|Year : 2013 | Volume
| Issue : 2 | Page : 244-247
A surgeon's assessment of inadequate neuromuscular antagonism in a case of prolonged neuromuscular blockade
James J Lamberg, Joseph F Answine
Department of Anesthesiology, Pennsylvania State University Milton S Hershey Medical Center, Pennsylvania, USA
|Date of Web Publication||13-May-2013|
James J Lamberg
Department of Anesthesiology, H187, Penn State Hershey Medical Center, 500 University Drive Hershey, Pennsylvania 17033
Source of Support: None, Conflict of Interest: None
Evaluation of the degree of neuromuscular blockade by the surgeon using clinical criteria alone is unreliable. We report a case of prolonged neuromuscular blockade lasting 5.5 h, where an additional intra-operative dose of neuromuscular relaxant was given at the request of the surgical team. Possible causes of prolonged neuromuscular antagonism are discussed, as is the importance of neuromuscular assessment prior to the administration of additional neuromuscular blocking agents when receiving a surgeon request for additional neuromuscularblockade.
Keywords: Neuromuscular block monitoring, Neuromuscular nondepolarizing agents, neuromuscular blockade
|How to cite this article:|
Lamberg JJ, Answine JF. A surgeon's assessment of inadequate neuromuscular antagonism in a case of prolonged neuromuscular blockade. J Anaesthesiol Clin Pharmacol 2013;29:244-7
|How to cite this URL:|
Lamberg JJ, Answine JF. A surgeon's assessment of inadequate neuromuscular antagonism in a case of prolonged neuromuscular blockade. J Anaesthesiol Clin Pharmacol [serial online] 2013 [cited 2021 Jan 21];29:244-7. Available from: https://www.joacp.org/text.asp?2013/29/2/244/111654
| Introduction|| |
We report a case of residual neuromuscular blockade lasting more than 5 h following an intravenous intubating dose of 50 mg of rocuronium, followed by 10 mg of the same neuromuscular blocking agent given an hour later. We have also discussed possible causes of prolonged neuromuscular antagonism in our patient, the importance of neuromuscular assessment, and the use of post-tetanic count when receiving a surgeon's request for additional relaxation.
| Case Report|| |
An 82-year-old 74 kg woman presented for completion of a right extended hemicolectomy for colonic dysplasia. Her past medical history included long-standing hypertension, obesity, dyslipidemia, type 2 diabetes mellitus, and glaucoma. Her surgical history included bilateral eye procedures for glaucoma, left Achilles tendon repair, and a colonic resection for dysplasia 4 years ago. Outside hospital records describing her prior surgeries could not be obtained. She denied any anesthesia-related complications with her previous procedures, family history of anesthetic complications, or family history of neuromuscular disorders. Her medications at the time of surgery included aspirin, bimatoprost-timolol ophthalmic solution, calcium with vitamin D, dorzolamide ophthalmic solution, ezetimibe, glyburide, hydrochlorothiazide, insulin glargine, lisinopril, pravastatin, and prednisolone ophthalmic solution. The patient received 2 mg of intravenous midazolam pre-operatively, and induction was accomplished with 100 mcg of fentanyl, followed by 150 mg of propofol. Rocuronium 50 mg was then given to facilitate endotracheal intubation. The patient received 0.4 mg of hydromorphone shortly after induction as well as 3 g of ampicillin-sulbactam intravenously. Anesthesia was maintained throughout the case at 1MAC of end-tidal desflurane with 50/50 air and oxygen. Esophageal temperature was kept above 35°C throughout the case using active warming with a forced air warming device.
Our involvement in the case begins at 1.5 h after induction, at which point an anesthesia personnel change occurred. It was noted that 10 mg of rocuronium was given 15 min prior to hand-off communication due to the surgeon's request for additional relaxation. Monitoring of neuromuscular function was not performed at that time and the surgeon's assessment was made by tactile feel in the surgical field. Shortly after hand-off, a nerve stimulator (TOF-Watch, Bluestar Enterprises, Omaha NE) was attached over the facial nerve using electrocardiogram pads and it was set to 60 mA, revealing a train-of-four (TOF) count of 0 at the corrugator supercilii. At 1.75 h after induction, TOF count was still 0 and the post-tetanic count (PTC) was 0. The post-tetanic count was determined by 5 sec of 50 Hz tetanic stimulation followed 3 sec later by 1 Hz single stimulation. An additional nerve stimulator was attached over the ulnar nerve giving the same results.
