|Year : 2010 | Volume
| Issue : 4 | Page : 475-479
Respiratory changes during spinal anaesthesia for gynaecological laparoscopic surgery
Raju N Pusapati1, T Sivashanmugam1, M Ravishankar2
1 Assistant Professors, Department of Anaesthesiology and Critical Care, Mahatma Gandhi Medical College & Research Institute, Puducherry, 607 402, India
2 Professor and Head, Department of Anaesthesiology and Critical Care, Mahatma Gandhi Medical College & Research Institute, Puducherry, 607 402, India
|Date of Web Publication||3-Feb-2011|
Assistant Professors, Department of Anaesthesiology and Critical Care, Mahatma Gandhi Medical College & Research Institute, Puducherry, 607 402
Source of Support: None, Conflict of Interest: None
| Abstract|| |
Background: It is currently presumed that spinal anaesthesia can compromise respiratory muscle function during carbon dioxide (CO2) pneumoperitoneum. This observational study was designed to delineate the respiratory effects of CO2 pneumoperitoneum under spinal anaesthesia.
Patients & Methods: Forty one patients undergoing elective gynecological laparoscopy were administered spinal anaesthesia with 15 mg heavy bupivacaine and 50 mcg of fentanyl. Heart rare, blood pressure, tidal volume, respiratory rate and end tidal CO2 were serially recorded before, during and after the pneumoperitoneum. Arterial blood gas analysis was done before and 20 min after initiation of pneumoperitoneum.
Results: The mean heart rate and blood pressure decreased by less than 20% of the preoperative value. The mean tidal volume decreased from 353 ± 81(Standard Deviation) to 299±95 ml, p = 0.032, over the first 9 min after the pneumoperitoneum with a complete recovery towards the base line, 340 ± 72 ml, within 30 min during the surgery. The maximal inspiratory capacity declined from 1308±324 ml to 1067±296 ml at 20 min and recovered to 1187±267 ml, 5min after decompression. There was no observed change in the respiratory rate. Similarly, increase in the end tidal CO2 from 31.68±4.13 to 37.62±4.21 mmHg, p = 0.000, reached a plateau around 15 min and declined after decompression. Arterial carbon dioxide showed a corresponding increase at 20 min without change in arterial to end tidal CO2 difference. All observed changes were within the physiological limits.
Conclusion: In a conscious patient undergoing laparoscopy with pneumoperitoneum, under spinal anaesthesia, the preserved inspiratory diaphragmatic activity maintains ventilation and, the gas exchange within physiological limits. Hence it is a safe alternative to general anaesthesia.
Keywords: Spinal, Pneumoperitonium, Respiratory changes
|How to cite this article:|
Pusapati RN, Sivashanmugam T, Ravishankar M. Respiratory changes during spinal anaesthesia for gynaecological laparoscopic surgery. J Anaesthesiol Clin Pharmacol 2010;26:475-9
|How to cite this URL:|
Pusapati RN, Sivashanmugam T, Ravishankar M. Respiratory changes during spinal anaesthesia for gynaecological laparoscopic surgery. J Anaesthesiol Clin Pharmacol [serial online] 2010 [cited 2020 Dec 2];26:475-9. Available from: https://www.joacp.org/text.asp?2010/26/4/475/74588
General anaesthesia with muscle relaxation and controlled ventilation has been the preferred anaesthetic technique for laparoscopic procedures utilizing carbon dioxide (CO2 ) as insufflating gas for pneumoperitoneum. Spinal anaesthesia was routinely deferred because of the suppressive effect on the compensatory responses for increased intra abdominal pressure and increased CO 2 load. The referred shoulder pain arising from C5 dermatome also needs to be abolished. Hence general anaesthesia with controlled ventilation is adopted for even minor and diagnostic laparoscopic procedures. Differential spinal anaesthesia with lidocaine in combination with fentanyl had been satisfactorily utilized for short duration gynaecological laparoscopy. ,,,,, These studies focused on haemodynamic stability, post operative recovery and economic comparison with general anaesthesia and concluded that spinal anaesthesia with narcotic and local anaesthetic combination can be administered without haemodynamic suppression and discomfort to the patient.
