName>Journal of Anaesthesiology Clinical Pharmacology</prism:publicationName> <prism:doi>10.4103/0970-9185.92449</prism:doi> <prism:url>http://www.joacp.org/text.asp?2012/28/1/76/92449</prism:url> <feedburner:origLink>http://www.joacp.org/text.asp?2012/28/1/76/92449</feedburner:origLink><prism:volume>28</prism:volume><prism:number>1</prism:number> <prism:startingPage>76</prism:startingPage> <prism:endingPage>80</prism:endingPage> 
<guid>http://www.joacp.org/text.asp?2012/28/1/76/92449</guid>
<description><![CDATA[<b>Parul Bansal, Kirti Nath Saxena, Bharti Taneja, Bhuwan Sareen</b><br><br>Journal of Anaesthesiology Clinical Pharmacology 2012 28(1):76-80<br><br>Background: Paravertebral block (PVB) has the potential to offer long-lasting pain relief because it can uniquely eliminate cortical responses to thoracic dermatomal stimulation. Benefits include a reduction in postoperative nausea and vomiting (PONV), prolonged postoperative pain relief, and potential for ambulatory discharge. 
 Aims: To compare PVB with local infiltration for postoperative analgesia following modified radical mastectomy (MRM).
 Methods: Forty patients undergoing MRM with axillary dissection were randomly allocated into two groups. Following induction of general anesthesia in group P, a catheter was inserted in the paravertebral space and 0.3 ml/kg of 0.25 &#x0025; of bupivacaine was administered followed by continuous infusion, while in group L, the surgical incision was infiltrated with 0.3 ml/kg of 0.25 &#x0025; bupivacaine. 
 Statistical Analysis: The statistical tests were applied as unpaired student &#x0027;t&#x0027; test/nonparametric test Wilcoxon Mann Whitney test for comparing different parameters such as VAS score and consumption of drugs. The categorical variables such as nausea and vomiting scores, sedation score, and patient satisfaction score were computed by Chi square test/Fisher exact test. 
 Results: VAS score was significantly lower in group P than in group L throughout the postoperative period. The mean alertness score (i.e., less sedation) was higher in group P in the postoperative period than group L. The incidence of PONV was less in PVB group.
 Conclusion: PVB at the end of the surgery results in better postoperative analgesia, lesser incidence of PONV, and better alertness score.]]></description>
<pubDate>Tue,31 Jan 2012</pubDate><link>http://www.joacp.org/text.asp?2012/28/1/76/92449</link>
</item>
<item>
<title>Effect of magnesium sulfate with propofol induction of anesthesia on succinylcholine-induced fasciculations and myalgia</title>
<dc:creator>Mahendra Kumar</dc:creator>
<dc:creator>Nalin Talwar</dc:creator>
<dc:creator>Ritu Goyal</dc:creator>
<dc:creator>Usha Shukla</dc:creator>
<dc:creator>AK Sethi</dc:creator>
<dc:type>Original Article</dc:type>
<dc:source>Journal of Anaesthesiology Clinical Pharmacology 2012 28(1):81-85</dc:source><dc:identifier>doi:10.4103/0970-9185.92451</dc:identifier>
<prism:publicationName>Journal of Anaesthesiology Clinical Pharmacology</prism:publicationName> <prism:doi>10.4103/0970-9185.92451</prism:doi> <prism:url>http://www.joacp.org/text.asp?2012/28/1/81/92451</prism:url> <feedburner:origLink>http://www.joacp.org/text.asp?2012/28/1/81/92451</feedburner:origLink><prism:volume>28</prism:volume><prism:number>1</prism:number> <prism:startingPage>81</prism:startingPage> <prism:endingPage>85</prism:endingPage> 
<guid>http://www.joacp.org/text.asp?2012/28/1/81/92451</guid>
<description><![CDATA[<b>Mahendra Kumar, Nalin Talwar, Ritu Goyal, Usha Shukla, AK Sethi</b><br><br>Journal of Anaesthesiology Clinical Pharmacology 2012 28(1):81-85<br><br>Background: Magnesium sulfate and propofol have been found to be effective against succinylcholine-induced fasciculations and myalgia, respectively, in separate studies. A prospective randomized double blind controlled study was designed to assess the effect of a combination of magnesium sulfate with propofol for induction of anesthesia on succinylcholine-induced fasciculations and myalgia.
 Materials and Methods: Randomly selected 60 adult patients scheduled for elective surgery under general anesthesia were allocated to one of the two equal groups by draw of lots. The patients of MG Group were pretreated with magnesium sulfate 40 mg/kg body weight in 10 ml volume, while patients of NS group were given isotonic saline 0.9&#x0025; in the same volume (10 ml) intravenously slowly over a period of 10 min. Anesthesia was induced with fentanyl 1.5 mcg/kg and propofol 2 mg/kg, followed by administration of succinylcholine 2 mg/kg intravenously. Muscle fasciculations were observed and graded as nil, mild, moderate, or severe. Postoperative myalgia was assessed after 24 h of surgery and graded as nil, mild, moderate, or severe. Observations were made in double blind manner. 
 Results: Demographic data of both groups were comparable (P&gt; 0.05). Muscle fasciculations occurred in 50&#x0025; patients of MG group versus in 100&#x0025; patients of NS group with a significant difference (P&lt; 0.001). After 24 h of surgery, no patient of MG group and 30&#x0025; patients of NS group had myalgia with a significant difference (P&lt; 0.002). 
 Conclusion: Magnesium sulfate 40 mg/kg intravenously may be used with propofol for induction of anesthesia to control succinylcholine-induced fasciculations and myalgia.]]></description>
<pubDate>Tue,31 Jan 2012</pubDate><link>http://www.joacp.org/text.asp?2012/28/1/81/92451</link>
</item>
<item>
<title>Reduction in the incidence of shivering with perioperative dexmedetomidine: A randomized prospective study</title>
<dc:creator>Sukhminder Jit Singh Bajwa</dc:creator>
<dc:creator>Sachin Gupta</dc:creator>
<dc:creator>Jasbir Kaur</dc:creator>
<dc:creator>Amarjit Singh</dc:creator>
<dc:creator>SS Parmar</dc:creator>
<dc:type>Original Article</dc:type>
<dc:source>Journal of Anaesthesiology Clinical Pharmacology 2012 28(1):86-91</dc:source><dc:identifier>doi:10.4103/0970-9185.92452</dc:identifier>
<prism:publicationName>Journal of Anaesthesiology Clinical Pharmacology</prism:publicationName> <prism:doi>10.4103/0970-9185.92452</prism:doi> <prism:url>http://www.joacp.org/text.asp?2012/28/1/86/92452</prism:url> <feedburner:origLink>http://www.joacp.org/text.asp?2012/28/1/86/92452</feedburner:origLink><prism:volume>28</prism:volume><prism:number>1</prism:number> <prism:startingPage>86</prism:startingPage> <prism:endingPage>91</prism:endingPage> 
<guid>http://www.joacp.org/text.asp?2012/28/1/86/92452</guid>
<description><![CDATA[<b>Sukhminder Jit Singh Bajwa, Sachin Gupta, Jasbir Kaur, Amarjit Singh, SS Parmar</b><br><br>Journal of Anaesthesiology Clinical Pharmacology 2012 28(1):86-91<br><br>Background and Aims: Shivering is distressing to the patient and discomforting to the attending anesthesiologist, with a varying degree of success. Various drugs and regimens have been employed to abolish the occurrence of shivering. The present study aims to explore the effectiveness of dexmedetomidine in suppressing the postanesthetic shivering in patients undergoing general anesthesia.