Surgery was completed at approximately 2 h post-induction, and TOF count remained 0 with a PTC of 0. Desflurane was discontinued and an infusion of propofol 25-50 mcg/kg/min was started. A Mapleson F circuit was constructed and the patient was transferred to the post-anesthesia care unit (PACU) while delivering positive pressure ventilation using 100% oxygen. End-tidal desflurane was 0% prior to transportation. Consideration was made for a selective relaxant binding agent (SRBA) such as sugammadex, however, it is not currently available in the United States. On arrival to the PACU, she was hemodynamically stable with a skin temperature of 36.2°C. Laboratory studies were sent with results and reference values as shown in [Table 1]. The laboratory results were similar to pre-operative values except for serum potassium, which was 3.6 mmol/L pre-operatively. The patient received 40 mEq of intravenous potassium given at 10 mEq/h to correct the hypokalemia. Hepatic enzymes had been assessed within recent months and were found to be within normal limits.
Mechanical ventilation was initiated and propofol infusion was continued. TOF and PTC monitoring continued every 15 min. At 3.5 h after induction, TOF count was 0, PTC was 1, and no spontaneous respiratory effort was noted. At 4.5 h, TOF count was 1. At 5.5 h, TOF ratio was 90%. Since the TOF-Watch was not placed or calibrated at the beginning of surgery, and due to prolonged neuromuscular blockade, it was decided to give an acetylcholinesterase inhibitor prior to extubation. The patient was given 5 mg of neostigmine with 0.6 mg of glycopyrrolate and extubated without difficulty 10 min later. She demonstrated no signs of respiratory compromise and her recovery was otherwise uneventful.
| Discussion|| |
Evaluation of the degree of neuromuscular blockade by clinical criteria alone does not exclude clinically significant curarization.  Furthermore, surgical personnel do not routinely evaluate neuromuscular blockade with objective monitoring. Anesthesia personnel should take into consideration the assessment of neuromuscular blockade by the surgical team, but should not administer additional neuromuscular blocking agents based on this assessment alone. Prolonged neuromuscular blockade is rare, but not unique. Similar cases ,, have demonstrated that even a single intubating dose of an intermediate-acting neuromuscular blocking agent can cause prolonged neuromuscular blockade, which should mandate the need for neuromuscular assessment every time additional neuromuscular blocking agent is considered. Failure to objectively assess neuromuscular function may result in prolongation of a profound neuromuscular blockade, as was seen in our case. Many factors were considered in attempting to understand our patient's prolonged blockade. Liver disease could decrease drug metabolism and increase the volume of distribution, which could prolong the duration of action. Renal failure prolongs the duration of action and the effect could range from insignificant , to an 84% increase in mean residence time  with a 0.6 mg/kg bolus dose.
Women are 30% more sensitive to rocuronium than men.  Variability in duration of action doubles in elderly patients receiving rocuronium versus cisatracurium.  Hypothermia is also known to prolong the duration of nondepolarizing neuromuscular blockers. Volatile anesthetics may slightly reduce neuromuscular transmission, even in the absence of neuromuscular blockade.  Volatile anesthetics prolong the duration of action of neuromuscular blockers and decrease the dose required for blockade. ,, Potentiation is greatest with desflurane, followed in order by sevoflurane, isoflurane, halothane, and propofol. ,
Antibiotics that are known to potentiate neuromuscular blockade include aminoglycosides, polymyxins, lincomycin, clindamycin, and tetracyclines. There is a long list of drugs that can augment blockade including lithium, local anesthetics, cardiac antidysrhythmics, diuretics, antiestrogens, and magnesium sulfate.
Metabolic and respiratory acidosis may increase neuromuscular blockade. Magnesium imbalance potentiates blockade as does hypokalemia and hypocalcemia. 