The respiratory dynamics have not been satisfactorily analysed and addressed to recommend spinal anaesthesia as a safe alternative to general anaesthesia. Hence the present study has been designed to observe the respiratory changes under spinal anaesthesia with narcotic and local anaesthetic combination.
| Patients & Methods|| |
The study protocol was approved by the Hospital research and ethics committee. ASA 1 & 2 patients scheduled for elective gynaecological laparoscopy during the period of April 2006 to December 2007 were sampled for the study. A random sampling of sixty patients was done using computer generated random table based on the total number of gynaecological laparoscopy(103) done on the previous year. The selected patients were approached and informed consent was obtained for enrollment in the study. Patients who did not give consent for recruitment into the study and those who were obese were excluded. Forty one women thus recruited were premedicated with ranitidine 150 mg and diazepam 10 mg orally the night before and the morning of surgery. In the operating room monitoring of ECG, noninvasive blood pressure, pulse oximetry, end tidal carbon dioxide (P E'CO2), respiratory rate and exhaled tidal volume were established using multi parameter monitor (compact S/5, Datex Ohmeda, Finland). The monitor utilizes a compact airway module (E-COV) which measures the flow and the gases near the patient airway through a combined flow sensor and gas sampler unit (D-lite+).
Spinal anaesthesia was administered under aseptic precaution at L3-L4 interspace with a mixture of hyperbaric bupivacaine 15 mg (3 ml) and 50 mcg (1 ml) of fentanyl. This mixture had a specific gravity of 1.0184. The patients were given lithotomy position with 10° head down tilt immediately after spinal to ensure total sensory block of T4-5. The soft sealing transparent face mask with the D-lite+ sensor was then secured over the patient's face in a comfortable and air tight manner. They were allowed to breath comfortably in to the atmosphere through the sensor which was attached to the mask.
The heart rate, systolic and diastolic blood pressure and oxygen saturation were monitored from the time the patient came to operating room. The P E'CO2, respiratory rate and tidal volume monitoring started after the mask was secured to the face. The patients were stabilized in lithotomy position with 10° head down tilt for a period of 10 minutes, when the abdomen was prepared for Verres needle insertion. For the study, the satisfactory placement of Verres needle, before initiation of CO 2 insufflation was marked as Time 0. The parameters were recorded at time 0, then every minute for 10 min followed by every 5 min till 30 min after pneumoperitoneum. Another set of parameters were recorded before deflation of pneumoperitoneum and 5 min thereafter. Arterial blood gas analysis was done at time 0 and 20 min after pneumoperitoneum. Maximal inspiratory capacity was measured at the same intervals after ABG sampling and after decompression. Intra abdominal pressure was adjusted to have a comfortable working field (mean 8 (±1) cmH2O).
Total sensory block and analgesic levels were assessed by applying constant pressure with a blunted needle in each dermatome starting from the area of 'no sensation' and moving cephalad up to C3 dermatome. The dermatome at which the patient felt the pressure but no pain was taken as level of total sensory blockade. The dermatome where the patient felt both pressure and pain was taken as analgesic level. General anaesthesia was considered whenever the total sensory block level was below T8 dermatome. At the end of the surgery patients were observed for any side effects in the recovery area till the total sensory block regressed below the level of L1 before being transferred to the postoperative ward.
Oxygen was supplemented with 35% venture adapter whenever the oxygen saturation declined below 94%. In case of respiratory insufficiency noninvasive ventilation was planned with the Servo i ventilator, which was tested and kept ready with circuit compliance compensated and preset in NIV mode with a pressure support of 5 cmH2O; end expiratory pressure of zero, with a flow trigger and inspired oxygen concentration (FIO2) of 0.21. Respiratory insufficiency was defined as Minute ventilation of less than 100 ml. kg -1 , computed and displayed on the monitor screen and / or subjective breathing difficulty not relieved by reassurance. Incremental boluses of atropine and mephentermine were administered if heart rate dropped less than 50 / min, or the systolic blood pressure dropped more than 20% from the base line respectively.