 Materials and Methods: The present study was carried out on 80 patients, in American Society of Anesthesiologists I and
II, aged 22-59 years, who underwent general anesthesia for laparoscopic surgical procedures. Patients were allocated randomly into two groups: group N (n = 40) and group D (n = 40). Group D were administered 1 &#x0026;#901;g/kg of dexmedetomidine intravenously, while group N received similar volume of saline during peri-op period. Cardiorespiratory parameters were observed and recorded during the preop, intraop, and postop periods. Any incidence of postop shivering was observed and recorded as per 4 point scale. Side effects were also observed, recorded, and treated symptomatically. Statistical analysis was carried out using statistical package for social sciences (SPSS) version 15.0 for windows and employing ANOVA and chi-square test with post-hoc comparisons with Bonferroni&#x0027;s correction.
 Results: The two groups were comparable regarding demographic profile (P&gt; 0.05). Incidence of shivering in group N was 42.5&#x0025;, which was statistically highly significant (P = 0.014). Heart rate and mean arterial pressure also showed significant variation clinically and statistically in group D patients during the postop period (P = 0.008 and 0.012). A high incidence of sedation (P = 0.000) and dry mouth (P = 0.000) was observed in group D, whereas the incidence of nausea and vomiting was higher in group N (P = 0.011 and 0.034).
 Conclusions: Dexmedetomidine seems to possess antishivering properties and was found to reduce the occurrence of shivering in patients undergoing general anesthesia.]]></description>
<pubDate>Tue,31 Jan 2012</pubDate><link>http://www.joacp.org/text.asp?2012/28/1/86/92452</link>
</item>
<item>
<title>Desflurane - Revisited</title>
<dc:creator>Mukul Chandra Kapoor</dc:creator>
<dc:creator>Mahesh Vakamudi</dc:creator>
<dc:type>Clinical Pharmacology</dc:type>
<dc:source>Journal of Anaesthesiology Clinical Pharmacology 2012 28(1):92-100</dc:source><dc:identifier>doi:10.4103/0970-9185.92455</dc:identifier>
<prism:publicationName>Journal of Anaesthesiology Clinical Pharmacology</prism:publicationName> <prism:doi>10.4103/0970-9185.92455</prism:doi> <prism:url>http://www.joacp.org/text.asp?2012/28/1/92/92455</prism:url> <feedburner:origLink>http://www.joacp.org/text.asp?2012/28/1/92/92455</feedburner:origLink><prism:volume>28</prism:volume><prism:number>1</prism:number> <prism:startingPage>92</prism:startingPage> <prism:endingPage>100</prism:endingPage> 
<guid>http://www.joacp.org/text.asp?2012/28/1/92/92455</guid>
<description><![CDATA[<b>Mukul Chandra Kapoor, Mahesh Vakamudi</b><br><br>Journal of Anaesthesiology Clinical Pharmacology 2012 28(1):92-100<br><br>The search for an ideal inhalational general anesthetic agent continues. Desflurane, which was recently introduced in the Indian market, possesses favorable pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic properties and is closer to the definition of an ideal agent. It offers the advantage of precise control over depth of anesthesia along with a rapid, predictable, and clear-headed recovery with minimal postoperative sequelae, making it a valuable anesthetic agent for maintenance in adults and pediatric patients in surgeries of all durations. The agent has advantages when used in extremes of age and in the obese. Its use may increase the direct costs of providing anesthetic care. Methods or techniques, such as low-flow anesthesia, to reduce the overall cost and along with minimal environmental implications must be followed.]]></description>
<pubDate>Tue,31 Jan 2012</pubDate><link>http://www.joacp.org/text.asp?2012/28/1/92/92455</link>
</item>
<item>
<title>Perioperative management of a patient with an axial-flow rotary ventricular assist device for laparoscopic ileo-colectomy</title>
<dc:creator>Subramanian Sathishkumar</dc:creator>
<dc:creator>R Kodavatiganti</dc:creator>
<dc:creator>S Plummer</dc:creator>
<dc:creator>K High</dc:creator>
<dc:type>Case Report</dc:type>
<dc:source>Journal of Anaesthesiology Clinical Pharmacology 2012 28(1):101-105</dc:source><dc:identifier>doi:10.4103/0970-9185.92456</dc:identifier>
<prism:publicationName>Journal of Anaesthesiology Clinical Pharmacology</prism:publicationName> <prism:doi>10.4103/0970-9185.92456</prism:doi> <prism:url>http://www.joacp.org/text.asp?2012/28/1/101/92456</prism:url> <feedburner:origLink>http://www.joacp.org/text.asp?2012/28/1/101/92456</feedburner:origLink><prism:volume>28</prism:volume><prism:number>1</prism:number> <prism:startingPage>101</prism:startingPage> <prism:endingPage>105</prism:endingPage> 
<guid>http://www.joacp.org/text.asp?2012/28/1/101/92456</guid>
<description><![CDATA[<b>Subramanian Sathishkumar, R Kodavatiganti, S Plummer, K High</b><br><br>Journal of Anaesthesiology Clinical Pharmacology 2012 28(1):101-105<br><br>The use of mechanical circulatory support devices as a bridge to transplant or destination therapy decreases mortality, improves quality of life, and functional status. The paucity of clinical data and the challenges faced by noncardiac anesthesiologists warrant us to present the perioperative care of a patient with a HeartMate II (Thoratec Corp. Pleasanton, CA, USA) left ventricular assist device (LVAD), who underwent a successful major laparoscopic abdominal surgery. Key issues highlighted are the limitations of oxygen saturation (SpO 2 ) monitoring, accuracy of blood pressure (BP) measurement, and the potential usefulness of intraoperative transesophageal echocardiography (TEE). The hemodynamic changes, impact on the LVAD function during laparoscopic surgery, and the multidisciplinary approach are addressed.]]></description>