When assessing a profound neuromuscular blockade, the choice of muscle to monitor as well as the type of stimulation to deliver should be taken into account. The corrugator supercilii is useful as a guide to assess deep blockade when compared to the orbicularis oculi and adductor pollicis muscles. ,, Assessment of TOF at the corrugator supercilii better reflects abdominal muscle relaxation. , Post-tetanic count can provide useful information about deep neuromuscular blockade. ,, A post-tetanic count of <3 demonstrates over 5-10 min of additional deep blockade with rocuronium, vecuronium, atracurium, or cisatracurium and over 30 min of additional deep blockade with pancuronium. , It is important to note that tetanic stimulation may produce lasting antagonism of neuromuscular blockade at the site of testing, and tetanic stimulation should not be performed more often than every 6 min at a given site. ,
It is probable that a single factor cannot explain the prolonged neuromuscular blockade in our patient. These factors include female gender, increased age, mildly reduced renal function, hypokalemia, and the use of desflurane. However, there are many cases of patients with similar compromises who emerge from neuromuscular block without delay. The exact cause of our patient's prolonged blockade remains unknown and helps to emphasize that neuromuscular assessment should be used for all patients despite the presence or absence of factors that prolong neuromuscular blockade. [Figure 1] represents our algorithm to aid in clinical decision making when presented with a surgeon's perception of inadequate neuromuscular antagonism, leading to a request for additional neuromuscular blocking agent. Given our patient's presentation, it is very likely that she had profound neuromuscular blockade at the time when additional relaxation was requested. Qualitative confirmation of an appropriate surgical level of relaxation could have been achieved by following our proposed algorithm.
|Figure 1: Algorithm for surgeon's perception of inadequate neuromuscular antagonism|
Click here to view
| Conclusion|| |
This case illustrates the need to assess neuromuscular function prior to the use of additional neuromuscular blocking agent and not to rely on a surgeon's perception of inadequate blockade. Numerous factors can lead to prolonged effect of neuromuscular blocking agents including increased age, female gender, renal failure, electrolyte disturbances, and concomitant use of various medications. Train-of-four assessment combined with post-tetanic count can be used to provide objective evidence of profound blockade when the anesthesia provider is presented with perceived inadequate neuromuscular antagonism in the surgical field.
| Acknowledgements|| |
We would like to thank Dr. Sonia J. Vaida for her helpful guidance."
| References|| |
|1.||Viby-Mogensen J, Jørgensen BC, Ording H. Residual curarization in the recovery room. Anesthesiology 1979;50:539-41. |
|2.||Morales Martín AC, Vaquero Roncero LM, Muriel Villoria C. Extremely prolonged neuromuscular blockade after rocuronium: A case report. Acta Anaesthesiol Scand 2009;53:957-9. |
|3.||Claudius C, Karacan H, Viby-Mogensen J. Prolonged residual paralysis after a single intubating dose of rocuronium. Br J Anaesth 2007;99:514-7. |
|4.||Olivieri L, Plourde G. Prolonged (more than ten hours) neuromuscular blockade after cardiac surgery: Report of two cases. Can J Anaesth 2005;52:88-93. |
|5.||Cooper RA, Maddineni VR, Mirakhur RK, Wierda JM, Brady M, Fitzpatrick KT. Time course of neuromuscular effects and pharmacokinetics of rocuronium bromide (Org 9426) during isoflurane anaesthesia in patients with and without renal failure. Br J Anaesth 1993;71:222-6. |
|6.||Khuenl-Brady KS, Pomaroli A, Pühringer F, Mitterschiffthaler G, Koller J. The use of rocuronium (ORG 9426) in patients with chronic renal failure. Anaesthesia 1993;48:873-5. |