The recorded parameters were analyzed using SPSS 15 statistical software using general linear model repeated measures (ANOVA) for multiple comparisons, comparing within subject effect and confidence interval adjustment using Bonferroni correction and paired "t" test. P value < 0.05 is taken as significant. The values are expressed as mean ± Standard Deviation.
| Results|| |
Thirty seven patients were included for analysis and 4 patients withdrawn from the study [Table 1]. The mean heart rate, systolic and diastolic blood pressure decreased by less than 20% compared to the preoperative value at any time interval [Figure 1]. Nine patients required one dose of 6mg mephentermine; none of them required continuous pharmacological support [Table 2]. There was an initial fall in the mean tidal volume compared to the baseline, from 353 ± 81 to 299 ± 95 ml, p=0.032, over the first 9 min after pneumoperitoneum with a complete recovery towards the base line, 340 ± 72 ml, in 30 min during surgery. There was no observed change in the respiratory rate [Figure 2]. Similarly the end tidal carbon dioxide increased in a stepwise manner over the first 10 min from 31.68 ± 4.13 to 36.57 ± 4.5 mmHg (p=0.000) and reached a plateau between 15 th and 30 th min and declined after deflation [Figure 3]. Arterial CO2 tension showed a corresponding increase at 20 min without significant change in arterial to end tidal carbon dioxide difference [Table 3]. The maximal inspiratory capacity declined from 1308 ± 324 ml to 1067 ± 296 ml at 20 min and recovered to 1187 ± 267 ml, 5min after decompression. All the observed changes were well within physiological limits. Three patients needed intravenous fentanyl supplementation (20mcg) for shoulder pain, one patient had pruritus and all others were comfortable throughout the procedure. No patient had respiratory insufficiency [Table 2].
|Figure 1: Percentage change of heart rate ( ), systolic ( ) and diastolic ( ) blood pressure from baseline (time 0) plotted over time.|
Click here to view
|Figure 2: Changes in tidal volume () and respiratory rate () plotted overtime, expressed as mean and standard deviation, interpolation line center step|
* p = 0.032 compared to time 0
b1, b2 – Changing time intervals
b2 – varied from 40 to 120 min
BD – Before decompression of CO2 pneumoperitoneum
AD – After decompression of CO2 pneumoperitoneum
Click here to view
|Figure 3: Changes in end tidal CO2 () plotted over time, expressed as mean and standard deviation, interpolation line center step.|
* p < 0.05 compared to previous time interval
** p < 0.005 compared to previous time interval
b1, b2 – Changing time intervals
b2 – varied from 40 to 120 min
BD – Before decompression of CO2 pneumoperitoneum
AD – After decompression of CO2 pneumoperitoneum
Click here to view
| Discussion|| |
Spinal anaesthesia is routinely deferred for laparoscopic surgeries because of its suppressive effect on the respiratory muscle function and Haemodynamics under increased intraabdominal pressure. The shoulder pain arising from C5 dermatome also required high level of spinal blockade or increased amount of supplementary sedation. Hence general anaesthesia with controlled ventilation is adopted for even minor and diagnostic laparoscopic procedures. In our study we have shown that spinal anaesthesia with a local anaesthetic and narcotic combination can be safely utilized without respiratory, haemodynamic suppression or discomfort to the patients. The reduction in the tidal volume in first 9 min, was probably due to the mechanical effect of pneumoperitoneum. The recovery of tidal volume towards the baseline in next 15min, indicates that even in the presence of pneumoperitoneum, the preserved inspiratory activity of the diaphragm under spinal anaesthesia could satisfactorily restore the tidal volume in the settings of increased intra abdominal pressure to maintain the P E'CO2 within physiological limits. Maximal inspiratory capacity which is an indicator of inspiratory reserve dropped by less than 20% from base line but remained more than 3 times the tidal volume at 20 min after pneumoperitoneum. Maintenance of diaphragmatic tone, rib cage volume and FRC under regional anaesthesia has been well establisheD. ,, Warner et al  had demonstrated that the FRC was actually increased by 300 ml because of caudad movement of diaphragm under epidural anaesthesia of 1 st thoracic dermatome in supine position.