<pubDate>Tue,31 Jan 2012</pubDate><link>http://www.joacp.org/text.asp?2012/28/1/101/92456</link>
</item>
<item>
<title>Challenges encountered with argatroban anticoagulation during cardiopulmonary bypass</title>
<dc:creator>Shvetank Agarwal</dc:creator>
<dc:creator>Beth Ullom</dc:creator>
<dc:creator>Yasser Al-Baghdadi</dc:creator>
<dc:creator>Michael Okumura</dc:creator>
<dc:type>Case Report</dc:type>
<dc:source>Journal of Anaesthesiology Clinical Pharmacology 2012 28(1):106-110</dc:source><dc:identifier>doi:10.4103/0970-9185.92458</dc:identifier>
<prism:publicationName>Journal of Anaesthesiology Clinical Pharmacology</prism:publicationName> <prism:doi>10.4103/0970-9185.92458</prism:doi> <prism:url>http://www.joacp.org/text.asp?2012/28/1/106/92458</prism:url> <feedburner:origLink>http://www.joacp.org/text.asp?2012/28/1/106/92458</feedburner:origLink><prism:volume>28</prism:volume><prism:number>1</prism:number> <prism:startingPage>106</prism:startingPage> <prism:endingPage>110</prism:endingPage> 
<guid>http://www.joacp.org/text.asp?2012/28/1/106/92458</guid>
<description><![CDATA[<b>Shvetank Agarwal, Beth Ullom, Yasser Al-Baghdadi, Michael Okumura</b><br><br>Journal of Anaesthesiology Clinical Pharmacology 2012 28(1):106-110<br><br>Use of argatroban as an alternative to heparin during cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB) in patients with heparin-induced thrombocytopenia has gained some attention in the past two decades. Dosing of argatroban during CPB is complex due to lack of complete understanding of its pharmacokinetic profile and the various elements during CPB that may alter its plasma levels. We report a case where the challenges in dosing argatroban led to failure to provide adequate anticoagulation during CPB, as evidenced by clot formation in the oxygenator, and extensive bleeding in the postoperative period.]]></description>
<pubDate>Tue,31 Jan 2012</pubDate><link>http://www.joacp.org/text.asp?2012/28/1/106/92458</link>
</item>
<item>
<title>Anesthetic management of deep brain stimulator implantation in Meige&#x0027;s syndrome</title>
<dc:creator>Kalpesh V Bhoyar</dc:creator>
<dc:creator>Pinakin Gujjar</dc:creator>
<dc:creator>Shashikant Shinde</dc:creator>
<dc:creator>Nirav Kotak</dc:creator>
<dc:type>Case Report</dc:type>
<dc:source>Journal of Anaesthesiology Clinical Pharmacology 2012 28(1):111-113</dc:source><dc:identifier>doi:10.4103/0970-9185.92459</dc:identifier>
<prism:publicationName>Journal of Anaesthesiology Clinical Pharmacology</prism:publicationName> <prism:doi>10.4103/0970-9185.92459</prism:doi> <prism:url>http://www.joacp.org/text.asp?2012/28/1/111/92459</prism:url> <feedburner:origLink>http://www.joacp.org/text.asp?2012/28/1/111/92459</feedburner:origLink><prism:volume>28</prism:volume><prism:number>1</prism:number> <prism:startingPage>111</prism:startingPage> <prism:endingPage>113</prism:endingPage> 
<guid>http://www.joacp.org/text.asp?2012/28/1/111/92459</guid>
<description><![CDATA[<b>Kalpesh V Bhoyar, Pinakin Gujjar, Shashikant Shinde, Nirav Kotak</b><br><br>Journal of Anaesthesiology Clinical Pharmacology 2012 28(1):111-113<br><br>Meige&#x0027;s syndrome is rare form of orofacial dystonia. There is unfortunately no cure, but occasionally patients may improve with time. We present the successful management of a palladial deep brain stimulator (DBS) implantation for Meige&#x0027;s syndrome. Dexmedetomidine infusion was used for sedation. The procedure lasted for around 12 h and the patient was comfortable, responsive, and cooperative over the extended period of time. The surgeons were comfortable with electrophysiologic brain mapping and clinical testing. DBS were implanted, through a burr hole, into the globus pallidus neurophysiological testing under guidance. The pulse generator battery was subcutaneously implanted into the chest wall under general anesthesia. The implanted pulse generator battery was started 2 days later and the patient showed dramatic improvement in his symptoms.]]></description>
<pubDate>Tue,31 Jan 2012</pubDate><link>http://www.joacp.org/text.asp?2012/28/1/111/92459</link>
</item>
<item>
<title>Early presentation of postintubation tracheoesophageal fistula: Perioperative anesthetic management</title>
<dc:creator>Depinder Kaur</dc:creator>
<dc:creator>Saurabh Anand</dc:creator>
<dc:creator>Prakash Sharma</dc:creator>
<dc:creator>Ashwini Kumar</dc:creator>
<dc:type>Case Report</dc:type>
<dc:source>Journal of Anaesthesiology Clinical Pharmacology 2012 28(1):114-116</dc:source><dc:identifier>doi:10.4103/0970-9185.92460</dc:identifier>
<prism:publicationName>Journal of Anaesthesiology Clinical Pharmacology</prism:publicationName> <prism:doi>10.4103/0970-9185.92460</prism:doi> <prism:url>http://www.joacp.org/text.asp?2012/28/1/114/92460</prism:url> <feedburner:origLink>http://www.joacp.org/text.asp?2012/28/1/114/92460</feedburner:origLink><prism:volume>28</prism:volume><prism:number>1</prism:number> <prism:startingPage>114</prism:startingPage> <prism:endingPage>116</prism:endingPage> 
<guid>http://www.joacp.org/text.asp?2012/28/1/114/92460</guid>