|7.||Robertson EN, Driessen JJ, Booij LH. Pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of rocuronium in patients with and without renal failure. Eur J Anaesthesiol 2005;22:4-10. |
|8.||Xue FS, Tong SY, Liao X, Liu JH, An G, Luo LK. Dose-response and time course of effect of rocuronium in male and female anesthetized patients. Anesth Analg 1997;85:667-71. |
|9.||Arain SR, Kern S, Ficke DJ, Ebert TJ. Variability of duration of action of neuromuscular-blocking drugs in elderly patients. Acta Anaesthesiol Scand 2005;49:312-5. |
|10.||Kelly RE, Lien CA, Savarese JJ, Belmont MR, Hartman GS, Russo JR, et al. Depression of neuromuscular function in a patient during desflurane anesthesia. Anesth Analg 1993;76:868-71. |
|11.||Saitoh Y, Toyooka H, Amaha K. Recoveries of post-tetanic twitch and train-of-four responses after administration of vecuronium with different inhalation anaesthetics and neuroleptanaesthesia. Br J Anaesth 1993;70:402-4. |
|12.||Rupp SM, Miller RD, Gencarelli PJ. Vecuronium-induced neuromuscular blockade during enflurane, isoflurane, and halothane anesthesia in humans. Anesthesiology 1984;60:102-5. |
|13.||Wulf H, Ledowski T, Linstedt U, Proppe D, Sitzlack D. Neuromuscular blocking effects of rocuronium during desflurane, isoflurane, and sevoflurane anaesthesia. Can J Anaesth 1998;45:526-32. |
|14.||Bock M, Klippel K, Nitsche B, Bach A, Martin E, Motsch J. Rocuronium potency and recovery characteristics during steady-state desflurane, sevoflurane, isoflurane or propofol anaesthesia. Br J Anaesth 2000;84:43-7. |
|15.||Waud BE, Waud DR. Interaction of calcium and potassium with neuromuscular blocking agents. Br J Anaesth 1980;52:863-6. |
|16.||Plaud B, Debaene B, Donati F. The corrugator supercilii, not the orbicularis oculi, reflects rocuronium neuromuscular blockade at the laryngeal adductor muscles. Anesthesiology 2001;95:96-101. |
|17.||Donati F. Muscle relaxants: A clinical update. Can J Anaesth 2003;50:R65-8. |
|18.||Lee HJ, Kim KS, Jeong JS, Cheong MA, Shim JC. Comparison of the adductor pollicis, orbicularis oculi, and corrugator supercilii as indicators of adequacy of muscle relaxation for tracheal intubation. Br J Anaesth 2009;102:869-74. |
|19.||Kirov K, Motamed C, Ndoko SK, Dhonneur G. TOF count at corrugator supercilii reflects abdominal muscles relaxation better than at adductor pollicis. Br J Anaesth 2007;98:611-4. |
|20.||Viby-Mogensen J, Howardy-Hansen P, Chraemmer-Jørgensen B, Ording H, Engbaek J, Nielsen A. Posttetanic count (PTC): A new method of evaluating an intense nondepolarizing neuromuscular blockade. Anesthesiology 1981;55:458-61. |
|21.||Bonsu AK, Viby-Mogensen J, Fernando PU, Muchhal K, Tamilarasan A, Lambourne A. Relationship of post-tetanic count and train-of-four response during intense neuromuscular blockade caused by atracurium. Br J Anaesth 1987;59:1089-92. |
|22.||Muchhal KK, Viby-Mogensen J, Fernando PU, Tamilarasan A, Bonsu AK, Lambourne A. Evaluation of intense neuromuscular blockade caused by vecuronium using posttetanic count (PTC). Anesthesiology 1987;66:846-9. |
|23.||El-Orbany MI, Joseph NJ, Salem MR. The relationship of posttetanic count and train-of-four responses during recovery from intense cisatracurium-induced neuromuscular blockade. Anesth Analg 2003;97:80-4. |
|24.||Fernando PU, Viby-Mogensen J, Bonsu AK, Tamilarasan A, Muchhal KK, Lambourne A. Relationship between posttetanic count and response to carinal stimulation during vecuronium-induced neuromuscular blockade. Acta Anaesthesiol Scand 1987;31:593-6. |
|25.||Saitoh Y, Masuda A, Toyooka H, Amaha K. Effect of tetanic stimulation on subsequent train-of-four responses at various levels of vecuronium-induced neuromuscular block. Br J Anaesth 1994;73:416-7. |