In our study the P E'CO2 was increasing till 15 min in a step wise manner and stabilized thereafter without any further increase till decompression of the pneumoperitoneum. Tan et al  demonstrated that absorption of CO 2 from the peritoneal surface in humans during conventional laparoscopy stabilized around 40 ml / min in 15 min time and there was no demonstrable increase in 30 min. Lister et al  in their animal study demonstrated that, under general anaesthesia the CO 2 elimination increased linearly when the intra peritoneal CO 2 insufflation pressure increased from 0 to 10 mmHg and it did not increase any further despite increasing the CO 2 insufflation pressure to 25 mmHg. They hypothesized that the increase in P E 'CO2 indicated that the CO 2 absorption was proportional to peritoneal surface area exposed by the intra abdominal pressure during the initial insufflation of CO 2 and stabilization indicated that the maximal surface area has been recruited for the given intra abdominal pressure. In the present study also, the increase in P E 'CO2 was neither linear nor correlated with reduced tidal volume in time indicating that the initial rise was due to increasing absorption and stabilization indicated absorption matched with the elimination but at a higher P E 'CO2 level within physiological limits.
In our study there was no change in the respiratory rate with increasing P E'CO2 when the patient had adequate respiratory reserve under spinal anaesthesia. The ventilatory response to Hypercapnia is well preserved under spinal anaesthesia.  Ciofolo et al  in their study on laparoscopy under epidural anaesthesia demonstrated that the arterial carbon dioxide level was kept unchanged by increased minute ventilation and respiratory rate during CO 2 pneumoperitoneum. The explanations could be the effect of intrathecal fentanyl shifting the CO 2 response curve to the left.  The deafferentation effect of spinal anaesthesia and the attending sedation cannot be ruled out from our present study design.
In our study, the arterial carbon dioxide increased at 20 min without a significant change in arterial to end tidal CO 2 difference from the pre pneumoperitoneum base line [6.14 ± 4.70 to 5.70 ± 4.47 mmHg]. Lundh et al  showed with multiple inert gas elimination technique, the ventilation perfusion (V/Q) and FRC to closing capacity ratio was unchanged under epidural anaesthesia of third thoracic dermatome. Similarly in our study population unchanged arterial to end tidal CO2 difference possibly indicate the V/ Q ratio and FRC was maintained by the preserved diaphragmatic activity.
Haemodynamic stability using local anaesthetic and narcotic combination in spinal anaesthesia has been well demonstrated. ,,,,, In our study also the pulse rate, systolic and diastolic blood pressure decreased by less than 20% at any time interval. Nine patients who had hypotension required only one dose of 6mg mephentermine, none of them required continued pharmacological support for maintaining blood pressure or heart rate within 20 % of the base line. Probably the lithotomy and Trendelenberg position may have played a vital role in maintaining the venous return and the attending cardiac output. 
Only three patients complained of shoulder pain, a very low incidence compared to the other studies ,,,,, and this could be attributed to the high differential blockade without muscle paralysis (median C5) achieved with 50 microgram of intrathecal fentanyl. Vaghadia et al  in their study on selective spinal anaesthesia for outpatient laparoscopy demonstrated that all their 20 patients were able to perceive the touch (pressure) sensation throughout the surgical procedure without any pain with local anaesthetic and narcotic combination. They highlighted that pain and soft touch carried by smaller Aδ (2 - 5 μm) and C fibers (0.3 - 1.3μm) which were selectively blocked with sparing of pressure and crude touch which were carried by larger Aβ (5 - 12μm) fibers. Similarly in our study patients there was a difference of 5 to 7 dermatomal segments in most of the patients between the perception of pressure and perception of pain for the same needle prick stimulus. None of the patient had weakness or loss of sensation in the upper limb, or Horner's syndrome to suggest the possibility of high spinal block. Similarly the incidence of pruritus was less (2.7%) probably due to the modulating effect hyperbaric bupivacaine on opioid receptors.
We conclude that in patients under spinal anaesthesia using a mixture of bupivacaine and fentanyl with a total sensory block up to 5 th thoracic dermatome, the gas exchange is well maintained within physiological limits even during pneumoperitoneum because of the preserved diaphragmatic activity; hence it is a safe alternative technique to general anesthesia for gynaecological laparoscopy.
Limitations of the study: The change in respiratory rate was not appreciable in spite of increased CO2 load. The role of intrathecally administered fentanyl towards this could not be commented upon. Similarly, the cardiovascular effect of this study cannot be extrapolated to a patient needing a head up position like in cholecystectomy.
| Acknowledgements|| |
We wish to acknowledge the management of Mahatma Gandhi Medical College and Research Institute for allowing us to conduct the study without cost to the patient.