<description><![CDATA[<b>Depinder Kaur, Saurabh Anand, Prakash Sharma, Ashwini Kumar</b><br><br>Journal of Anaesthesiology Clinical Pharmacology 2012 28(1):114-116<br><br>Tracheoesophageal fistula (TEF) in adults occurs as a result of trauma, malignancy, cuff-induced tracheal necrosis from prolonged mechanical ventilation, traumatic endotracheal intubation, foreign body ingestion, prolonged presence of rigid nasogastric tube, and surgical complication. Anesthetic management for repair of TEF is a challenge. Challenges include difficulties in oxygenation or ventilation resulting from placement of endotracheal tube in or above the fistula; large fistula defect causing loss of tidal volume with subsequent gastric dilatation, atelactasis, and maintenance of one lung ventilation. The most common cause of acquired nonmalignant TEF is postintubation fistula, which develops after prolonged intubation for ventilatory support. Acquired TEF, which occurs after prolonged intubation, usually develops after 12-200 days of mechanical ventilation, with a mean of 42 days. We present a rare case of TEF that developed after 7 days of intubation. It was a difficult case to be diagnosed as patient had a history of polytrauma, followed by emergency intubation and both these conditions can contribute to tracheobronchial injury.]]></description>
<pubDate>Tue,31 Jan 2012</pubDate><link>http://www.joacp.org/text.asp?2012/28/1/114/92460</link>
</item>
<item>
<title>Anaesthetic management of a child with massive extracranial arteriovenous malformation</title>
<dc:creator>Faisal Shamim</dc:creator>
<dc:creator>Hameed Ullah</dc:creator>
<dc:creator>Azhar Rehman</dc:creator>
<dc:type>Case Report</dc:type>
<dc:source>Journal of Anaesthesiology Clinical Pharmacology 2012 28(1):117-120</dc:source><dc:identifier>doi:10.4103/0970-9185.92461</dc:identifier>
<prism:publicationName>Journal of Anaesthesiology Clinical Pharmacology</prism:publicationName> <prism:doi>10.4103/0970-9185.92461</prism:doi> <prism:url>http://www.joacp.org/text.asp?2012/28/1/117/92461</prism:url> <feedburner:origLink>http://www.joacp.org/text.asp?2012/28/1/117/92461</feedburner:origLink><prism:volume>28</prism:volume><prism:number>1</prism:number> <prism:startingPage>117</prism:startingPage> <prism:endingPage>120</prism:endingPage> 
<guid>http://www.joacp.org/text.asp?2012/28/1/117/92461</guid>
<description><![CDATA[<b>Faisal Shamim, Hameed Ullah, Azhar Rehman</b><br><br>Journal of Anaesthesiology Clinical Pharmacology 2012 28(1):117-120<br><br>Vascular tumors affect the head and neck commonly but arteriovenous malformations are rare. Vascular malformations are often present at birth and grow with the patient, usually only becoming significant later in childhood. Embolization has been the mainstay of treatment in massive and complex arteriovenous malformations. We present a case of massive extracranial arteriovenous malformation in a 7-year-old boy causing significant workload on right heart and respiratory distress. The management of angioembolization under general anaesthesia and anaesthetic concerns are presented.]]></description>
<pubDate>Tue,31 Jan 2012</pubDate><link>http://www.joacp.org/text.asp?2012/28/1/117/92461</link>
</item>
<item>
<title>Postoperative hypertension following radical neck dissection</title>
<dc:creator>Smita Prakash</dc:creator>
<dc:creator>Amy Rapsang</dc:creator>
<dc:creator>S Suresh Kumar</dc:creator>
<dc:creator>Parminder S Bhatia</dc:creator>
<dc:creator>Anoop R Gogia</dc:creator>
<dc:type>Case Report</dc:type>
<dc:source>Journal of Anaesthesiology Clinical Pharmacology 2012 28(1):121-123</dc:source><dc:identifier>doi:10.4103/0970-9185.92462</dc:identifier>
<prism:publicationName>Journal of Anaesthesiology Clinical Pharmacology</prism:publicationName> <prism:doi>10.4103/0970-9185.92462</prism:doi> <prism:url>http://www.joacp.org/text.asp?2012/28/1/121/92462</prism:url> <feedburner:origLink>http://www.joacp.org/text.asp?2012/28/1/121/92462</feedburner:origLink><prism:volume>28</prism:volume><prism:number>1</prism:number> <prism:startingPage>121</prism:startingPage> <prism:endingPage>123</prism:endingPage> 
<guid>http://www.joacp.org/text.asp?2012/28/1/121/92462</guid>
<description><![CDATA[<b>Smita Prakash, Amy Rapsang, S Suresh Kumar, Parminder S Bhatia, Anoop R Gogia</b><br><br>Journal of Anaesthesiology Clinical Pharmacology 2012 28(1):121-123<br><br>Baroreflex failure results in wide excursions of blood pressure and heart rate. We report two cases that developed severe postoperative hypertension after radical neck dissection. Carotid sinus denervation during neck dissection may be the cause of the reflex hypertension once general anesthesia-induced vasodilatation has ended.]]></description>
<pubDate>Tue,31 Jan 2012</pubDate><link>http://www.joacp.org/text.asp?2012/28/1/121/92462</link>
</item>
<item>
<title>Parturient with kyphoscoliosis (operated) for cesarean section</title>
<dc:creator>David G Veliath</dc:creator>
<dc:creator>Raji Sharma</dc:creator>
<dc:creator>RV Ranjan</dc:creator>
<dc:creator>CP Rajesh Kumar</dc:creator>
<dc:creator>TR Ramachandran</dc:creator>
<dc:type>Case Report</dc:type>
<dc:source>Journal of Anaesthesiology Clinical Pharmacology 2012 28(1):124-126</dc:source><dc:identifier>doi:10.4103/0970-9185.92463</dc:identifier>
<prism:publicationName>Journal of Anaesthesiology Clinical Pharmacology</prism:publicationName> <prism:doi>10.4103/0970-9185.92463</prism:doi> <prism:url>http://www.joacp.org/text.asp?2012/28/1/124/92463</prism:url> <feedburner:origLink>http://www.joacp.org/text.asp?2012/28/1/124/92463</feedburner:origLink><prism:volume>28</prism:volume><prism:number>1</prism:number> <prism:startingPage>124</prism:startingPage> <prism:endingPage>126</prism:endingPage> 
