Users Online: 722 Home Print this page Email this page Small font sizeDefault font sizeIncrease font size  
Home | About us | Editorial board | Search | Ahead of print | Current issue | Archives | Submit article | Instructions | Subscribe | Contacts | Login 


RSACP wishes to inform that it shall be discontinuing the dispatch of print copy of JOACP to it's Life members. The print copy of JOACP will be posted only to those life members who send us a written confirmation for continuation of print copy.
Kindly email your affirmation for print copies to [email protected] preferably by 30th June 2019.

 

 
Table of Contents
LETTER TO EDITOR
Year : 2020  |  Volume : 36  |  Issue : 3  |  Page : 414-415

Re-exploring the online surveys: Research tools in COVID times


1 Department of Trauma and Emergency, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, Bhubaneswar, Odisha, India
2 Department of College of Nursing, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, Bhubaneswar, Odisha, India
3 Department of Orthopedics, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, Bhubaneswar, Odisha, India

Date of Submission04-Jul-2020
Date of Acceptance08-Jul-2020
Date of Web Publication15-Sep-2020

Correspondence Address:
Dr. Mantu Jain
106 Mahadev Orchid, Cosmopolis Road, Dumduma, Bhubaneswar - 751 019, Odisha
India
Login to access the Email id

Source of Support: None, Conflict of Interest: None


DOI: 10.4103/joacp.JOACP_401_20

Rights and Permissions

How to cite this article:
Mohanty CR, Radhakrishnan RV, Jain M. Re-exploring the online surveys: Research tools in COVID times. J Anaesthesiol Clin Pharmacol 2020;36:414-5

How to cite this URL:
Mohanty CR, Radhakrishnan RV, Jain M. Re-exploring the online surveys: Research tools in COVID times. J Anaesthesiol Clin Pharmacol [serial online] 2020 [cited 2020 Nov 25];36:414-5. Available from: https://www.joacp.org/text.asp?2020/36/3/414/295108

Dear Editor,

The coronavirus disease-2019 (COVID-19) pandemic has made persuing researches challenging in view of risk of transmission of disease from study participants and their caregiver to the healthcare professional or even vice versa.[1] This is in addition to reduced number of operative procedures, as many hospitals are engaged in treating COVID patients. Many researchers have found the virus interesting and the literature is now getting filled up with information, publications, and updates as the disease is unfolding itself. While on the other hand, the non-COVID-related studies have taken a brake. Hence, scientists have started to utilize this time for getting the answers of unsolved queries through online surveys and reaching a consensus. The surveys can gather response even from a large number of people working in the same field no matter even if they are geographically widely distributed. The process is simplified and expediated by online tools that have made it time saving. Online surveys cater to a great way to hold audiences engaged and getting meaningful responses. The flexibility in administration in terms of feasibility, cost-effectiveness, and widespread coverage makes online surveys unique in research data collection.[2],[3] There are many free and paid online survey tools that can be judicially used to capture the relevant data addressed by the research questions. The paid versions albiet allow for greater flexibility and response options including multiple-choice responses, radio buttons, dropdowns, and rating scales grids. Majority of the survey software can set up an agreement to participate from the responder and also uses information from the previous response to proceed further in survey.[4]

The clinical research in the current year is undergoing a transformation with an increasing trend towards availability and usage of several online survey tools using various web-based data management platforms like REDCap, developed by Vanderbilt university consortium. There also include commercial products like Survey Monkey, Zoomerang, and Qualtrics that provides online easy to use survey development tools and other useful settings for automatic emailing to study participants.[5] It is also imperative that the transition from traditional paper-pencil format to Web-based surveys not to ignore the core principles of designing good quality data collection instruments. The most widely used online surveys include SoGoSurvey, Survey Monkey, Type form, Google Forms, Client Heartbeat, Zoho Survey, Survey Gizmo, and Survey Planet. Among these Google forms and Sogosurvey are the widely used online tools that provide options for free skip logic.[4]

Amidst to the difference in epidemiology of CIVID-19 outbreaks and its clinical presentations across nations and different health systems, online platforms can also play a key role in information exchange and serving a standardized data collection and mutual accordance of response across hospitals. Remarkably, the clinician-scientists should not undermine the opportunities for developing a sustainable collaborative research network with all service providers by using existing clinical registries or developing research platforms in collaboration with apex bodies such as Indian Council of medical research and other critical care societies.

It is also imperative that the transition from traditional paper-pencil format to Web-based surveys and platforms not to ignore the core principles of designing good quality data collection instruments and adherence to ethical guidelines.

Financial support and sponsorship

Nil.

Conflicts of interest

There are no conflicts of interest.



 
  References Top

1.
Liu T, Hu J, Kang M, Lin L, Zhong H, Xiao J, et al. Transmission dynamics of 2019 novel coronavirus (2019-nCoV). bioRxiv. doi: 10.1101/2020.01.25.919787.  Back to cited text no. 1
    
2.
Uhlig CE, Seitz B, Eter N, Promesberger J, Busse H. Efficiencies of Internet-based digital and paper-based scientific surveys and the estimated costs and time for different-sized cohorts. PLoS One 2014;9:e108441.  Back to cited text no. 2
    
3.
Ebert JF, Huibers L, Christensen B, Christensen MB. Paper- or web-based questionnaire invitations as a method for data collection: Cross-sectional comparative study of differences in response rate, completeness of data, and financial cost. J Med Internet Res 2018;20:e24.  Back to cited text no. 3
    
4.
Available from: https://www.wordstream.com/blog/ws/2014/11/10/best-online-survey-tools. [Last accessed on 2020 May 25].  Back to cited text no. 4
    
5.
Hulley SB, Cummings SR, Browner WS, Grady DG, Newman TB. Designing clinical research. 4th ed. Philadelphia: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins; 2013.  Back to cited text no. 5
    




 

Top
 
  Search
 
    Similar in PUBMED
    Access Statistics
    Email Alert *
    Add to My List *
* Registration required (free)  

 
  In this article
   References

 Article Access Statistics
    Viewed234    
    Printed14    
    Emailed0    
    PDF Downloaded22    
    Comments [Add]    

Recommend this journal