Dr. Raju N Pusapti, Dr Sivashanmugam T, Dr. Ravishankar M, have no conflicts of interest or financial ties to disclose.
| References|| |
|1.||Vaghadia H, Mcleod DH, Mitchell GWE, Merricc PM, Chilvers CR. Small-dose hypobaric lidocaine-fentanyl spinal anaesthesia for short duration out patient laparoscopy. 1. A randomized comparison with conventional-dose hyperbaric lidocaine. Anesth Analg 1997; 84: 59-64. |
|2.||Chilvers CR, Vaghadia H, Mitchell GWE, Merrick PM. (Small-dose hypobaric lidocaine-fentanyl spinal anaesthesia for short duration out patient laparascopy. 2. optimal fentanyl dose. Anesth Analg 1997; 84: 65-70. |
|3.||Vaghadia H, Viskari D, Mitchell GWE, Berrill A. Selective spinal anaesthesia for out patient laparoscopy. 1: Characteristics of three hypobaric solutions. Can J Anesth 2001; 48: 256-260. |
|4.||Vaghadia H, Solylo M, Henderson C, Mitchell GWE. Selective spinal anaesthesia for out patient laparoscopy. 2: Epinephrine and spinal cord function. Can J Anesth 2001; 48: 261-266. |
|5.||Chilvers CR, Goodwin A, Vaghadia H, Mitchell GW. Selective spinal anaesthesia for out patient laparoscopy. 5: Pharmacoeconamic comparison versus general anaesthesia. Can J Anesth 2001; 48: 279-283. |
|6.||Lennox PH, Chilvers CR, Vaghadia H. (2002) Selective spinal anaesthesia versus desflurane anaesthesia in short duration outpatient gynecological laparoscopy: A pharmacoeconomic comparison. Anesthe. Analg. 94: 565-568. |
|7.||Takasaki M, Takahashi T: Respiratory function during cervical and thoracic extradural analgesia in patients with normal lungs. Br J Anaesth 1980; 52: 1271-1275. |
|8.||McCarthy GS: The effect of thoracic extradural analgesia on pulmonary gas distribution, functional residual capacity and airway closure. Br J Anaesth 1976; 48: 243-247. |
|9.||Freund FG, Bonica JJ, Ward RJ, Akamatsu TJ, Kennedy WF Jr: Ventilatory reserve and level of motor block during high spinal and epidural anesthesia. Anesthesiology 1967; 28: 834-837. |
|10.||Warner DO, Warner MA, Ritman EL. (1996) Human chest wall function during epidural anaesthesia. Anesthesiology 1996; 85: 761-773. |
|11.||Tan PL, Lee TI, Tweed WA: Carbon dioxide absorption and gas exchange during pelvic laparoscopy. Can J Anaesth 1992; 39: 677-681. |
|12.||Lister DR, Rudston-Brown B, Warriner CB, McEwen J, Chan M, Walley KR. Carbon dioxide absorption is not linearly related to intraperitonial carbon dioxide insufflation pressure in pigs. Anesthesiology 1994; 80: 129-136. |
|13.||Steinbrook RA, Concepcion M, Topulos GP: Ventilatory responses to hypercapnia during bupivacaine spinal anesthesia. Anesth Analg 1988; 67:247-252. |
|14.||Ciofolo MJ, Clergue F, Seebacher J, Lefebvre G, Viars P . Ventilatory Effects of Laparoscopy Under Epidural Anesthesia. Anesth Analg 1990; 70: 357-361 |
|15.||Varrassi G, Celleno D, Capogna G, Costantino P, Emanuelli M, Sebastiani M, Pesce AF, Niv D. Ventilatory effects of subarachnoid fentanyl in the elderly. Anaesthesia 1992; 47 : 558-562. |
|16.||Lundh R, Hedenstierna G, Johansson H: Ventilation-perfusion relationships during epidural analgesia. Acta Anaesthesiol Scand 1983; 27: 410-416. |
|17.||Miyable M, Sonoda H, Namiki A. (1995) The effect of lithotomy position on arterial blood pressure after spinal anaesthesia. Anesth Analg 81: 96-98. |
[Figure 1], [Figure 2], [Figure 3]
[Table 1], [Table 2], [Table 3]