<guid>http://www.joacp.org/text.asp?2012/28/1/124/92463</guid>
<description><![CDATA[<b>David G Veliath, Raji Sharma, RV Ranjan, CP Rajesh Kumar, TR Ramachandran</b><br><br>Journal of Anaesthesiology Clinical Pharmacology 2012 28(1):124-126<br><br>Anesthesia for emergency cesarean section for the pregnant patient with surgically corrected scoliosis is associated with potential risks for both mother and the fetus due to alterations in maternal physiology and the pathological changes seen in scoliosis. The anesthetic management must address the well being of both mother and fetus. The need for anesthesia for obstetric delivery in pregnant women with scoliosis is much more than in the normal parturient. We report the successful use of spinal anesthesia in a patient with surgically corrected scoliosis for emergency cesarean section.]]></description>
<pubDate>Tue,31 Jan 2012</pubDate><link>http://www.joacp.org/text.asp?2012/28/1/124/92463</link>
</item>
<item>
<title>Possible mitigation of rocuronium-induced anaphylaxis after administration of sugammadex</title>
<dc:creator>Cyrus Motamed</dc:creator>
<dc:creator>Pascal Baguenard</dc:creator>
<dc:creator>Jean louis Bourgain</dc:creator>
<dc:type>Letter to the Editor</dc:type>
<dc:source>Journal of Anaesthesiology Clinical Pharmacology 2012 28(1):127-128</dc:source><dc:identifier>doi:10.4103/0970-9185.92464</dc:identifier>
<prism:publicationName>Journal of Anaesthesiology Clinical Pharmacology</prism:publicationName> <prism:doi>10.4103/0970-9185.92464</prism:doi> <prism:url>http://www.joacp.org/text.asp?2012/28/1/127/92464</prism:url> <feedburner:origLink>http://www.joacp.org/text.asp?2012/28/1/127/92464</feedburner:origLink><prism:volume>28</prism:volume><prism:number>1</prism:number> <prism:startingPage>127</prism:startingPage> <prism:endingPage>128</prism:endingPage> 
<guid>http://www.joacp.org/text.asp?2012/28/1/127/92464</guid>
<description><![CDATA[<b>Cyrus Motamed, Pascal Baguenard, Jean louis Bourgain</b><br><br>Journal of Anaesthesiology Clinical Pharmacology 2012 28(1):127-128<br><br>]]></description>
<pubDate>Tue,31 Jan 2012</pubDate><link>http://www.joacp.org/text.asp?2012/28/1/127/92464</link>
</item>
<item>
<title>Anesthetic management of tuberculous retropharyngeal abscess in adult</title>
<dc:creator>Sridevi M Mulimani</dc:creator>
<dc:type>Letter to the Editor</dc:type>
<dc:source>Journal of Anaesthesiology Clinical Pharmacology 2012 28(1):128-129</dc:source><dc:identifier>doi:10.4103/0970-9185.92465</dc:identifier>
<prism:publicationName>Journal of Anaesthesiology Clinical Pharmacology</prism:publicationName> <prism:doi>10.4103/0970-9185.92465</prism:doi> <prism:url>http://www.joacp.org/text.asp?2012/28/1/128/92465</prism:url> <feedburner:origLink>http://www.joacp.org/text.asp?2012/28/1/128/92465</feedburner:origLink><prism:volume>28</prism:volume><prism:number>1</prism:number> <prism:startingPage>128</prism:startingPage> <prism:endingPage>129</prism:endingPage> 
<guid>http://www.joacp.org/text.asp?2012/28/1/128/92465</guid>
<description><![CDATA[<b>Sridevi M Mulimani</b><br><br>Journal of Anaesthesiology Clinical Pharmacology 2012 28(1):128-129<br><br>]]></description>
<pubDate>Tue,31 Jan 2012</pubDate><link>http://www.joacp.org/text.asp?2012/28/1/128/92465</link>
</item>
<item>
<title>Airway management during anesthesia for stereotactic placement of intratumoral drug delivery system in a patient with anaplastic astrocytoma</title>
<dc:creator>Christina George</dc:creator>
<dc:creator>VJ Ramesh</dc:creator>
<dc:creator>Jagath Lal Gangadharan</dc:creator>
<dc:creator>Subhash Kanti Konar</dc:creator>
<dc:type>Letter to the Editor</dc:type>
<dc:source>Journal of Anaesthesiology Clinical Pharmacology 2012 28(1):129-130</dc:source><dc:identifier>doi:10.4103/0970-9185.92466</dc:identifier>
<prism:publicationName>Journal of Anaesthesiology Clinical Pharmacology</prism:publicationName> <prism:doi>10.4103/0970-9185.92466</prism:doi> <prism:url>http://www.joacp.org/text.asp?2012/28/1/129/92466</prism:url> <feedburner:origLink>http://www.joacp.org/text.asp?2012/28/1/129/92466</feedburner:origLink><prism:volume>28</prism:volume><prism:number>1</prism:number> <prism:startingPage>129</prism:startingPage> <prism:endingPage>130</prism:endingPage> 
<guid>http://www.joacp.org/text.asp?2012/28/1/129/92466</guid>
<description><![CDATA[<b>Christina George, VJ Ramesh, Jagath Lal Gangadharan, Subhash Kanti Konar</b><br><br>Journal of Anaesthesiology Clinical Pharmacology 2012 28(1):129-130<br><br>]]></description>
<pubDate>Tue,31 Jan 2012</pubDate><link>http://www.joacp.org/text.asp?2012/28/1/129/92466</link>
</item>
<item>
<title>Playing music in operation theatre</title>
<dc:creator>Beuy Joob</dc:creator>
<dc:creator>Viroj Wiwanitkit</dc:creator>
<dc:type>Letter to the Editor</dc:type>
<dc:source>Journal of Anaesthesiology Clinical Pharmacology 2012 28(1):130-131</dc:source><dc:identifier>doi:10.4103/0970-9185.92467</dc:identifier>
<prism:publicationName>Journal of Anaesthesiology Clinical Pharmacology</prism:publicationName> <prism:doi>10.4103/0970-9185.92467</prism:doi> <prism:url>http://www.joacp.org/text.asp?2012/28/1/130/92467</prism:url> <feedburner:origLink>http://www.joacp.org/text.asp?2012/28/1/130/92467</feedburner:origLink><prism:volume>28</prism:volume><prism:number>1</prism:number> <prism:startingPage>130</prism:startingPage> <prism:endingPage>131</prism:endingPage> 
<guid>http://www.joacp.org/text.asp?2012/28/1/130/92467</guid>
<description><![CDATA[<b>Beuy Joob, Viroj Wiwanitkit</b><br><br>Journal of Anaesthesiology Clinical Pharmacology 2012 28(1):130-131<br><br>]]></description>
<pubDate>Tue,31 Jan 2012</pubDate><link>http://www.joacp.org/text.asp?2012/28/1/130/92467</link>
</item>
<item>
<title>Authors&#x0027; reply</title>
<dc:creator>Shyjumon George</dc:creator>
<dc:creator>Shafiq Ahmed</dc:creator>
<dc:creator>Kim J Mammen</dc:creator>
<dc:creator>George Mathews John</dc:creator>
<dc:type>Letter to the Editor</dc:type>
<dc:source>Journal of Anaesthesiology Clinical Pharmacology 2012 28(1):131-131</dc:source><prism:publicationName>Journal of Anaesthesiology Clinical Pharmacology</prism:publicationName> <prism:url>http://www.joacp.org/text.asp?2012/28/1/131/92468</prism:url> <feedburner:origLink>http://www.joacp.org/text.asp?2012/28/1/131/92468</feedburner:origLink><prism:volume>28</prism:volume><prism:number>1</prism:number> <prism:startingPage>131</prism:startingPage> <prism:endingPage>131</prism:endingPage> 
<guid>http://www.joacp.org/text.asp?2012/28/1/131/92468</guid>
<description><![CDATA[<b>Shyjumon George, Shafiq Ahmed, Kim J Mammen, George Mathews John</b><br><br>Journal of Anaesthesiology Clinical Pharmacology 2012 28(1):131-131<br><br>]]></description>
<pubDate>Tue,31 Jan 2012</pubDate><link>http://www.joacp.org/text.asp?2012/28/1/131/92468</link>
</item>
<item>
<title>Intubating laryngeal mask airway with transplanted pilot balloon&#x003F;</title>
<dc:creator>Vinod Bala</dc:creator>
<dc:creator>Anju Gupta</dc:creator>
<dc:creator>Nishkarsh Gupta</dc:creator>
<dc:creator>Mridula Pawar</dc:creator>
<dc:type>Letter to the Editor</dc:type>
<dc:source>Journal of Anaesthesiology Clinical Pharmacology 2012 28(1):131-132</dc:source><dc:identifier>doi:10.4103/0970-9185.92469</dc:identifier>
<prism:publicationName>Journal of Anaesthesiology Clinical Pharmacology</prism:publicationName> <prism:doi>10.4103/0970-9185.92469</prism:doi> <prism:url>http://www.joacp.org/text.asp?2012/28/1/131/92469</prism:url> <feedburner:origLink>http://www.joacp.org/text.asp?2012/28/1/131/92469</feedburner:origLink><prism:volume>28</prism:volume><prism:number>1</prism:number> <prism:startingPage>131</prism:startingPage> <prism:endingPage>132</prism:endingPage> 
<guid>http://www.joacp.org/text.asp?2012/28/1/131/92469</guid>
<description><![CDATA[<b>Vinod Bala, Anju Gupta, Nishkarsh Gupta, Mridula Pawar</b><br><br>Journal of Anaesthesiology Clinical Pharmacology 2012 28(1):131-132<br><br>]]></description>
<pubDate>Tue,31 Jan 2012</pubDate><link>http://www.joacp.org/text.asp?2012/28/1/131/92469</link>
</item>
<item>
<title>Accidental intraoperative avulsion of external inflation tubing of armored endotracheal tube</title>
<dc:creator>Shyam Bhandari</dc:creator>
<dc:creator>Surender Pal Gupta</dc:creator>
<dc:creator>Kapil Gupta</dc:creator>
<dc:creator>Amitabh Kumar</dc:creator>
<dc:type>Letter to the Editor</dc:type>
<dc:source>Journal of Anaesthesiology Clinical Pharmacology 2012 28(1):132-133</dc:source><dc:identifier>doi:10.4103/0970-9185.92470</dc:identifier>
<prism:publicationName>Journal of Anaesthesiology Clinical Pharmacology</prism:publicationName> <prism:doi>10.4103/0970-9185.92470</prism:doi> <prism:url>http://www.joacp.org/text.asp?2012/28/1/132/92470</prism:url> <feedburner:origLink>http://www.joacp.org/text.asp?2012/28/1/132/92470</feedburner:origLink><prism:volume>28</prism:volume><prism:number>1</prism:number> <prism:startingPage>132</prism:startingPage> <prism:endingPage>133</prism:endingPage> 
<guid>http://www.joacp.org/text.asp?2012/28/1/132/92470</guid>
<description><![CDATA[<b>Shyam Bhandari, Surender Pal Gupta, Kapil Gupta, Amitabh Kumar</b><br><br>Journal of Anaesthesiology Clinical Pharmacology 2012 28(1):132-133<br><br>]]></description>
<pubDate>Tue,31 Jan 2012</pubDate><link>http://www.joacp.org/text.asp?2012/28/1/132/92470</link>
</item>
<item>
<title>Leak in circuit: An unusual cause!</title>
<dc:creator>Jyotsna Punj</dc:creator>
<dc:creator>Meenu Batra</dc:creator>
<dc:creator>V Darlong</dc:creator>
<dc:creator>R Pandey</dc:creator>
<dc:type>Letter to the Editor</dc:type>
<dc:source>Journal of Anaesthesiology Clinical Pharmacology 2012 28(1):133-134</dc:source><dc:identifier>doi:10.4103/0970-9185.92471</dc:identifier>
<prism:publicationName>Journal of Anaesthesiology Clinical Pharmacology</prism:publicationName> <prism:doi>10.4103/0970-9185.92471</prism:doi> <prism:url>http://www.joacp.org/text.asp?2012/28/1/133/92471</prism:url> <feedburner:origLink>http://www.joacp.org/text.asp?2012/28/1/133/92471</feedburner:origLink><prism:volume>28</prism:volume><prism:number>1</prism:number> <prism:startingPage>133</prism:startingPage> <prism:endingPage>134</prism:endingPage> 
<guid>http://www.joacp.org/text.asp?2012/28/1/133/92471</guid>
<description><![CDATA[<b>Jyotsna Punj, Meenu Batra, V Darlong, R Pandey</b><br><br>Journal of Anaesthesiology Clinical Pharmacology 2012 28(1):133-134<br><br>]]></description>
<pubDate>Tue,31 Jan 2012</pubDate><link>http://www.joacp.org/text.asp?2012/28/1/133/92471</link>
</item>
<item>
<title>Fospropofol: Pharmacokinetics&#x003F;</title>
<dc:creator>Bharti Mahajan</dc:creator>
<dc:creator>Sandeep Kaushal</dc:creator>
<dc:creator>Rajesh Mahajan</dc:creator>
<dc:type>Letter to the Editor</dc:type>
<dc:source>Journal of Anaesthesiology Clinical Pharmacology 2012 28(1):134-135</dc:source><dc:identifier>doi:10.4103/0970-9185.92472</dc:identifier>
<prism:publicationName>Journal of Anaesthesiology Clinical Pharmacology</prism:publicationName> <prism:doi>10.4103/0970-9185.92472</prism:doi> <prism:url>http://www.joacp.org/text.asp?2012/28/1/134/92472</prism:url> <feedburner:origLink>http://www.joacp.org/text.asp?2012/28/1/134/92472</feedburner:origLink><prism:volume>28</prism:volume><prism:number>1</prism:number> <prism:startingPage>134</prism:startingPage> <prism:endingPage>135</prism:endingPage> 
<guid>http://www.joacp.org/text.asp?2012/28/1/134/92472</guid>
<description><![CDATA[<b>Bharti Mahajan, Sandeep Kaushal, Rajesh Mahajan</b><br><br>Journal of Anaesthesiology Clinical Pharmacology 2012 28(1):134-135<br><br>]]></description>
<pubDate>Tue,31 Jan 2012</pubDate><link>http://www.joacp.org/text.asp?2012/28/1/134/92472</link>
</item>
<item>
<title>Response: Fospropofol: Pharmacokinetics&#x003F;</title>
<dc:creator>Girish M Bengalorkar</dc:creator>
<dc:creator>K Bhuvana</dc:creator>
<dc:creator>N Sarala</dc:creator>
<dc:creator>TN Kumar</dc:creator>
<dc:type>Letter to the Editor</dc:type>
<dc:source>Journal of Anaesthesiology Clinical Pharmacology 2012 28(1):135-136</dc:source><dc:identifier>doi:10.4103/0970-9185.92473</dc:identifier>
<prism:publicationName>Journal of Anaesthesiology Clinical Pharmacology</prism:publicationName> <prism:doi>10.4103/0970-9185.92473</prism:doi> <prism:url>http://www.joacp.org/text.asp?2012/28/1/135/92473</prism:url> <feedburner:origLink>http://www.joacp.org/text.asp?2012/28/1/135/92473</feedburner:origLink><prism:volume>28</prism:volume><prism:number>1</prism:number> <prism:startingPage>135</prism:startingPage> <prism:endingPage>136</prism:endingPage> 
<guid>http://www.joacp.org/text.asp?2012/28/1/135/92473</guid>
<description><![CDATA[<b>Girish M Bengalorkar, K Bhuvana, N Sarala, TN Kumar</b><br><br>Journal of Anaesthesiology Clinical Pharmacology 2012 28(1):135-136<br><br>]]></description>
<pubDate>Tue,31 Jan 2012</pubDate><link>http://www.joacp.org/text.asp?2012/28/1/135/92473</link>
</item>
<item>
<title>Paresthesias at multiple levels: A rare neurological manifestation of epidural anesthesia</title>
<dc:creator>Ravi Jindal</dc:creator>
<dc:creator>Sukhminder Jit Singh Bajwa</dc:creator>
<dc:type>Letter to the Editor</dc:type>
<dc:source>Journal of Anaesthesiology Clinical Pharmacology 2012 28(1):136-137</dc:source><dc:identifier>doi:10.4103/0970-9185.92474</dc:identifier>
<prism:publicationName>Journal of Anaesthesiology Clinical Pharmacology</prism:publicationName> <prism:doi>10.4103/0970-9185.92474</prism:doi> <prism:url>http://www.joacp.org/text.asp?2012/28/1/136/92474</prism:url> <feedburner:origLink>http://www.joacp.org/text.asp?2012/28/1/136/92474</feedburner:origLink><prism:volume>28</prism:volume><prism:number>1</prism:number> <prism:startingPage>136</prism:startingPage> <prism:endingPage>137</prism:endingPage> 
<guid>http://www.joacp.org/text.asp?2012/28/1/136/92474</guid>
<description><![CDATA[<b>Ravi Jindal, Sukhminder Jit Singh Bajwa</b><br><br>Journal of Anaesthesiology Clinical Pharmacology 2012 28(1):136-137<br><br>]]></description>
<pubDate>Tue,31 Jan 2012</pubDate><link>http://www.joacp.org/text.asp?2012/28/1/136/92474</link>
</item>
<item>
<title>Use of loss of resistance, to carbon dioxide, in identifying the epidural space</title>
<dc:creator>RA Junka</dc:creator>
<dc:creator>L Chan</dc:creator>
<dc:creator>R Moises</dc:creator>
<dc:creator>E Panico</dc:creator>
<dc:creator>V Hazelwood</dc:creator>
<dc:creator>GM Atlas</dc:creator>
<dc:type>Letter to the Editor</dc:type>
<dc:source>Journal of Anaesthesiology Clinical Pharmacology 2012 28(1):137-138</dc:source><dc:identifier>doi:10.4103/0970-9185.92475</dc:identifier>
<prism:publicationName>Journal of Anaesthesiology Clinical Pharmacology</prism:publicationName> <prism:doi>10.4103/0970-9185.92475</prism:doi> <prism:url>http://www.joacp.org/text.asp?2012/28/1/137/92475</prism:url> <feedburner:origLink>http://www.joacp.org/text.asp?2012/28/1/137/92475</feedburner:origLink><prism:volume>28</prism:volume><prism:number>1</prism:number> <prism:startingPage>137</prism:startingPage> <prism:endingPage>138</prism:endingPage> 
<guid>http://www.joacp.org/text.asp?2012/28/1/137/92475</guid>
<description><![CDATA[<b>RA Junka, L Chan, R Moises, E Panico, V Hazelwood, GM Atlas</b><br><br>Journal of Anaesthesiology Clinical Pharmacology 2012 28(1):137-138<br><br>]]></description>
<pubDate>Tue,31 Jan 2012</pubDate><link>http://www.joacp.org/text.asp?2012/28/1/137/92475</link>
</item>
<item>
<title>Safe practices in epidural catheter tunneling</title>
<dc:creator>Mukesh Tripathi</dc:creator>
<dc:type>Letter to the Editor</dc:type>
<dc:source>Journal of Anaesthesiology Clinical Pharmacology 2012 28(1):138-139</dc:source><dc:identifier>doi:10.4103/0970-9185.92476</dc:identifier>
<prism:publicationName>Journal of Anaesthesiology Clinical Pharmacology</prism:publicationName> <prism:doi>10.4103/0970-9185.92476</prism:doi> <prism:url>http://www.joacp.org/text.asp?2012/28/1/138/92476</prism:url> <feedburner:origLink>http://www.joacp.org/text.asp?2012/28/1/138/92476</feedburner:origLink><prism:volume>28</prism:volume><prism:number>1</prism:number> <prism:startingPage>138</prism:startingPage> <prism:endingPage>139</prism:endingPage> 
<guid>http://www.joacp.org/text.asp?2012/28/1/138/92476</guid>
<description><![CDATA[<b>Mukesh Tripathi</b><br><br>Journal of Anaesthesiology Clinical Pharmacology 2012 28(1):138-139<br><br>]]></description>
<pubDate>Tue,31 Jan 2012</pubDate><link>http://www.joacp.org/text.asp?2012/28/1/138/92476</link>
</item>
<item>
<title>Delayed pharyngoesophageal perforation following anterior cervical spine surgery: An incidental finding</title>
<dc:creator>Tejesh C Anandaswamy</dc:creator>
<dc:creator>Vinayak Seenappa Pujari</dc:creator>
<dc:creator>Shivakumar Shivanna</dc:creator>
<dc:creator>AC Manjunath</dc:creator>
<dc:type>Letter to the Editor</dc:type>
<dc:source>Journal of Anaesthesiology Clinical Pharmacology 2012 28(1):139-140</dc:source><dc:identifier>doi:10.4103/0970-9185.92477</dc:identifier>
<prism:publicationName>Journal of Anaesthesiology Clinical Pharmacology</prism:publicationName> <prism:doi>10.4103/0970-9185.92477</prism:doi> <prism:url>http://www.joacp.org/text.asp?2012/28/1/139/92477</prism:url> <feedburner:origLink>http://www.joacp.org/text.asp?2012/28/1/139/92477</feedburner:origLink><prism:volume>28</prism:volume><prism:number>1</prism:number> <prism:startingPage>139</prism:startingPage> <prism:endingPage>140</prism:endingPage> 
<guid>http://www.joacp.org/text.asp?2012/28/1/139/92477</guid>
<description><![CDATA[<b>Tejesh C Anandaswamy, Vinayak Seenappa Pujari, Shivakumar Shivanna, AC Manjunath</b><br><br>Journal of Anaesthesiology Clinical Pharmacology 2012 28(1):139-140<br><br>]]></description>
<pubDate>Tue,31 Jan 2012</pubDate><link>http://www.joacp.org/text.asp?2012/28/1/139/92477</link>
</item>
<item>
<title>Posttracheostomy tracheoesophageal fistula</title>
<dc:creator>Manoj K Sanwal</dc:creator>
<dc:creator>Pragati Ganjoo</dc:creator>
<dc:creator>Monica S Tandon</dc:creator>
<dc:type>Letter to the Editor</dc:type>
<dc:source>Journal of Anaesthesiology Clinical Pharmacology 2012 28(1):140-141</dc:source><dc:identifier>doi:10.4103/0970-9185.92478</dc:identifier>
<prism:publicationName>Journal of Anaesthesiology Clinical Pharmacology</prism:publicationName> <prism:doi>10.4103/0970-9185.92478</prism:doi> <prism:url>http://www.joacp.org/text.asp?2012/28/1/140/92478</prism:url> <feedburner:origLink>http://www.joacp.org/text.asp?2012/28/1/140/92478</feedburner:origLink><prism:volume>28</prism:volume><prism:number>1</prism:number> <prism:startingPage>140</prism:startingPage> <prism:endingPage>141</prism:endingPage> 
<guid>http://www.joacp.org/text.asp?2012/28/1/140/92478</guid>
<description><![CDATA[<b>Manoj K Sanwal, Pragati Ganjoo, Monica S Tandon</b><br><br>Journal of Anaesthesiology Clinical Pharmacology 2012 28(1):140-141<br><br>]]></description>
<pubDate>Tue,31 Jan 2012</pubDate><link>http://www.joacp.org/text.asp?2012/28/1/140/92478</link>
</item>
<item>
<title>Videoendoscope-guided nasotracheal intubation in ankylozing spondylitis</title>
<dc:creator>Sabyasachi Das</dc:creator>
<dc:creator>Mohan C Mandal</dc:creator>
<dc:creator>Sunil K Sah</dc:creator>
<dc:creator>Pralay S Ghosh</dc:creator>
<dc:type>Letter to the Editor</dc:type>
<dc:source>Journal of Anaesthesiology Clinical Pharmacology 2012 28(1):141-143</dc:source><dc:identifier>doi:10.4103/0970-9185.92479</dc:identifier>
<prism:publicationName>Journal of Anaesthesiology Clinical Pharmacology</prism:publicationName> <prism:doi>10.4103/0970-9185.92479</prism:doi> <prism:url>http://www.joacp.org/text.asp?2012/28/1/141/92479</prism:url> <feedburner:origLink>http://www.joacp.org/text.asp?2012/28/1/141/92479</feedburner:origLink><prism:volume>28</prism:volume><prism:number>1</prism:number> <prism:startingPage>141</prism:startingPage> <prism:endingPage>143</prism:endingPage> 
<guid>http://www.joacp.org/text.asp?2012/28/1/141/92479</guid>
<description><![CDATA[<b>Sabyasachi Das, Mohan C Mandal, Sunil K Sah, Pralay S Ghosh</b><br><br>Journal of Anaesthesiology Clinical Pharmacology 2012 28(1):141-143<br><br>]]></description>
<pubDate>Tue,31 Jan 2012</pubDate><link>http://www.joacp.org/text.asp?2012/28/1/141/92479</link>
</item>
<item>
<title>Anesthetic management of a 137-year-old patient fracture of neck femur</title>
<dc:creator>Samridhi Nanda</dc:creator>
<dc:creator>Anju Gupta</dc:creator>
<dc:creator>Amit Kulshreshtha</dc:creator>
<dc:creator>Poonam Kalra</dc:creator>
<dc:creator>Meenakshi Sharma</dc:creator>
<dc:type>Letter to the Editor</dc:type>
<dc:source>Journal of Anaesthesiology Clinical Pharmacology 2012 28(1):143-144</dc:source><dc:identifier>doi:10.4103/0970-9185.92480</dc:identifier>
<prism:publicationName>Journal of Anaesthesiology Clinical Pharmacology</prism:publicationName> <prism:doi>10.4103/0970-9185.92480</prism:doi> <prism:url>http://www.joacp.org/text.asp?2012/28/1/143/92480</prism:url> <feedburner:origLink>http://www.joacp.org/text.asp?2012/28/1/143/92480</feedburner:origLink><prism:volume>28</prism:volume><prism:number>1</prism:number> <prism:startingPage>143</prism:startingPage> <prism:endingPage>144</prism:endingPage> 
<guid>http://www.joacp.org/text.asp?2012/28/1/143/92480</guid>
<description><![CDATA[<b>Samridhi Nanda, Anju Gupta, Amit Kulshreshtha, Poonam Kalra, Meenakshi Sharma</b><br><br>Journal of Anaesthesiology Clinical Pharmacology 2012 28(1):143-144<br><br>]]></description>
<pubDate>Tue,31 Jan 2012</pubDate><link>http://www.joacp.org/text.asp?2012/28/1/143/92480</link>
</item>

</channel></rss> 
